PFD report

Thomas Geoffrey WAKEFIELD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Apr 2024•Cheshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure of diagnostic guidance to require consideration and exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm when diagnosing acute pancreatitis
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise acute abdominal emergenciesPart of recurring concern: Inadequate detection and management of abdominal aortic aneurysmsPart of recurring concern: Inadequate recognition controls for atypical aortic emergencies
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Review pancreatitis guideline section 1.2 and consider revising wording about raised lipase or amylase levels and alternative conditions.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 April 2024.
  2. Action

    Review the coroner’s concerns about clinical guidance for abdominal aortic aneurysm and acute pancreatitis.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2024.
  3. Action

    Amend the pancreatitis guideline to clarify that raised lipase or amylase levels support diagnosis but may occur in other conditions.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Guidelines cannot cover all differential diagnoses because each guideline has a defined scope relating to specific medical conditions.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of diagnostic guidance to require consideration and exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm when diagnosing acute pancreatitis

Wider context from the report

“During a review of the NICE guidelines entitled “Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: diagnosis and management”, and the international guidance, it became apparent that there is a lack of caution within the guidance about the recognised risk that abdominal aortic aneurysm and acute pancreatitis are known to be diagnosed misidentified by clinicians. These conditions can have similar presenting features. Whilst the guidance states that if there is uncertainty about a diagnosis of pancreatitis as not all criteria are met, imaging tests should be undertaken, this does not specifically require the exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm which is fatal if untreated. The clinical presentation alongside amylase results in this case met the criteria for a diagnosis of pancreatitis. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise acute abdominal emergencies; Inadequate detection and management of abdominal aortic aneurysms; Inadequate recognition controls for atypical aortic emergencies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review pancreatitis guideline section 1.2 and consider revising wording about raised lipase or amylase levels and alternative conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are therefore going to take the following action:”

Source location

Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 2 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the coroner’s concerns about clinical guidance for abdominal aortic aneurysm and acute pancreatitis.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your Report raises the concern that existing clinical guidance does not provide the adequate caution about the recognised risk or diagnoses for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and acute pancreatitis.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the pancreatitis guideline to clarify that raised lipase or amylase levels support diagnosis but may occur in other conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further to your regulation 28 report dated 2 May 2024 regarding the very sad death of Thomas Geoffrey Wakefield, I am writing to update on progress taken since our response dated 25 June 2024. In this we committed to amend our guideline for pancreatitis (NG104) from “Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is confirmed by testing blood lipase or amylase levels, which are usually raised” to ‘A diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is supported by testing blood lipase or amylase levels, which are usually raised, although raised blood lipase or amylase levels may occur in other conditions’.”

Source location

2025 Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Guidelines cannot cover all differential diagnoses because each guideline has a defined scope relating to specific medical conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is important to add that NICE guidelines cannot cover all clinical circumstances, and each guideline has a clearly set out and agreed scope. Our guidelines relate to specific medical conditions, and therefore cannot cover all possible differential diagnoses. Responsibility for decisions on the most appropriate treatment stays with individual clinicians, whose role it is to use their professional experience and training to make the correct decision on treatment for each of their patients. NICE guidelines are a practical tool to be used in conjunction with and not as a substitute for clinical judgement.”

Source location

Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 2 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Individual clinicians are responsible for treatment decisions, using professional experience, training and clinical judgement alongside NICE guidelines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is important to add that NICE guidelines cannot cover all clinical circumstances, and each guideline has a clearly set out and agreed scope. Our guidelines relate to specific medical conditions, and therefore cannot cover all possible differential diagnoses. Responsibility for decisions on the most appropriate treatment stays with individual clinicians, whose role it is to use their professional experience and training to make the correct decision on treatment for each of their patients. NICE guidelines are a practical tool to be used in conjunction with and not as a substitute for clinical judgement.”

Source location

Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 2 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Concerns about relevant clinical guidelines should be referred to the organisations responsible for producing them.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The responsibility for the relevant clinical guidelines does not fall within the remit of NHS England, who are independent of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Royal Colleges. NHS England would therefore suggest that the coroner refer their concerns to the responsible organisations.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for relevant clinical guidelines falls outside NHS England’s remit and authority.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The responsibility for the relevant clinical guidelines does not fall within the remit of NHS England, who are independent of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Royal Colleges. NHS England would therefore suggest that the coroner refer their concerns to the responsible organisations.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Share key learnings and insights from Prevention of Future Deaths reports across the national and regional NHS.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2024.
  2. 2

    Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share key learnings and insights from Prevention of Future Deaths reports across the national and regional NHS.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026