PFD report

Susan Sterland · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Jan 2020•Northamptonshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to provide senior doctor review for deteriorating patients
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient carePart of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely medical review of emergency-department patientsPart of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Increase daily senior decision-making capacity by adding middle-grade shifts and a second consultant shift in the Emergency Department.

    Stated by Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 March 2020.
  2. Action

    Ratify and implement an updated ED standard operating policy defining responsibility for each patient and escalation arrangements.

    Stated by Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 March 2020.
  3. Action

    Create a new EDU operating policy specifying consultant ward-round responsibility, patient ownership and risks identified in the report before recommissioning.

    Stated by Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 20 March 2020.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide senior doctor review for deteriorating patients

Wider context from the report

“This was obviously a very busy time at the hospital. However, Ms Sterland was in the hospital for some 40 hours, she was not getting better, there were signs that she was deteriorating during the late morning and afternoon of 30 December, there was a plan to admit her to a ward but there were no beds available. My concern is that in this situation she was not seen by a senior doctor. If Ms Sterland had been seen by a senior doctor the evidence was that she would have had further investigation which would have led to earlier diagnosis of the obstruction and may have altered the outcome. The evidence at the inquest suggested that there are some categories of patients in the emergency department for whom a senior review is mandatory. It may be that the Trust would wish to consider whether the circumstances of this case suggest that there are other situations in which a senior review should be required. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care; Failure to provide timely medical review of emergency-department patients; Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase daily senior decision-making capacity by adding middle-grade shifts and a second consultant shift in the Emergency Department.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department medical rota has been changed to increase the number of senior decision makers present within the department on each day. As a result the number of middle-grade shifts has been increased from 9 to 11 shifts, daily. In addition, the number of consultants in the department has been increased by adding a second consultant shift from 15:00 to 22.00 and we are aiming to have 2 consultants in ED from 08:00 to 22.00. This will allow a timely senior review of patients and will provide consultant ward rounds for EDU.”

Source location

2020-0062-Response-from-Kettering-General-Hospital_Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 20 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ratify and implement an updated ED standard operating policy defining responsibility for each patient and escalation arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. A revision to the Standard Operating Practice to set out who is responsible for reviewing patients:”

Source location

2020-0062-Response-from-Kettering-General-Hospital_Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 20 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create a new EDU operating policy specifying consultant ward-round responsibility, patient ownership and risks identified in the report before recommissioning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The EDU was decommissioned in March 2020 in response to Covid 19. The area where EDU was located is currently being used as ED Major cubicles which are part of the ED footprint.”

Source location

2020-0062-Response-from-Kettering-General-Hospital_Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 20 March 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026