PFD report

Graham Thomas John SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Sep 2023•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of clinician awareness of the seriousness of Myasthenia Gravis and its interaction with Gentamicin
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clinician awareness of the seriousness of Myasthenia Gravis and its interaction with Gentamicin

Wider context from the report

“1. During the course of the inquest I heard evidence from the author of a Serious Investigation Report commissioned by the Trust (University Hospitals Birmingham) that the errors with regard to medication were, in part, due to a lack of awareness on the part of clinicians within the Trust as to the seriousness of Myasthenia Gravis as well as the interaction between Gentamicin and this condition. 2. I also heard evidence from the author of the SI report about a comprehensive action plan that is being put in place to raise awareness within the Trust including the development and issue of a Trust wide patient safety notice in relation to Antibiotic Prescribing in patients with Myasthenia Gravis. 3. However, given the apparent lack of awareness about Myasthenia Gravis amongst clinicians within UHB, a large hospital trust in a significant metropolitan area, I am concerned that there is a risk that a similar lack of awareness could persist amongst clinicians in other areas of the country and that consideration should be given to raising awareness more widely. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Engage Birmingham University Hospitals Trust and Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Board on the reported concerns and identified local actions.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 September 2023.
  2. 2

    Discuss Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share learning across NHS national and regional teams.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 September 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage Birmingham University Hospitals Trust and Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Board on the reported concerns and identified local actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“My regional colleagues in the Midlands are also in the process of engaging with Birmingham University Hospitals Trust and Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Board on the concerns raised in your Report and what local actions have been identified and will keep national NHS England colleagues updated on the status of this. You may also wish to contact the Trust directly.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 14 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share learning across NHS national and regional teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 14 September 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026