PFD report

Honoria Culshaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Sep 2025•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of sharing pacemaker wound test results with the surgical team
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Strengthen the wound-swab tracking and review documentation to record swab timing, result review, clinician notification and associated treatment.

    Stated by Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 September 2025.
  2. Action

    Add wound-swab results to the WHO checklist, using an interim sticker until the revised form is approved, redesigned and printed.

    Stated by Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 29 September 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Microbiology telephone notification was not required because the superficial wound swab result did not meet critical-result reporting criteria.

    Stated by Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of sharing pacemaker wound test results with the surgical team

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence that on the 15th August 2024, a swab from the pacemaker wound tested positive for the Morganella Morganii bacteria, which was also found post-mortem. It is not clear from the evidence who on the surgical team was made aware of this result, and whether it was properly taken into consideration as part of the pre-operative risk assessment. Mrs. Culshaw had her pacemaker re-sited on the 20th August 2024. I found that Mrs. Culshaw’s experience of persistent and prolonged infection depleted her physiological reserve and contributed to her succumbing to a fatal pneumonia on the 25th October 2024. I am concerned that this lack of information sharing of test results, which in this case may have resulted in an extraction process not taking place at the earliest opportunity. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen the wound-swab tracking and review documentation to record swab timing, result review, clinician notification and associated treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A wound swab tracking document managed by the Cardiology Catheter Laboratory (CCL) team has been strengthened. This includes a daily check, details of results received, and which clinicians have been informed.”

Source location

Response from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add wound-swab results to the WHO checklist, using an interim sticker until the revised form is approved, redesigned and printed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• “Wound swab check” has been added to the WHO checklist.¹ The WHO checklist is carried out immediately prior to the procedure with the participation of the full team undertaking the procedure.”

Source location

Response from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Microbiology telephone notification was not required because the superficial wound swab result did not meet critical-result reporting criteria.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Progress: Microbiology advise they will telephone through critical results about virulent organisms such as group A streptococcus, or if it is from a normally sterile site, or if the organism has resistant markers of national concern.”

Source location

Response from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Page 8 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Harris Flex cannot automatically alert clinicians to pathology results, limiting automated result notification while IT work continues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The electronic system in place at the Trust does not have a facility to automatically alert the clinician and therefore there is a risk on the risk register (Datix ID 2176) ‘Harris Flex currently does not follow, or support UK medical workflows leading to delay or missed review of Pathology results’.”

Source location

Response from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Page 8 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Review and approve the updated documentation through divisional governance committees and submit it to the Trust Clinical Documentation Group for standardisation.

    Stated by Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 September 2025.
  2. 2

    Share the action plan and learning with the wider cardiology consultant body to confirm agreed processes.

    Stated by Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 September 2025.
  3. 3

    Strengthen communication pathways with Wythenshawe Hospital and other tertiary centres.

    Stated by Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 29 September 2025.
  4. 4

    Incorporate the WHO checklist into the Trust-wide workstream standardising LocSSIPs in line with NatSSIPs.

    Stated by Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 September 2025.
  5. 5

    Implement end-of-day multidisciplinary debriefs to review cases, identify issues and support continuous learning and quality improvement.

    Stated by Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 September 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and approve the updated documentation through divisional governance committees and submit it to the Trust Clinical Documentation Group for standardisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The updated documentation will be reviewed and approved by the divisional governance committees before being submitted to the Trust Clinical Documentation Group to ensure consistency and standardisation.”

Source location

Response from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Page 7 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the action plan and learning with the wider cardiology consultant body to confirm agreed processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The actions are being monitored through Cardiology Governance Meetings, Divisional Safety and Quality meetings and through the PSIRF Oversight Panel. The action plan will also be shared with the wider cardiology consultant body to ensure collective awareness of the learning and confirmation of the agreed processes.”

Source location

Response from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen communication pathways with Wythenshawe Hospital and other tertiary centres.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At the inquest the Coroner issued a further Regulation 28 report to Manchester University NHS Foundation trust regarding their reliance on the patient to relay clinical information in relation to treatment plans to LTHTR. Whilst this response will primarily focus on the Regulation 28 concerning LTHTR, the Cardiology team are committed to working with Wythenshawe to strengthen communication pathways with tertiary centres.”

Source location

Response from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate the WHO checklist into the Trust-wide workstream standardising LocSSIPs in line with NatSSIPs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Going forward the WHO checklist will be incorporated into a wider Trust workstream to standardise LocSSIPs² across the organisation in line with NatSSIPs²³.”

Source location

Response from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Page 7 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement end-of-day multidisciplinary debriefs to review cases, identify issues and support continuous learning and quality improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Regulation 28 has provided an opportunity for further reflection and learning for the Cardiac Catheter Team, who in addition to developing specific actions in response to the coroner concerns raised, have also implemented end of day debriefs to review all cases performed that day. This is a 10-minute reflective session to discuss each case, identify any issues, and discuss continuous learning and on-going quality improvement within the department.”

Source location

Response from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026