PFD report

Sienna Daisy Barber · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 May 2023•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
4

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of NICE guidance for diagnosing and treating Group A Streptococcus in high-risk groups
  2. Failure to consider rapid antigen testing for Group A Streptococcus in children under 5
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Endorse the reinstatement of NICE sore-throat guidance following clinical risk-benefit review.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  2. Action

    Produce clinical guidelines covering assessment and management of children presenting with fever, sepsis and acute sore throat.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  3. Action

    Publish diagnostic guidance on rapid tests for group A streptococcal infections in people with a sore throat.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 February 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    Further comment on or interference with NICE recommendations and processes is not appropriate because NICE is independent.

    Stated by Maria Caulfield MPOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of NICE guidance for diagnosing and treating Group A Streptococcus in high-risk groups

Wider context from the report

“1. The court heard evidence that since 2014 cases of Group A Streptococcus have increased annually. After Sienna’s death in December 2022 there was a significant increase of cases in young children. Whilst emergency guidance was issued to practitioners in December 2022 this related to the threshold for the administration of treatment in cases where Group A Streptococcus. This guidance has itself now been withdrawn. The court heard that unlike other conditions such as Meningitis there is no NICE guidance for practitioners to assist them with how to diagnose / treat Group A Streptococcus. Apparently there has been previous consideration of this but a decision was taken not to provide such guidance. The court was advised this decision was taken having considered the impact of Group A Streptococcus on the whole of the population. However the court informed that there are three high risk groups, these being ; i) Children under the age of 5, ii) women who have given birth in the last month and iii) the over 75’s. In my opinion consideration of guidance targeted towards these three high risk groups should be considered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider rapid antigen testing for Group A Streptococcus in children under 5

Wider context from the report

“2. The court also heard that in 2019 a NICE publication considering rapid antigen testing was published. This did not recommend rapid antigen testing. However this publication excluded consideration of testing in the high risk group, the under 5’s. Rapid antigen testing is carried out in other countries such as the USA and Canada. The court heard Sienna would have been entirely the sort of patient where such testing would have been appropriate on the 25th January 2022 when she was examined at North Manchester and she would have immediately been commenced on the treatment for Group A streptococcus, penicillin. In my opinion consideration should be given for rapid antigen testing in the under 5’s in such cases. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Endorse the reinstatement of NICE sore-throat guidance following clinical risk-benefit review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It was the case that interim guidance was withdrawn following the spike in Group A Streptococcus in December 2022, and replaced by the reinstatement of the NICE Sore Throat (Acute) NG84 guideline for all age groups¹.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce clinical guidelines covering assessment and management of children presenting with fever, sepsis and acute sore throat.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have produced several guidelines to help clinicians treating children presenting with fever and symptoms such as those in the case of Sienna. These include: fever in under 5s: assessment and initial management [NG143], sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management [NG51] and sore throat (acute): antimicrobial prescribing [NG84].”

Source location

Response from Nation Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish diagnostic guidance on rapid tests for group A streptococcal infections in people with a sore throat.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you have said in your report, we have also published diagnostic guidance on rapid tests for group A streptococcal infections in people with a sore throat [DG38]. We were unable to recommend the tests for routine adoption for people with a sore throat. This is because their effect on patient outcomes as compared with clinical scoring tools alone, and their potential effect on antimicrobial prescribing and stewardship, is likely to be limited.”

Source location

Response from Nation Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Further comment on or interference with NICE recommendations and processes is not appropriate because NICE is independent.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In your report, you raised concerns about the lack of guidance to specifically diagnose and treat group A streptococcus infection, as well as around NICE’s publication of guidance in 2019 which did not recommend rapid tests for group A streptococcal infections in people with a sore throat. I am aware that NICE has responded to your report, citing relevant existing guidelines and the rationale for the negative recommendation on the rapid tests. I also understand from NICE that it engaged in discussions with both NHS England and the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). I hope that the response provided by NICE has sufficiently addressed your concerns. Given NICE’s independence, I hope you will understand that it would not be appropriate for me to comment further on NICE’s recommendations or interfere in its processes.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing NICE fever guidance is viewed as robust and supports appropriate antibiotic decisions for children under five.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It was the case that interim guidance was withdrawn following the spike in Group A Streptococcus in December 2022, and replaced by the reinstatement of the NICE Sore Throat (Acute) NG84 guideline for all age groups¹.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Other government bodies refer topics to NICE for consideration in its work programme according to established national priorities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have not yet been asked to produce a guideline on group A streptococcus specifically. Topics for the NICE work programme are referred to NICE by the Department of Health and Social Care, NHS England and other government departments in line with the national priorities that they have established.”

Source location

Response from Nation Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Routine adoption of rapid group A streptococcal tests was not recommended because outcome and antimicrobial-stewardship benefits were likely limited.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you have said in your report, we have also published diagnostic guidance on rapid tests for group A streptococcal infections in people with a sore throat [DG38]. We were unable to recommend the tests for routine adoption for people with a sore throat. This is because their effect on patient outcomes as compared with clinical scoring tools alone, and their potential effect on antimicrobial prescribing and stewardship, is likely to be limited.”

Source location

Response from Nation Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing NICE guidelines address fever and early management regardless of pathogen, so separate group A streptococcus guidance is not indicated.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have produced several guidelines to help clinicians treating children presenting with fever and symptoms such as those in the case of Sienna. These include: fever in under 5s: assessment and initial management [NG143], sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management [NG51] and sore throat (acute): antimicrobial prescribing [NG84].”

Source location

Response from Nation Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Run a campaign informing parents and carers about Group A Streptococcus symptoms and appropriate responses.

    Stated by Maria Caulfield MPStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  2. 2

    Implement Martha’s Rule at least 100 acute or specialist NHS sites in England by March 2025.

    Stated by Maria Caulfield MPStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  3. 3

    Share the report and anticipated NICE response with the Clinical Quality in Practice group for discussion.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  4. 4

    Discuss the report and learning with senior RCPCH and paediatric emergency medicine colleagues.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  5. 5

    Share report information for learning with the British Paediatric Allergy, Immunity and Infection Group.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  6. 6

    Share report information and local improvement suggestions with paediatric members through the patient safety portal.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  7. 7

    Liaised with regional child-death and public-health teams to raise concerns about clinician awareness and management of Group A streptococcal disease.

    Stated by Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 February 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run a campaign informing parents and carers about Group A Streptococcus symptoms and appropriate responses.

Verbatim wording from the response

“the end of 2022, NHS England published interim clinical guidance on the diagnosis and treatment of children with Group A Streptococcus on 9 December 2022. We also commenced a campaign intended to inform parents and carers about the symptoms of Group A”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement Martha’s Rule at least 100 acute or specialist NHS sites in England by March 2025.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Secondly, in February the Government and NHS England announced plans to implement Martha’s Rule in at least 100 acute or specialist NHS sites in England by March 2025. Martha’s Rule is an initiative that gives patients and their families who are concerned about deterioration in their physiological condition the right to initiate a rapid review of their case 24 hours a day from someone outside of their immediate care team. When requested, this rapid review will inform whether any new or additional action needs to be taken to help ensure patients receive the most appropriate care and treatment – which may include escalation.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the report and anticipated NICE response with the Clinical Quality in Practice group for discussion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Sharing information and learning for quality improvement”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the report and learning with senior RCPCH and paediatric emergency medicine colleagues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Thank you for sharing your Report with us regarding the tragic and untimely passing of Sienna Daisy Barber. We were saddened to read the circumstances surrounding Sienna’s death and have discussed with senior colleagues within the RCPCH and the Association of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, as well as sharing the information for learning with the British Paediatric Allergy, Immunity and Infection Group.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share report information for learning with the British Paediatric Allergy, Immunity and Infection Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Thank you for sharing your Report with us regarding the tragic and untimely passing of Sienna Daisy Barber. We were saddened to read the circumstances surrounding Sienna’s death and have discussed with senior colleagues within the RCPCH and the Association of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, as well as sharing the information for learning with the British Paediatric Allergy, Immunity and Infection Group.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share report information and local improvement suggestions with paediatric members through the patient safety portal.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Sharing information and learning for quality improvement”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Liaised with regional child-death and public-health teams to raise concerns about clinician awareness and management of Group A streptococcal disease.

Verbatim wording from the response

“MFT are concerned at the need for better clinician awareness and understanding of the ways in which GAS can present, and its optimal management. We have liaised with Greater Manchester Sudden Unexpected Death of a Child team, Public Health England, and Greater Manchester Child Death Overview Panel to raise our concerns. Given the incidence of iGAS is five times that of meningococcal disease, the case fatality ratio is double, the incidence is increasing year on year (other than during lockdown), and the wide variety of ways it can present, there is a need for comprehensive, nationwide guidance for clinicians on the condition.”

Source location

Response from Manchester University Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
4/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026