PFD report

Bradleigh Trevor Barnes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Oct 2022•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
4

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of national guidance for healthcare staff on the use of force in prison
  2. Absence of a local operating policy on the use of force between prison and healthcare services
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe interoperability between prison custody and healthcare procedures
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Implement a memorandum of understanding governing healthcare attendance at, and planned participation in, use-of-force interventions.

    Stated by Oxleas NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 October 2022.
  2. Action

    Write to prison healthcare providers requiring agreed local procedures covering healthcare roles during restraint and monitoring, recording and response to vital signs during and after incidents.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 October 2022.
  3. Action

    Request assurance from regional commissioning directors that the required local procedures have been implemented and evidenced by April 2023.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 October 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    NHS England cannot issue prison use-of-force guidance independently of the operational PSIs, PSOs and Policy Frameworks governing prisons.

    Stated by NHS EnglandUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national guidance for healthcare staff on the use of force in prison

Wider context from the report

“i. There is a lack of national guidance to healthcare staff on the use of force in prison and I request consideration is given by NHS England to providing such national guidance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of a local operating policy on the use of force between prison and healthcare services

Wider context from the report

“ii. There is no local operating policy on the use of force at HMP YOI Portland between the healthcare and the prison and I request that the Governor of HMP YOI Portland and the Chief Executive of Oxleas consider putting a local instruction policy in place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe interoperability between prison custody and healthcare procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a memorandum of understanding governing healthcare attendance at, and planned participation in, use-of-force interventions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have now put in place a memorandum of understanding between healthcare and the prison regarding attendance of healthcare and all planned use of force interventions in accordance with the HM Prison Service, Prison Service Order: Order Number 1600 – Use of Force (see attached)”

Source location

Response from NHS Oxleas
Page 1 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write to prison healthcare providers requiring agreed local procedures covering healthcare roles during restraint and monitoring, recording and response to vital signs during and after incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst the guidance and PSA referred to above were already in place around the time of Bradleigh’s death, NHS England recognises there is learning to be taken from the sad events in this case, and will be writing to all prison healthcare providers, via our seven regional commissioning teams, requiring them to work with their prison governor and have an agreed local operating procedure in place that includes:”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request assurance from regional commissioning directors that the required local procedures have been implemented and evidenced by April 2023.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England’s central team will request assurance from our regional Directors of Commissioning that the above actions have been implemented and evidenced by April 2023. We are happy to provide you with a further update at this time if you consider this would assist?”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with HMPPS on the planned revision of PSO 1600, providing clinical leadership to enhance its healthcare roles and responsibilities section.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the above, NHS England will be working with colleagues in the HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) to assist with their planned review and revision of PSO 1600: Use of Force. We will be supporting this review through providing clinical leadership on the revision and enhancement of section 6 and the roles and responsibilities of healthcare.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and update the national use-of-force policy with healthcare colleagues engaged in the process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am aware that NHS England are providing a separate response relating to issuing national Use of Force guidance for healthcare staff so I will not comment on this further but I wish to assure you that we continue striving to improve joined up working between prison and healthcare staff. The national use of force policy is currently being reviewed and updated, and healthcare colleagues are engaged as part of this process. I fully appreciate the important role that healthcare play in ensuring the safety of all prisoners and staff.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service (1)
Page 1 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce a memorandum of understanding defining healthcare roles during planned and unplanned use-of-force incidents and required post-incident actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following evidence heard at the inquest you have raised a concern that there was no local operating policy on the use of force between the prison and the healthcare provider. There is a new healthcare provider at the prison, Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust – Offender Healthcare Services. When healthcare providers are commissioned, part of the contract refers to the fact that they must adopt HMPPS policies and be guided by them. The contract began on 1 December 2022 and a memorandum of understanding (MOU) has been produced by the Governor of HMP Portland and the Service Director of Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, setting out the role of healthcare during planned and unplanned use of force incidents as well as post incident actions to be followed to ensure the wellbeing of prisoners and staff.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service (1)
Page 1 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England cannot issue prison use-of-force guidance independently of the operational PSIs, PSOs and Policy Frameworks governing prisons.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Firstly, I would like to clarify that the Prison Service Instructions (PSIs), Prison Service Orders (PSOs) and Policy Frameworks set out the framework for the operational running of a prison. NHS England and prison healthcare providers are required to ensure that all prison healthcare policies and service delivery are aligned to the appropriate PSI, PSO or policy framework. NHS England cannot deliver guidance that is not cognisant with these documents. In this case, as you have highlighted, PSO 1600 Use of Force is the operational instruction that includes the use of manual restraint, and section 6 outlines the roles of healthcare in the planned and unplanned use of force.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing policies and the local memorandum of understanding address healthcare roles during planned and unplanned use of force incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following evidence heard at the inquest you have raised a concern that there was no local operating policy on the use of force between the prison and the healthcare provider. There is a new healthcare provider at the prison, Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust – Offender Healthcare Services. When healthcare providers are commissioned, part of the contract refers to the fact that they must adopt HMPPS policies and be guided by them. The contract began on 1 December 2022 and a memorandum of understanding (MOU) has been produced by the Governor of HMP Portland and the Service Director of Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, setting out the role of healthcare during planned and unplanned use of force incidents as well as post incident actions to be followed to ensure the wellbeing of prisoners and staff.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service (1)
Page 1 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England is responsible for responding to national Use of Force guidance for healthcare staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am aware that NHS England are providing a separate response relating to issuing national Use of Force guidance for healthcare staff so I will not comment on this further but I wish to assure you that we continue striving to improve joined up working between prison and healthcare staff. The national use of force policy is currently being reviewed and updated, and healthcare colleagues are engaged as part of this process. I fully appreciate the important role that healthcare play in ensuring the safety of all prisoners and staff.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service (1)
Page 1 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Provide joint training for healthcare staff and prison officers on use-of-force techniques and associated medical risks.

    Stated by Oxleas NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 October 2022.
  2. 2

    Replace metal bedframes at HMP Portland with new whitewood furniture beds.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 October 2022.
  3. 3

    Complete a review of fire-safety requirements for furniture, mattresses and bedding in prison establishments.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 October 2022.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    Current mattresses meet stringent fire-retardancy standards, with safety requirements explaining their hardness and limiting the case for alternatives.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  2. 2

    Local monitoring, challenge and removal of additional mattresses address the risk of mattresses being used as barricades.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide joint training for healthcare staff and prison officers on use-of-force techniques and associated medical risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, we have also agreed Healthcare staff are to be trained alongside prison officers in order to fully understand the techniques used and associated medical risks.”

Source location

Response from NHS Oxleas
Page 1 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replace metal bedframes at HMP Portland with new whitewood furniture beds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that the metal bedframes at HMP Portland have been replaced by new whitewood furniture beds and am assured that the feedback received from the prison is that there has been a positive response to the new beds from prisoners.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service (1)
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a review of fire-safety requirements for furniture, mattresses and bedding in prison establishments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that a review of Prison Service Instruction (PSI 11/2015) Fire Safety in Prison Establishments was carried out in March 2022. The policy sets out the fire retardancy standards for furniture and upholstery in prisons which are assessed as being a very high hazard for fires. For reference, hospitals are classed as medium hazard and hotels and residential homes for the elderly as high hazard. For this reason there are very stringent regulations that HMPPS are required to comply with when considering the beds, mattresses, and bedding to provide to prisoners to ensure the safety of prisoners and staff.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service (1)
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Current mattresses meet stringent fire-retardancy standards, with safety requirements explaining their hardness and limiting the case for alternatives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that a review of Prison Service Instruction (PSI 11/2015) Fire Safety in Prison Establishments was carried out in March 2022. The policy sets out the fire retardancy standards for furniture and upholstery in prisons which are assessed as being a very high hazard for fires. For reference, hospitals are classed as medium hazard and hotels and residential homes for the elderly as high hazard. For this reason there are very stringent regulations that HMPPS are required to comply with when considering the beds, mattresses, and bedding to provide to prisoners to ensure the safety of prisoners and staff.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service (1)
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local monitoring, challenge and removal of additional mattresses address the risk of mattresses being used as barricades.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to reduce the risk of mattresses being used as a barricade, prisons must manage this locally in the same way that they monitor the potential use of other cell furniture as a barricade, and staff must challenge prisoners who have additional mattresses and remove them. This is monitored through daily accommodation fabric checks which are recorded and assured locally to ensure safety and security.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service (1)
Page 2 · response
Published 25 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
4/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026