PFD report

Anthony David RODÈ · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Jan 2022•Norfolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Unsafe volunteer grass cutting
  2. Failure to maintain dune grass so that Coastwatch volunteers retain visibility along the beach
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to control vegetation that obstructs safety-critical visibility
  3. Failure to establish responsibility for the coastline section
    Part of recurring concern: Unclear accountability for health and safety controls
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Write to and meet shoreline-adjacent organisations and businesses to explain management requirements, permission procedures and collaborative support.

    Stated by Caister-on-Sea Parish Council and Great Yarmouth Borough CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 January 2022.
  2. Action

    Run a social media campaign promoting the shoreline management plan and discouraging independent activity.

    Stated by Caister-on-Sea Parish Council and Great Yarmouth Borough CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 January 2022.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unsafe volunteer grass cutting

Wider context from the report

“1. There is a dispute between Great Yarmouth Borough Council and Caister-On-Sea Parish Council as to who is responsible for the stretch of land where Mr Rodè was strimming the grass. 2. Caister-On-Sea Parish Council state that the bank is part of the sea defences and so is the responsibility of the Great Yarmouth Borough Council. 3. Great Yarmouth Borough Council state the land belongs to the Parish Council and so is their responsibility. 4. As a result, neither organisation has taken responsibility for this section of coastline and the grass on the dunes has grown to such a height as to obscure the view of the Coastwatch volunteers along the beach. 5. Accordingly, the Coastwatch volunteers are unable to properly carry out their role to provide the “eyes and ears” along the coast and to assist in the protection and preservation of life at sea along the coastline. In addition, in this case, it has resulted in a volunteer maker taking the decision to cut the grass himself in circumstances when it was not safe to do so ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain dune grass so that Coastwatch volunteers retain visibility along the beach

Wider context from the report

“1. There is a dispute between Great Yarmouth Borough Council and Caister-On-Sea Parish Council as to who is responsible for the stretch of land where Mr Rodè was strimming the grass. 2. Caister-On-Sea Parish Council state that the bank is part of the sea defences and so is the responsibility of the Great Yarmouth Borough Council. 3. Great Yarmouth Borough Council state the land belongs to the Parish Council and so is their responsibility. 4. As a result, neither organisation has taken responsibility for this section of coastline and the grass on the dunes has grown to such a height as to obscure the view of the Coastwatch volunteers along the beach. 5. Accordingly, the Coastwatch volunteers are unable to properly carry out their role to provide the “eyes and ears” along the coast and to assist in the protection and preservation of life at sea along the coastline. In addition, in this case, it has resulted in a volunteer maker taking the decision to cut the grass himself in circumstances when it was not safe to do so ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to control vegetation that obstructs safety-critical visibility.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to establish responsibility for the coastline section

Wider context from the report

“1. There is a dispute between Great Yarmouth Borough Council and Caister-On-Sea Parish Council as to who is responsible for the stretch of land where Mr Rodè was strimming the grass. 2. Caister-On-Sea Parish Council state that the bank is part of the sea defences and so is the responsibility of the Great Yarmouth Borough Council. 3. Great Yarmouth Borough Council state the land belongs to the Parish Council and so is their responsibility. 4. As a result, neither organisation has taken responsibility for this section of coastline and the grass on the dunes has grown to such a height as to obscure the view of the Coastwatch volunteers along the beach. 5. Accordingly, the Coastwatch volunteers are unable to properly carry out their role to provide the “eyes and ears” along the coast and to assist in the protection and preservation of life at sea along the coastline. In addition, in this case, it has resulted in a volunteer maker taking the decision to cut the grass himself in circumstances when it was not safe to do so ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unclear accountability for health and safety controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write to and meet shoreline-adjacent organisations and businesses to explain management requirements, permission procedures and collaborative support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To help reduce the potential for this to happen in future, Great Yarmouth Borough Council and Caister-on-Sea Parish Council have agreed to take the following steps to increase public awareness of these issues:”

Source location

2022-0021-Response-from-Great-Yarmouth-Borough-Council-and-Caister-On-Sea-Parish-Council_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 26 January 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run a social media campaign promoting the shoreline management plan and discouraging independent activity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To help reduce the potential for this to happen in future, Great Yarmouth Borough Council and Caister-on-Sea Parish Council have agreed to take the following steps to increase public awareness of these issues:”

Source location

2022-0021-Response-from-Great-Yarmouth-Borough-Council-and-Caister-On-Sea-Parish-Council_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 26 January 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Discuss shoreline management with borough parish councils and encourage local publicity through newsletters and similar publications.

    Stated by Caister-on-Sea Parish Council and Great Yarmouth Borough CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 January 2022.
  2. 2

    Continue investigating ownership of the land.

    Stated by Caister-on-Sea Parish Council and Great Yarmouth Borough CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 January 2022.
  3. 3

    Work with Coastal Protection East partners to encourage equivalent shoreline-management awareness measures in their districts.

    Stated by Caister-on-Sea Parish Council and Great Yarmouth Borough CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 January 2022.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Land ownership is not material because coastal protection requirements and the shoreline management plan apply irrespective of ownership.

    Stated by Caister-on-Sea Parish Council and Great Yarmouth Borough CouncilDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss shoreline management with borough parish councils and encourage local publicity through newsletters and similar publications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To help reduce the potential for this to happen in future, Great Yarmouth Borough Council and Caister-on-Sea Parish Council have agreed to take the following steps to increase public awareness of these issues:”

Source location

2022-0021-Response-from-Great-Yarmouth-Borough-Council-and-Caister-On-Sea-Parish-Council_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 26 January 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue investigating ownership of the land.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The borough and parish councils have examined our own records and enquired with the Land Registry, and we have been unable to find any definitive proof of who owns this particular land, and nothing to indicate that it is in the ownership of either council. We would therefore seek to clarify that there is no “dispute” as to ownership of the land. As to responsibility for maintenance, the section below explains the position.”

Source location

2022-0021-Response-from-Great-Yarmouth-Borough-Council-and-Caister-On-Sea-Parish-Council_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 26 January 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with Coastal Protection East partners to encourage equivalent shoreline-management awareness measures in their districts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To help reduce the potential for this to happen in future, Great Yarmouth Borough Council and Caister-on-Sea Parish Council have agreed to take the following steps to increase public awareness of these issues:”

Source location

2022-0021-Response-from-Great-Yarmouth-Borough-Council-and-Caister-On-Sea-Parish-Council_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 26 January 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Land ownership is not material because coastal protection requirements and the shoreline management plan apply irrespective of ownership.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The borough and parish councils have examined our own records and enquired with the Land Registry, and we have been unable to find any definitive proof of who owns this particular land, and nothing to indicate that it is in the ownership of either council. We would therefore seek to clarify that there is no “dispute” as to ownership of the land. As to responsibility for maintenance, the section below explains the position.”

Source location

2022-0021-Response-from-Great-Yarmouth-Borough-Council-and-Caister-On-Sea-Parish-Council_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 26 January 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026