PFD report

Shirley Ann HUNT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Mar 2024•York and North Yorkshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of legal requirements for restraint of passengers travelling in the rear areas of motorhomes
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate vehicle occupant restraint systems
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Require seat belts for all travelling seats in newly registered motor caravans and identify unsuitable unbelted seats with signage.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 March 2024.
  2. Action

    Publish guidance advising motor-caravan passengers to use forward- or rearward-facing seats equipped with three-point seat belts.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 March 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The existing regulatory framework is considered proportionate and sufficient for the range and age of motor caravans operating on the roads.

    Stated by Department for TransportExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of legal requirements for restraint of passengers travelling in the rear areas of motorhomes

Wider context from the report

“Evidence given during the inquest indicated that there is no legal obligation for seat belts to be fitted in the rear areas of motorhomes, for passengers to use when the vehicle is in motion. Whilst it was not possible to establish whether Shirley Ann Hunt would have survived the impact if she had been wearing a seatbelt, as a wider point of public safety, I am concerned that adults and children over three years can travel in the rear areas of motorhomes without restraint, and that in doing so, this may create a risk to life. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate vehicle occupant restraint systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require seat belts for all travelling seats in newly registered motor caravans and identify unsuitable unbelted seats with signage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From 29 April 2012, newly registered motor caravans have required all seats intended for use when the vehicle is travelling, irrespective of whether they are fitted to the accommodation area or elsewhere in the vehicle, to be fitted with seat belts. Seats which are not suitable for use whilst travelling and not fitted with seat belts must be clearly identified to users by means of a pictogram or a sign with appropriate text.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 25 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish guidance advising motor-caravan passengers to use forward- or rearward-facing seats equipped with three-point seat belts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although it is not illegal to travel unrestrained in the accommodation area of a motor caravan where no seat belts are fitted, the Department has published guidance at the following link which advises that passengers are safest in a forward or rearward facing seat equipped with a three-point seat belt. www.gov.uk/government/publications/carriage-of-passengers-in-campervans”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 25 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The existing regulatory framework is considered proportionate and sufficient for the range and age of motor caravans operating on the roads.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Overall, I believe the existing regulatory framework is proportionate as it introduced enhanced requirements for new motor caravans from 2012 and provides sufficient in-use provision to cover the broad range and age of motor caravans operating on our roads.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 25 March 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Consider further options to help prevent similar occurrences in future.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 March 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider further options to help prevent similar occurrences in future.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, I have asked my officials to consider what further options might be possible and appropriate to help prevent similar occurrences in future.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 25 March 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026