PFD report

Winston Llewellyn Johns · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Oct 2013•Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to factor critical clinical information into operator advice
  2. Failure of the ambulance service computer programme to take account of critical clinical information
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ambulance-service computer systems for safety-critical information
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to factor critical clinical information into operator advice

Wider context from the report

“(1) Mr Johns son clearly confirmed the low blood sugar at the beginning of the call. This critical important information was not factored into the advice provided to him by the operator. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the ambulance service computer programme to take account of critical clinical information

Wider context from the report

“(2) The computer programme used by the ambulance service does not take into account critical clinical information as a result the operator incorrectly advised CPR despite the risks that entails. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ambulance-service computer systems for safety-critical information.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.