Russell Edward Long · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Apr 2014•Cumbria (North & West)

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to maintain the bridge parapet in a safe condition

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Cumbria County Council

    Raise the North West parapet wall to match the vehicle restraint system height.

  2. Cumbria County Council

    Install a vehicle restraint system on the North West verge leading to the bridge.

  3. Cumbria County Council

    Install bend warning signs to complement the vehicle restraint and parapet works.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain the bridge parapet in a safe condition

Wider context from the report

“The deceased was driving east on the B5307 Road approaching the bridge over the River Wampool between Fingland and Kirkbride. His vehicle left the road. The near side parapet of the bridge had been previously damaged some considerable time ago. Grass had overgrown the area, and end stones and coping stones had been dislodged. What remained amounted to a “ramp”. When the deceased’s vehicle hit this, the car became airborne and it overturned. It is entirely foreseeable that if the parapet remains in this condition a similar accident could occur in the future. Action should be considered to repair the parapet and erect a barrier to guide vehicles away from the hazard. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Raise the North West parapet wall to match the vehicle restraint system height.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can inform you that all the past month works have been carried out at this site which will address the issues you have raised.”

Source location

2014-0165-Response-by-Cumbria-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 9 April 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install a vehicle restraint system on the North West verge leading to the bridge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can inform you that all the past month works have been carried out at this site which will address the issues you have raised.”

Source location

2014-0165-Response-by-Cumbria-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 9 April 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install bend warning signs to complement the vehicle restraint and parapet works.

Verbatim wording from the response

“These works will also be complemented by bend warning signs.”

Source location

2014-0165-Response-by-Cumbria-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 9 April 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026