PFD report

Brian CHAPMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Jan 2024•Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of required passenger seatbelts on buses undertaking predominantly rural, high-speed journeys
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate vehicle occupant restraint systems
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Write to the Office of the Traffic Commissioner to raise awareness of appropriate vehicle selection and seat-belt provision.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2024.
  2. Action

    Write to the Confederation of Passenger Transport highlighting appropriate vehicle selection, including consideration of seat-belt-fitted vehicles.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Traffic commissioners must determine whether their powers can restrict particular buses from particular roads through Traffic Regulation Conditions.

    Stated by Department for TransportRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of required passenger seatbelts on buses undertaking predominantly rural, high-speed journeys

Wider context from the report

“One of the two vehicles involved in the collision was a double decker service bus travelling a scheduled route between Peterborough and Norwich, a distance of approximately 80 miles. The bus was not fitted with passenger seatbelts. I heard evidence that although since 01.01.01 seatbelts are required to be fitted in all new buses(this vehicle was on a ‘63’ plate’) there is an exemption where such vehicles are designed for urban use standing passengers. Whilst this particular route required the bus to travel from/to and stop off in 5-6 urban centres the majority of the journey took place on a major A route through rural areas. The speed of the bus at the point of collision was approximately 53mph. Both the bus driver and an upper deck passenger were killed in the collision. Whilst there was no evidence that either death would have been prevented by the wearing of seatbelts a number of other passengers were injured in the collision. I am concerned where buses are undertaking journeys such as this through predominantly rural locations and subject to the national speed limit without seatbelts being required there is an obvious risk of death to passengers if collisions occur, particularly at high speed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate vehicle occupant restraint systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write to the Office of the Traffic Commissioner to raise awareness of appropriate vehicle selection and seat-belt provision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, my officials will write immediately to the CPT, the trade body which represents bus and coach operators, highlighting the importance for their members in selecting appropriate vehicles based on the type of bus service operated, including full consideration of using only vehicles fitted with seat belts. At that same time they will also write to the Office of the Traffic Commissioner to raise awareness of this issue.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write to the Confederation of Passenger Transport highlighting appropriate vehicle selection, including consideration of seat-belt-fitted vehicles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, my officials will write immediately to the CPT, the trade body which represents bus and coach operators, highlighting the importance for their members in selecting appropriate vehicles based on the type of bus service operated, including full consideration of using only vehicles fitted with seat belts. At that same time they will also write to the Office of the Traffic Commissioner to raise awareness of this issue.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Traffic commissioners must determine whether their powers can restrict particular buses from particular roads through Traffic Regulation Conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Traffic Commissioners are responsible for licensing and regulation of those who operate buses and the registration of most bus services. On the request of a local transport authority, a traffic commissioner can consider the potential use of Traffic Regulation Conditions (TRCs) to prevent danger to road users. It would be for the individual traffic commissioners to determine whether their powers could extend to the use of a TRC to restrict certain buses from particular roads.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Standard-service operators are responsible for choosing vehicles appropriate to the intended operation; local authorities may specify vehicle requirements for contracted services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Once a bus is approved for use there are no specific regulations to restrict the type of roads it can use and for standard bus services it is for the operator to choose the type of vehicle used to provide a given service, and this should take account of the type of intended operation. Exceptions to this”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The existing regulatory framework provides appropriate and proportionate safeguards, so no broader regulatory change is considered necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Overall, we believe the existing regulatory framework is appropriate as it harmonises vehicle construction with the wider international community and provides proportionate safeguards whilst ensuring the legislative landscape is sufficiently flexible to meet the needs of the local community. This ensures the economic viability and sustainability of bus services, which in turn supports social inclusion and the local economy, particularly in rural areas.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026