PFD report

JAY STUART WHITING · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Nov 2024•Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Mature trees obstructing safe pedestrian and mobility-aid access along the pavement
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide safe pedestrian routes alongside roads
  2. Roadside mature trees creating an immediate vehicle-collision hazard
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of recurring collision risks at hazardous road locations
  3. Lack of formal risk assessment and evaluation of safety concerns relating to roadside trees
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Initiate the statutory process to extend the 30mph speed limit along approximately 800 metres of the A374 Embankment Road.

    Stated by Plymouth City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  2. Action

    Remove specified trees beside the north-east carriageway and reconstruct approximately 450 metres of the carriageway and footway.

    Stated by Plymouth City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 2 December 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Trees on the south-west carriageway are not considered a significant collision risk because of existing lower speeds, junction conditions and a safety camera.

    Stated by Plymouth City CouncilDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Mature trees obstructing safe pedestrian and mobility-aid access along the pavement

Wider context from the report

“Although the determinations at the inquest found there to be a number of relevant factors which contributed to the fatal road traffic collision and, therefore, to Jay Whiting’s death (as set out in paragraph 4, above), one such contributing factor was that the vehicle being driven by Jay Whiting left the road and immediately collided with a mature tree (one of many such trees which line Embankment Road, Plymouth). Embankment Road (or at least this particular stretch) is a dual carriageway and a main route into the city centre of Plymouth. As part of the investigation and inquest process, photos were taken of the scene by forensic collision investigating officers, and these showed the large trees to be adjacent to the dual carriageway, situated on a pavement only a matter of inches from the kerb. It is clear from these photos that, firstly, any vehicle that, in whatever situation, has cause to leave the road and mount the kerb is very likely to immediately collide with one of the mature trees and, secondly, the size of the trees (the circumference of their trunks) make it difficult for pedestrians, or those using mobility aides, to safely walk/move along the pavement without having to step into the road. Evidence was heard at the inquest from Motor Police Constable ████████ road casualty reduction officer for the Plymouth area (employed by Devon and Cornwall Police). MPC ████████’s unequivocal opinion was that the presence of these mature trees at this location (both on the northbound and southbound carriageways on Embankment Road, but particularly the stretch of trees at the location of this fatal incident on the northbound carriageway) is frankly dangerous from a road safety perspective. MPC ████████ stated that, in addition to this fatal accident in 2023, there was a fatal accident in 2008, where a vehicle collided with one of the trees along the same stretch of the northbound carriageway, resulting in the deaths of two occupants of the vehicle. MPC ████████ was therefore concerned that there had been three deaths arising in very similar circumstances at the same location, involving trauma brought about by vehicular collision with one of the mature trees. MPC ████████ stated that he was not aware of any other location in Plymouth where trees lining the road had been considered a contributory factor in a fatal vehicle collision. Owing to these concerns, MPC ████████ made a request that consideration is given by Plymouth City Council to removing the trees at this location. Evidence was also heard at the inquest from ████████ senior traffic engineer for street services (employed by Plymouth City Council). ████████ stated that he was aware of the concerns held by Devon and Cornwall Police regarding the mature trees and that, personally, he would also like the trees to be removed. ████████ stated that the removal of trees in Plymouth was currently ‘a political topic’ and, for the trees on Embankment Road to be removed, a decision would need to be taken justifying the use of scarce local authority public funding. ████████ accepted that there had, thus far, been no formal risk assessment or evaluation carried out by Plymouth City Council as to whether the safety concerns identified warranted resources being used to remove the trees. ████████ further accepted that this process should now take place and that he had been waiting for the outcome of this inquest before deciding upon appropriate next steps. Owing to there being clear safety concerns regarding the continued presence of these mature trees on Embankment Road, Plymouth, in my view these need to be formally considered (it is for Plymouth City Council to consider issues of risk and cost/benefit analysis of any proposed action/inaction) with a view to determining what, if anything, should happen to the trees. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide safe pedestrian routes alongside roads.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roadside mature trees creating an immediate vehicle-collision hazard

Wider context from the report

“Although the determinations at the inquest found there to be a number of relevant factors which contributed to the fatal road traffic collision and, therefore, to Jay Whiting’s death (as set out in paragraph 4, above), one such contributing factor was that the vehicle being driven by Jay Whiting left the road and immediately collided with a mature tree (one of many such trees which line Embankment Road, Plymouth). Embankment Road (or at least this particular stretch) is a dual carriageway and a main route into the city centre of Plymouth. As part of the investigation and inquest process, photos were taken of the scene by forensic collision investigating officers, and these showed the large trees to be adjacent to the dual carriageway, situated on a pavement only a matter of inches from the kerb. It is clear from these photos that, firstly, any vehicle that, in whatever situation, has cause to leave the road and mount the kerb is very likely to immediately collide with one of the mature trees and, secondly, the size of the trees (the circumference of their trunks) make it difficult for pedestrians, or those using mobility aides, to safely walk/move along the pavement without having to step into the road. Evidence was heard at the inquest from Motor Police Constable ████████ road casualty reduction officer for the Plymouth area (employed by Devon and Cornwall Police). MPC ████████’s unequivocal opinion was that the presence of these mature trees at this location (both on the northbound and southbound carriageways on Embankment Road, but particularly the stretch of trees at the location of this fatal incident on the northbound carriageway) is frankly dangerous from a road safety perspective. MPC ████████ stated that, in addition to this fatal accident in 2023, there was a fatal accident in 2008, where a vehicle collided with one of the trees along the same stretch of the northbound carriageway, resulting in the deaths of two occupants of the vehicle. MPC ████████ was therefore concerned that there had been three deaths arising in very similar circumstances at the same location, involving trauma brought about by vehicular collision with one of the mature trees. MPC ████████ stated that he was not aware of any other location in Plymouth where trees lining the road had been considered a contributory factor in a fatal vehicle collision. Owing to these concerns, MPC ████████ made a request that consideration is given by Plymouth City Council to removing the trees at this location. Evidence was also heard at the inquest from ████████ senior traffic engineer for street services (employed by Plymouth City Council). ████████ stated that he was aware of the concerns held by Devon and Cornwall Police regarding the mature trees and that, personally, he would also like the trees to be removed. ████████ stated that the removal of trees in Plymouth was currently ‘a political topic’ and, for the trees on Embankment Road to be removed, a decision would need to be taken justifying the use of scarce local authority public funding. ████████ accepted that there had, thus far, been no formal risk assessment or evaluation carried out by Plymouth City Council as to whether the safety concerns identified warranted resources being used to remove the trees. ████████ further accepted that this process should now take place and that he had been waiting for the outcome of this inquest before deciding upon appropriate next steps. Owing to there being clear safety concerns regarding the continued presence of these mature trees on Embankment Road, Plymouth, in my view these need to be formally considered (it is for Plymouth City Council to consider issues of risk and cost/benefit analysis of any proposed action/inaction) with a view to determining what, if anything, should happen to the trees. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of recurring collision risks at hazardous road locations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of formal risk assessment and evaluation of safety concerns relating to roadside trees

Wider context from the report

“Although the determinations at the inquest found there to be a number of relevant factors which contributed to the fatal road traffic collision and, therefore, to Jay Whiting’s death (as set out in paragraph 4, above), one such contributing factor was that the vehicle being driven by Jay Whiting left the road and immediately collided with a mature tree (one of many such trees which line Embankment Road, Plymouth). Embankment Road (or at least this particular stretch) is a dual carriageway and a main route into the city centre of Plymouth. As part of the investigation and inquest process, photos were taken of the scene by forensic collision investigating officers, and these showed the large trees to be adjacent to the dual carriageway, situated on a pavement only a matter of inches from the kerb. It is clear from these photos that, firstly, any vehicle that, in whatever situation, has cause to leave the road and mount the kerb is very likely to immediately collide with one of the mature trees and, secondly, the size of the trees (the circumference of their trunks) make it difficult for pedestrians, or those using mobility aides, to safely walk/move along the pavement without having to step into the road. Evidence was heard at the inquest from Motor Police Constable ████████ road casualty reduction officer for the Plymouth area (employed by Devon and Cornwall Police). MPC ████████’s unequivocal opinion was that the presence of these mature trees at this location (both on the northbound and southbound carriageways on Embankment Road, but particularly the stretch of trees at the location of this fatal incident on the northbound carriageway) is frankly dangerous from a road safety perspective. MPC ████████ stated that, in addition to this fatal accident in 2023, there was a fatal accident in 2008, where a vehicle collided with one of the trees along the same stretch of the northbound carriageway, resulting in the deaths of two occupants of the vehicle. MPC ████████ was therefore concerned that there had been three deaths arising in very similar circumstances at the same location, involving trauma brought about by vehicular collision with one of the mature trees. MPC ████████ stated that he was not aware of any other location in Plymouth where trees lining the road had been considered a contributory factor in a fatal vehicle collision. Owing to these concerns, MPC ████████ made a request that consideration is given by Plymouth City Council to removing the trees at this location. Evidence was also heard at the inquest from ████████ senior traffic engineer for street services (employed by Plymouth City Council). ████████ stated that he was aware of the concerns held by Devon and Cornwall Police regarding the mature trees and that, personally, he would also like the trees to be removed. ████████ stated that the removal of trees in Plymouth was currently ‘a political topic’ and, for the trees on Embankment Road to be removed, a decision would need to be taken justifying the use of scarce local authority public funding. ████████ accepted that there had, thus far, been no formal risk assessment or evaluation carried out by Plymouth City Council as to whether the safety concerns identified warranted resources being used to remove the trees. ████████ further accepted that this process should now take place and that he had been waiting for the outcome of this inquest before deciding upon appropriate next steps. Owing to there being clear safety concerns regarding the continued presence of these mature trees on Embankment Road, Plymouth, in my view these need to be formally considered (it is for Plymouth City Council to consider issues of risk and cost/benefit analysis of any proposed action/inaction) with a view to determining what, if anything, should happen to the trees. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Initiate the statutory process to extend the 30mph speed limit along approximately 800 metres of the A374 Embankment Road.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Implementation of a process to extend the 30mph Speed Limit on both sides of the A374 Embankment Road from its current terminal north-east of Stanley place to a point north-east of the Rowing Club, approximately 800 metres. This will involve the introduction of a Traffic Regulation Order (“TRO”) and as such will be subject to a statutory process which will include a statutory consultation followed by a formal decision to be taken in accordance with the Council’s constitution. If following this process the TRO is agreed, it is envisaged that the lower speed limit will be introduced at the beginning of April 2025.”

Source location

Response from Plymouth City Council
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remove specified trees beside the north-east carriageway and reconstruct approximately 450 metres of the carriageway and footway.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. We plan to remove a number of trees adjacent to the north-east bound carriageway between the Glendinning Depot and Arnold’s Point. The works for tree”

Source location

Response from Plymouth City Council
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Trees on the south-west carriageway are not considered a significant collision risk because of existing lower speeds, junction conditions and a safety camera.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of this process, the City Council has considered removal of the trees sited on the south-west bound carriageway. These trees have no history of involvement in collisions with vehicles and are also planted in a way which does not block the adjacent footway/cycleway. This section of road is in-bound towards the City Centre and currently has lower traffic speeds due to the junction with Lanhydrock Rd and the presence of a Safety Camera in advance of the junction. As the speed limit will now be dropped to 30mph with a Speed Camera in place, it is not considered that the trees on this side of the road present a significant risk and will therefore remain in place. Given the constraint on Council budgets, work on which present a significant risk of collisions must be prioritised.”

Source location

Response from Plymouth City Council
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026