O’Shea Medad Dover · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Feb 2024•North London

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure of national JRCALC guidance to address conveyance to an obstetrics unit when delivery is not progressing

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Association of Ambulance Chief Executives

    Update the guidance after review and issue the revised content as a clinical update through the App following required approvals.

  2. Association of Ambulance Chief Executives

    Review two maternal-care guidelines to address conveying patients when delivery is not progressing, consulting obstetric, midwifery and national maternity experts.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Department of Health and Social Care

    Responsibility for reviewing ambulance-service concerns and taking action lies with NHS England and the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. Association of Ambulance Chief Executives

    AACE is not constituted to mandate or instruct ambulance services regarding implementation of national guidance.

    Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  3. Association of Ambulance Chief Executives

    The decision whether to convey a patient would remain with attending clinicians because individual circumstances may differ.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of national JRCALC guidance to address conveyance to an obstetrics unit when delivery is not progressing

Wider context from the report

“1. Consideration to be given for the national JRCALC guidance to include the London Ambulance Service’s JRCALC Plus recommendation that where delivery is not progressing the patient should be conveyed to an obstetrics unit; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the guidance after review and issue the revised content as a clinical update through the App following required approvals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The guidance will be updated following the review we have commenced, and this is expected to take around three months. When the guidance is updated it will be issued as a clinical update onto the App following our usual process which involves approvals from JRCALC and our National Ambulance Medical Directors group (NASMeD).”

Source location

Response from Association of Amblance
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review two maternal-care guidelines to address conveying patients when delivery is not progressing, consulting obstetric, midwifery and national maternity experts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are consulting with our expert advisors for our JRCALC guidance, obstetricians and midwives and the NHS England National Maternity team.”

Source location

Response from Association of Amblance
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for reviewing ambulance-service concerns and taking action lies with NHS England and the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“My officials have raised these concerns with NHS England (NHSE) as the body responsible for the oversight of the operational delivery of ambulance services nationally. NHS England have responded to confirm that they are working with the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) to support their review of the concerns you have raised. I understand that AACE will be responding to you shortly on the action being taken.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

AACE is not constituted to mandate or instruct ambulance services regarding implementation of national guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It may be helpful for us to explain that AACE is a private company owned by the English and Welsh NHS ambulance service. Its purpose is to support its members, UK NHS ambulance services, in the implementation of national agreed policy and to act as an interface, where appropriate at a national level, between them and their stakeholders. It is a company owned by NHS organisations and possesses the intellectual property rights of the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee UK ambulance service clinical practice guidelines (the “JRCALC guidelines”). AACE is not constituted to mandate or instruct ambulance services however it has national influence via the regular meetings of ambulance chief executives and chairs along with a network of national specialist sub-groups.”

Source location

Response from Association of Amblance
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The decision whether to convey a patient would remain with attending clinicians because individual circumstances may differ.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of the learning from this incident two guidelines are now under review and will take into account the matters of concern you have raised about conveying the patient if delivery is not progressing. The decision whether to move the patient may differ in every individual situation and would continue to be made by the attending clinicians.”

Source location

Response from Association of Amblance
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026