PFD report

David John Pooley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Nov 2015•Essex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to allocate a named nurse
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable named-nurse allocation and identification
  2. Failure to carry out the named nurse role
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide continuity of patient care
  3. Failure to carry out appropriate assessments and reviews
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to allocate a named nurse

Wider context from the report

“1. Contrary to the trust’s policy, there was no named nurse allocated until the day before Mr Pooley’s death. The role of the named nurse had not therefore been carried out – this entails the devising of a risk assessment, care plans, one to ones, contact with the patient’s family etc. 2. The appropriate assessments and reviews were therefore not carried out. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable named-nurse allocation and identification.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to carry out the named nurse role

Wider context from the report

“1. Contrary to the trust’s policy, there was no named nurse allocated until the day before Mr Pooley’s death. The role of the named nurse had not therefore been carried out – this entails the devising of a risk assessment, care plans, one to ones, contact with the patient’s family etc. 2. The appropriate assessments and reviews were therefore not carried out. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide continuity of patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to carry out appropriate assessments and reviews

Wider context from the report

“1. Contrary to the trust’s policy, there was no named nurse allocated until the day before Mr Pooley’s death. The role of the named nurse had not therefore been carried out – this entails the devising of a risk assessment, care plans, one to ones, contact with the patient’s family etc. 2. The appropriate assessments and reviews were therefore not carried out. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.