PFD report

Alexandra Bronte Roberts · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Jan 2025•Cheshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Inability to prescribe smaller quantities of insulin
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to apply overdose-risk safeguards to medication prescribingPart of recurring concern: Medication quantity controls failing to prevent unsafe access to excessive amounts
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The MHRA is the more appropriate organisation to respond to concerns about the insulin doses currently available to patients.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inability to prescribe smaller quantities of insulin

Wider context from the report

“1. The minimum amount of insulin available to be prescribed at the time of Alex’s death was 300 units, amounting to around 10 days of medication for Alex, enabling her to take a large overdose. The Court heard evidence that had it been possible to prescribe a smaller amount, the smaller amount would have been prescribed so as to reduce the risk of overdose. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to apply overdose-risk safeguards to medication prescribing; Medication quantity controls failing to prevent unsafe access to excessive amounts.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The MHRA is the more appropriate organisation to respond to concerns about the insulin doses currently available to patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As your Report notes, the smallest quantity of insulin within a single pen device is currently 300 units of insulin. You may wish to refer to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) as the UK’s regulator of medicines regarding your concerns, as they would be the more appropriate organisation to respond on the insulin doses currently available to patients.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 9 January 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share resulting safety learning across the NHS.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 January 2025.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Providing further comment or clinical opinion on the individual case is outside the organisation’s remit given the information provided.

    Stated by NHS EnglandOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share resulting safety learning across the NHS.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Alex, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 9 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Providing further comment or clinical opinion on the individual case is outside the organisation’s remit given the information provided.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It would not be appropriate for NHS England to provide further comment or clinical opinion on Alex’s case, based on the organisation’s remit and the information provided in your Report.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 9 January 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026