PFD report

JORDAN LEE ROBERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Feb 2015•County Durham and Darlington

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Inadequate warning signage for river-path users about the deep pool and strong currents
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate warnings about location-specific hazards at public waterside locations
  2. Particularly deep pool with strong currents in the River Wear
    Part of recurring concern: Uncontrolled dangerous currents affecting swimmers
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Complete a safety assessment of the northern section of the river bank.

    Stated by Durham County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 February 2015.
  2. Action

    Improve sections of fencing along the northern river bank near the footbridge.

    Stated by Durham County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 February 2015.
  3. Action

    Replace existing warning signs with larger hazard signs at three key northern river-bank locations and maintain them through ongoing inspection and replacement.

    Stated by Durham County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 February 2015.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate warning signage for river-path users about the deep pool and strong currents

Wider context from the report

“(1) The depth of the water in the River Wear which the three young men waded through is not particularly deep or particularly hazardous except where there is this particularly deep pool where the dangers are also compounded by strong currents. There is one warning sign on the Finchale Abbey side of the river but people walking down the well established river path on the County Council river bank side would be unaware of this sign and the three small square warning signs that are in place seem inadequate and not fit for purpose particularly bearing in mind that the water bailiff himself was unaware of their existence. Consideration therefore should be given to the question of the erection of appropriate warning signs on both sides of the River Wear in this area particularly highlighting known dangers of this particularly deep expanse of water. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate warnings about location-specific hazards at public waterside locations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Particularly deep pool with strong currents in the River Wear

Wider context from the report

“(1) The depth of the water in the River Wear which the three young men waded through is not particularly deep or particularly hazardous except where there is this particularly deep pool where the dangers are also compounded by strong currents. There is one warning sign on the Finchale Abbey side of the river but people walking down the well established river path on the County Council river bank side would be unaware of this sign and the three small square warning signs that are in place seem inadequate and not fit for purpose particularly bearing in mind that the water bailiff himself was unaware of their existence. Consideration therefore should be given to the question of the erection of appropriate warning signs on both sides of the River Wear in this area particularly highlighting known dangers of this particularly deep expanse of water. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Uncontrolled dangerous currents affecting swimmers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a safety assessment of the northern section of the river bank.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the tragic death of Jordan Lee Roberts, a safety assessment of the northern section of the river bank has been undertaken by Durham County Council. The assessment process has also involved a Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (ROSPA) consultant. ROSPA have also been engaged by the Durham City Safety Group to undertake an independent review of river safety in Durham City Centre. As part of this process, ROSPA are also reviewing various other locations across the County including Finchale Abbey.”

Source location

2015-0042-Response-by-Durham-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 6 February 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve sections of fencing along the northern river bank near the footbridge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Furthermore, additional work will also be undertaken to improve sections of fencing along the northern side of river bank in the vicinity of the footbridge. Information will also be provided on the Durham County Council Cocken Wood picnic area webpages regarding the hazards associated with the river, particularly for those visiting this attraction that may be unaware.”

Source location

2015-0042-Response-by-Durham-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 6 February 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replace existing warning signs with larger hazard signs at three key northern river-bank locations and maintain them through ongoing inspection and replacement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The safety assessment has resulted in actions being taken to replace the existing warning signs which were identified in the matters of concern. Larger, improved hazard warning signs have been erected at 3 key locations along the northern river bank. This will warn river path users that there are river related hazards, specifically strong currents and deep water. The signs being erected are in accordance with The Health and Safety (Safety Signs and Signals) Regulations and ROSPA national water safety signage specification for public areas. All signs will be subject to ongoing inspection and monitoring regimes and replacements will be erected on an ongoing basis where required.”

Source location

2015-0042-Response-by-Durham-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 6 February 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Communicate the northern river-bank safety actions to the adjacent landowner through a site meeting.

    Stated by Durham County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 February 2015.
  2. 2

    Provide river-hazard information on the Cocken Wood picnic-area webpages.

    Stated by Durham County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 February 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate the northern river-bank safety actions to the adjacent landowner through a site meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to raise as much awareness as possible to the dangers of the river, the actions being taken by the Council on the Northern side of the river bank have also been communicated to the adjacent landowner ████████, at a site meeting on 27 February 2015.”

Source location

2015-0042-Response-by-Durham-County-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 6 February 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide river-hazard information on the Cocken Wood picnic-area webpages.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Furthermore, additional work will also be undertaken to improve sections of fencing along the northern side of river bank in the vicinity of the footbridge. Information will also be provided on the Durham County Council Cocken Wood picnic area webpages regarding the hazards associated with the river, particularly for those visiting this attraction that may be unaware.”

Source location

2015-0042-Response-by-Durham-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 6 February 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026