PFD report

Derek Edward Hope THOMAS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Jan 2017•Hampshire (North East)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of protection at the crossing
  2. Obscured visibility at the crossing caused by a fence
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks
  3. Lack of staffing at the crossing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of protection at the crossing

Wider context from the report

“(1) The crossing is unmanned and unprotected ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Obscured visibility at the crossing caused by a fence

Wider context from the report

“(3) Visibility is obscured by a fence although remedial action has been taken to reduce the height of it thereby improving visibility ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of staffing at the crossing

Wider context from the report

“(1) The crossing is unmanned and unprotected ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequacy of direct warning of approaching trains at the crossing

Wider context from the report

“(2) The only direct warning is the horn being sounded by the driver some 400 m from the crossing ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety controls at railway level crossings.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026