Investigation and inquest
On 17th December 2016 I commenced an investigation into the death of Michelle Barnes. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 23rd October 2016.
The conclusion of the inquest was
1. Michelle deliberately hanged herself but at the time she did so her intention is unclear.
2. On a balance of probabilities (that is to say it is more likely than not) the fact that Michelle Barnes was not on an open ACCT at the time of her death probably contributed more than minimally or trivially to her death.
3. On a balance of probabilities (that is to say it is more likely than not) the decision to terminate visits to University Hospital of North Durham (made on the 15.12.2015) probably contributed more than minimally or trivially to her death.
4. On a balance of probabilities (that is to say it is more likely than not) the lack of further input from the mental health team at HMP Low Newton in the period 02.12.2015 – 16.12.2015 probably contributed more than minimally or trivially to her death.
Circumstances of the death
Michelle was sentenced to two years imprisonment and arrived at HMP Low Newton on 25th June 2015. She was found to be pregnant at a first reception health screening on arrival. An ACCT was opened immediately upon arrival at the prison and this was closed on 23rd July. A second ACCT was opened on 28th September and closed on 30th November 2015. Her baby was born on 11th December 2015, she returned to prison after giving birth on 13th December 2015 and was found dead in her cell on 16th December 2015.
Coroner’s concerns
After the prisoner made a decision to prevent Michelle from further visiting her child in hospital, two officers who did not know Michelle and who Michelle did not know particularly well, were tasked to tell Michelle the news and to further confirm her child was to be taken into care. The senior of those officers, chose not to open an ACCT, notwithstanding she described Michelle as being very upset and crying but instead made an entry in the wing observation book that staff were to “offer support”. It should have been clear to all that Michelle was likely to be upset upon receiving such news. Nothing was documented to indicate or to explain what “support” could or should be offered by staff. There was no clear plan as to what the officer meant by the entry or to what should be delivered. Is there some means of offering support short of an ACCT, was an issue raised by the evidence.