PFD report

Jacqueline Françoise VALVONA · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Dec 2018•Isle of Wight

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a safe pedestrian crossing on the A3054 at the Sloop Inn
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risksPart of recurring concern: Unsafe bus stop siting and pedestrian access
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Instruct Island Roads to undertake feasibility study and design work for a controlled pedestrian crossing at the location.

    Stated by Isle of Wight CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 May 2019.
  2. Action

    Complete a site review against guidance to assess the suitability of installing a controlled pedestrian crossing.

    Stated by Isle of Wight CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 May 2019.
  3. Action

    Review the crossing site and assess its suitability for a controlled pedestrian facility using collision data and Local Transport Note 1/95 guidance.

    Stated by Ringway Island RoadsStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 May 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Current evidence does not indicate that the site meets the criteria for a pedestrian-controlled crossing, although seasonal variation will be assessed.

    Stated by Isle of Wight CouncilDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a safe pedestrian crossing on the A3054 at the Sloop Inn

Wider context from the report

“1. I have concerns about the lack of a safe place for pedestrians to cross the A3054 at that point. There are a great many elderly people who visit the Sloop Inn due to the affordability of the roast meals there, and I heard evidence that there are over 40 elderly people living in Homebray House which is a short distance up the steep hill that is Wootton High Street many of whom enjoy visiting this pub/restaurant. 2. The A3054 is a busy single-lane carriageway road with one lane in each direction taking much traffic from the ferry terminal at Fishbourne to Newport, the County town, and beyond. It is the main link between Newport in the west and Ryde on the east of the island and this stretch of road is predominantly residential in nature. Whilst there is a crossing higher up the hill on Wootton High Road, if pedestrians have mobility issues – as Mrs VALVONA did - they are unable to walk up the steep 4° hill incline to reach the crossing. 3. There have been 7 slight injury accident in the vicinity in the 5 years leading up to 31.12.2017, and I heard evidence that there is a local pressure group which has been campaigning for a crossing of some sort to be installed to make this popular site for traversing the road to be safer. I also heard that there have been a large number of near-miss incidents which don’t feature in the statistics. There is an increased tendency for pedestrians to want to cross the road at this point as there is a bus-stop opposite the Sloop Inn which stops further up the hill, in the middle of Wootton High Street, and thereby means that those with mobility issues don’t have to negotiate the hill on foot. 4. Whilst the road is almost too narrow at that point to accommodate the inclusion of a traffic island (bearing in mind the number of HGVs that traverse that stretch of road), Senior Investigating Officer Police ████████ said in evidence that he would support the proposition that either a pelican or zebra crossing be installed at this point to prevent future deaths as it would mean that the traffic has to stop to allow pedestrians to get across safely. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks; Unsafe bus stop siting and pedestrian access.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Instruct Island Roads to undertake feasibility study and design work for a controlled pedestrian crossing at the location.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Isle of Wight Council instructed Island Roads to undertake a feasibility study and design for a pedestrian controlled crossing at this location. The process established that due to road alignment, nearby junctions and bus lay-by that the only location where a crossing could be accommodated is between the two bus stops. During the feasibility design stage Island Roads observed the area to assess the level of demand for a new pedestrian crossing, and found that pedestrian numbers were well below that where a crossing would be considered. However, the process also identified that most pedestrians crossed close to the Lakeside Hotel access road, and therefore it is probable that the proposed crossing point is unlikely to be used by able bodied persons.”

Source location

2018-0391-Response-by-Isle-of-Wight-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 13 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a site review against guidance to assess the suitability of installing a controlled pedestrian crossing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following receipt of your report, a review of the site and the suitability of installing a controlled crossing facility was undertaken by Island Roads on behalf of the Council. The site has therefore been reviewed using the guidance contained within Local Transport Note 1/95.”

Source location

2018-0391-Response-by-Isle-of-Wight-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 13 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the crossing site and assess its suitability for a controlled pedestrian facility using collision data and Local Transport Note 1/95 guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Ringway Island Roads as Highway Service Provider has reviewed the contents of the Regulation 28 Notice received from the Coroner during late December 2018, in which concerns were expressed in regard to the lack of safe places to cross the A3054 at the place that the collision occurred.”

Source location

2018-0391-Response-by-Island-Roads
Page 1 · response
Published 13 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and cost a feasibility design and concept layout for a controlled pedestrian crossing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Island Roads have been instructed by the Isle of Wight Council to undertake a feasibility design for a controlled crossing and a concept layout has been drawn up and costed.”

Source location

2018-0391-Response-by-Island-Roads
Page 2 · response
Published 13 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a further assessment of controlled-crossing suitability and potential funding after receiving the summer peak-flow data.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On receipt of the summer month peak flow data, a further assessment will be undertaken such that the suitability of a new controlled crossing and the potential for funding can be finalised.”

Source location

2018-0391-Response-by-Island-Roads
Page 3 · response
Published 13 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake a further summer pedestrian survey to measure vehicle and pedestrian numbers during the peak tourist season.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As each of the main trip generators in the area are likely to experience a significant seasonal variation, a further pedestrian survey will be undertaken in the summer months to determine the vehicle and pedestrian numbers during the peak tourist season.”

Source location

2018-0391-Response-by-Island-Roads
Page 3 · response
Published 13 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a pedestrian survey to measure crossing demand and difficulty during peak periods.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The assessment also involved undertaking a pedestrian survey to determine the demand, and difficulty crossing during peak periods.”

Source location

2018-0391-Response-by-Island-Roads
Page 2 · response
Published 13 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Current evidence does not indicate that the site meets the criteria for a pedestrian-controlled crossing, although seasonal variation will be assessed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At the current time the evidence held by the Council does not indicate that the site meets the criteria to consider a pedestrian controlled crossing but I am aware that the area is likely to experience seasonal variation. Therefore the Council would propose that Island Roads undertakes a further assessment in the summer to determine whether the vehicle and pedestrian numbers indicate that the site should be considered for a new crossing.”

Source location

2018-0391-Response-by-Isle-of-Wight-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 13 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The location is not presently justified for a controlled crossing because pedestrian demand is low, alternative facilities exist, and crossings are generally safe.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The distance between Station Road and Firestone Copse Road is 1km. In this length of road there are three controlled pedestrian facilities and two pedestrian refuges. The”

Source location

2018-0391-Response-by-Island-Roads
Page 1 · response
Published 13 May 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026