PFD report

Harry Edward Simmons · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Feb 2022•Plymouth, Torbay and South Devon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Sun glare hazard impairing driver visibility at the junction
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate visibility for road users at hazardous junctions
  2. Failure to prevent vehicles cutting the corner onto the incorrect side of the road
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls at high-risk road junctions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Bid for funding to enable construction of the proposed highway safety scheme.

    Stated by Plymouth City CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 February 2022.
  2. Action

    Commission a scheme design addressing the identified highway safety issues.

    Stated by Plymouth City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 February 2022.
  3. Action

    Complete a study into the circumstances leading to the collision.

    Stated by Plymouth City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 February 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Road humps and parking restrictions cannot be predetermined because they require statutory public consultation.

    Stated by Plymouth City CouncilUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Sun glare hazard impairing driver visibility at the junction

Wider context from the report

“(1) Acting Police Inspector ████████ gave evidence to the inquest as follows: 1. In his opinion as Mr Simmons was at least ½ way across the road if the driver had not turned into the junction on the incorrect side of the road, he would have most likely avoided him. 2. The sun is a particular hazard at that junction and would have had an effect on the ability of the driver to see Mr Simmons. 3. Double yellow lines in his opinion would not prevent a further accident of this nature. 4. A pedestrian refuge in the centre of the road on the junction of Montpellier Road and Beacon Park Road together with a keep left sign would prevent vehicles cutting the corner and causing a similar accident again. 5. There have been 3 collisions on this junction in the last 5 years, 2 of which have cited the sun as a contributory factor. 6. There is local knowledge to suggest that drivers cutting this corner is a commonplace occurrence as the sharp turn right to the correct side of the road is a more difficult manoeuvre to make. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate visibility for road users at hazardous junctions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prevent vehicles cutting the corner onto the incorrect side of the road

Wider context from the report

“(1) Acting Police Inspector ████████ gave evidence to the inquest as follows: 1. In his opinion as Mr Simmons was at least ½ way across the road if the driver had not turned into the junction on the incorrect side of the road, he would have most likely avoided him. 2. The sun is a particular hazard at that junction and would have had an effect on the ability of the driver to see Mr Simmons. 3. Double yellow lines in his opinion would not prevent a further accident of this nature. 4. A pedestrian refuge in the centre of the road on the junction of Montpellier Road and Beacon Park Road together with a keep left sign would prevent vehicles cutting the corner and causing a similar accident again. 5. There have been 3 collisions on this junction in the last 5 years, 2 of which have cited the sun as a contributory factor. 6. There is local knowledge to suggest that drivers cutting this corner is a commonplace occurrence as the sharp turn right to the correct side of the road is a more difficult manoeuvre to make. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety controls at high-risk road junctions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Bid for funding to enable construction of the proposed highway safety scheme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The scheme is estimated to cost in the region of £70,000 and I am currently bidding for funding to enable construction to go ahead.”

Source location

Response from Plymouth City Council
Page 1 · response
Published 3 February 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission a scheme design addressing the identified highway safety issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The City Council have undertaken a study into the circumstances leading to the collision and have commissioned a scheme design to deal with the identified highway issues involved.”

Source location

Response from Plymouth City Council
Page 1 · response
Published 3 February 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a study into the circumstances leading to the collision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The City Council have undertaken a study into the circumstances leading to the collision and have commissioned a scheme design to deal with the identified highway issues involved.”

Source location

Response from Plymouth City Council
Page 1 · response
Published 3 February 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Road humps and parking restrictions cannot be predetermined because they require statutory public consultation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“* Introduction of both road humps and waiting restrictions is subject to a statutory consultation process which cannot be predetermined.”

Source location

Response from Plymouth City Council
Page 1 · response
Published 3 February 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Construction depends on securing funding, so the safety scheme cannot proceed unless budget becomes available.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The scheme is estimated to cost in the region of £70,000 and I am currently bidding for funding to enable construction to go ahead.”

Source location

Response from Plymouth City Council
Page 1 · response
Published 3 February 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026