PFD report

Sienna Scarlett Monterio · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Sep 2023•Blackpool and the Fylde

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to make haemoglobin analysis available in neonatal resuscitation cord blood gas testing
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable cord blood testing for newborn safety assessment
  2. Lack of national regulation and Newborn Life Support process inclusion for cord blood testing
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable cord blood testing for newborn safety assessment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make haemoglobin analysis available in neonatal resuscitation cord blood gas testing

Wider context from the report

“Having reviewed the circumstances surrounding Sienna’s death, the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch [HSIB] found that at the time of birth the blood gas analyser was not set to analyse the haemoglobin. The HSIB very clearly state that in the absence of this data, this “prevented other possible causes for the Baby’s condition being considered and possibly corrected.” The HSIB has also recommended this facility is available in all neonatal resuscitation settings to support the provision of clinical information, and to optimise decision making processes and clinical care. Sienna was born following an urgent caesarean section, and died within two hours of delivery. Those who work in this area inevitably have to make urgent, life-saving decisions and in the most challenging of circumstances, and it seems to me that there is a lack of clarity on this issue which needs to be addressed. In the absence of such clarity, a baby may die from a preventable cause which is not appreciated by clinicians in the absence of data which would have highlighted a low haemoglobin level in the blood cord gas. It appears that in some trusts, this data will be readily available, but not in others. If ████████ comment above is correct, there may be different practices within the one trust. The court has been told that cord blood testing is not regulated or included in the Newborn Life Support (NLS) process at a national level. It appears as though the hospital trust in Blackpool is considering this issue appropriately, and this may reflect the picture nationally. The HSIB states this data may assist in identifying other possible causes for a baby’s condition being considered, and possibly corrected. ████████ expresses the view that he sees no potential disadvantage in having the Hb measurement being readily available in the cord blood gas from a clinical perspective. I have therefore concluded that there is risk of future deaths and that I therefore have a duty to write this report. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable cord blood testing for newborn safety assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national regulation and Newborn Life Support process inclusion for cord blood testing

Wider context from the report

“Having reviewed the circumstances surrounding Sienna’s death, the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch [HSIB] found that at the time of birth the blood gas analyser was not set to analyse the haemoglobin. The HSIB very clearly state that in the absence of this data, this “prevented other possible causes for the Baby’s condition being considered and possibly corrected.” The HSIB has also recommended this facility is available in all neonatal resuscitation settings to support the provision of clinical information, and to optimise decision making processes and clinical care. Sienna was born following an urgent caesarean section, and died within two hours of delivery. Those who work in this area inevitably have to make urgent, life-saving decisions and in the most challenging of circumstances, and it seems to me that there is a lack of clarity on this issue which needs to be addressed. In the absence of such clarity, a baby may die from a preventable cause which is not appreciated by clinicians in the absence of data which would have highlighted a low haemoglobin level in the blood cord gas. It appears that in some trusts, this data will be readily available, but not in others. If ████████ comment above is correct, there may be different practices within the one trust. The court has been told that cord blood testing is not regulated or included in the Newborn Life Support (NLS) process at a national level. It appears as though the hospital trust in Blackpool is considering this issue appropriately, and this may reflect the picture nationally. The HSIB states this data may assist in identifying other possible causes for a baby’s condition being considered, and possibly corrected. ████████ expresses the view that he sees no potential disadvantage in having the Hb measurement being readily available in the cord blood gas from a clinical perspective. I have therefore concluded that there is risk of future deaths and that I therefore have a duty to write this report. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable cord blood testing for newborn safety assessment.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.