PFD report

Julie Margaret Rose · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Dec 2015•Central and South East Kent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to ensure Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team staff are conversant with the Unable to Make Contact Protocol
  2. Lack of clear mandatory criteria for requesting police welfare checks for patients rated 'Red'
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable welfare-check processes for people whose health is of concernPart of recurring concern: Unreliable welfare-check request handling and follow-up
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team staff are conversant with the Unable to Make Contact Protocol

Wider context from the report

“(1) Although the Trust's 'Unable to Make Contact Protocol' ("the Protocol") has been reviewed since Miss Rose's death, I am concerned that it is insufficiently clear as to when Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team members should request a police welfare check in respect of patients who have been identified as 'Red' for the purposes of the Trust's R A G Rating System. In particular, I am concerned the Protocol does not specifically stipulate circumstances where a request for a welfare check is mandatory (for example, after a certain period of time has elapsed since contact was last made, and / or after a certain number of attempts at contact and / or after attempts at telephone contact and a home visit have both been unsuccessful); (2) In the course of the hearing, I heard evidence that the Protocol has been 'reinforced' across the Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team. Notwithstanding this, a shift co-ordinator who gave evidence was clearly not conversant with the Protocol, raising questions as to the adequacy of the steps taken by the Trust to date in this respect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear mandatory criteria for requesting police welfare checks for patients rated 'Red'

Wider context from the report

“(1) Although the Trust's 'Unable to Make Contact Protocol' ("the Protocol") has been reviewed since Miss Rose's death, I am concerned that it is insufficiently clear as to when Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team members should request a police welfare check in respect of patients who have been identified as 'Red' for the purposes of the Trust's R A G Rating System. In particular, I am concerned the Protocol does not specifically stipulate circumstances where a request for a welfare check is mandatory (for example, after a certain period of time has elapsed since contact was last made, and / or after a certain number of attempts at contact and / or after attempts at telephone contact and a home visit have both been unsuccessful); (2) In the course of the hearing, I heard evidence that the Protocol has been 'reinforced' across the Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team. Notwithstanding this, a shift co-ordinator who gave evidence was clearly not conversant with the Protocol, raising questions as to the adequacy of the steps taken by the Trust to date in this respect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable welfare-check processes for people whose health is of concern; Unreliable welfare-check request handling and follow-up.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.