PFD report

Ms Pauline Verona Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Dec 2014•Inner West London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to provide appropriate supervision for EU-trained doctors
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to supervise clinicians during clinical work
  2. Inability to ensure equivalence of EU-trained doctors’ qualifications, training and experience
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Work with the GMC to establish a robust process for considering additions to Annex 5 medical specialties before agreeing to list comparable UK specialties.

    Stated by Dr Dan Poulter MPStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2014.
  2. Action

    Work with the GMC to strengthen processes confirming equivalent curriculum content for EU medical specialties and suitable standards for patient safety.

    Stated by Dr Dan Poulter MPStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2014.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Health Education England is the appropriate body to comment on St George’s training and supervision programme.

    Stated by Dr Dan Poulter MPRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide appropriate supervision for EU-trained doctors

Wider context from the report

“(1) That UK Hospitals are forced by EU law to accept the qualifications of EU trained doctors even though such doctors may not have the same training and experience as an equivalently graded doctor in the UK (2) That UK Hospitals are unaware of this and thus allow such doctors to practice unsupervised and thus put patients’ lives at increased risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to supervise clinicians during clinical work.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inability to ensure equivalence of EU-trained doctors’ qualifications, training and experience

Wider context from the report

“(1) That UK Hospitals are forced by EU law to accept the qualifications of EU trained doctors even though such doctors may not have the same training and experience as an equivalently graded doctor in the UK (2) That UK Hospitals are unaware of this and thus allow such doctors to practice unsupervised and thus put patients’ lives at increased risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with the GMC to establish a robust process for considering additions to Annex 5 medical specialties before agreeing to list comparable UK specialties.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department is also working with the GMC to make sure there is a robust process for considering new additions to the medical specialties listed in Annex 5 of the Directive before the UK agrees to list its own comparable specialty.”

Source location

2014-0547-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with the GMC to strengthen processes confirming equivalent curriculum content for EU medical specialties and suitable standards for patient safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, the Department is aware that the General Medical Council (GMC) has some concerns around the comparability of curriculum between some of the UK specialties and specialties in other Member States listed under Annex 5. Subsequently officials at the Department of Health are working with the GMC to strengthen the processes around confirming that medical specialties have equivalent curriculum content to ensure that EU doctors working in the UK are of a suitable standard to maintain patient safety.”

Source location

2014-0547-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Health Education England is the appropriate body to comment on St George’s training and supervision programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Health Education England (HEE) is the appropriate body to comment on the training and supervision programme run by St. George’s hospital. They consider this induction programme, which features increased initial supervision and mandatory sign-off for non-UK trained staff before they can go onto any rota appears thorough and could be disseminated as an example of good practice. However, whilst HEE provides national, strategic leadership on education and training that is responsive to patient’s changing needs, primary responsibility for induction arrangements for clinical staff rests with individual employers.”

Source location

2014-0547-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Primary responsibility for induction arrangements for clinical staff rests with individual employers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Health Education England (HEE) is the appropriate body to comment on the training and supervision programme run by St. George’s hospital. They consider this induction programme, which features increased initial supervision and mandatory sign-off for non-UK trained staff before they can go onto any rota appears thorough and could be disseminated as an example of good practice. However, whilst HEE provides national, strategic leadership on education and training that is responsive to patient’s changing needs, primary responsibility for induction arrangements for clinical staff rests with individual employers.”

Source location

2014-0547-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026