PFD report

Layla Stephanie Dobson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Dec 2019•West Yorkshire Eastern

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of a formalised process guiding practitioners on the appropriate route of support
  2. Failure to flag or reference current self-harm or suicide information to relevant decision-makers
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably report self-harm and suicide risks to people able to help
  3. Failure of the mental service access process to ensure systematic consideration of each support pathway
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Develop guidance for referral meetings to assess suicide risk, existing support and self-referral status, recommend crisis-support steps, and record its consideration.

    Stated by Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 December 2019.
  2. Action

    Develop an automatically issued standard receipt letter for self-referrals outlining relevant crisis support services.

    Stated by Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 December 2019.
  3. Action

    Update the service referral form and information leaflet with details of relevant crisis support services in Leeds.

    Stated by Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 December 2019.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a formalised process guiding practitioners on the appropriate route of support

Wider context from the report

“Although the PDCN considered Layla's referral, notwithstanding it does not take self-referrals to its care coordination services, the evidence provided at the inquest indicated that there was no formalised or tangible process to guide or otherwise inform practitioners as to which route of support would be appropriate for an individual. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to flag or reference current self-harm or suicide information to relevant decision-makers

Wider context from the report

“Whilst the approach to the CMHT was decided upon and actioned, my view upon the evidence was that the area on the form relating to current self-harm/suicide is not further flagged or referenced to those taking relevant decisions and this could strengthen the scrutiny of information when deciding upon which service may be contacted. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably report self-harm and suicide risks to people able to help.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the mental service access process to ensure systematic consideration of each support pathway

Wider context from the report

“Whilst the evidence at the inquest was clear that Layla was under the care of her GP who later assessed her mental health/risk on 8th March 2018, I am of the view that the process whereby an individual seeks to request/access mental services could be strengthened by guidance or referencing such that each pathway of support is systematically considered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop guidance for referral meetings to assess suicide risk, existing support and self-referral status, recommend crisis-support steps, and record its consideration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Personality Disorder Clinical Network service has carefully considered the matters of concerns outlined and agreed an action plan (appendix 1) at the service Clinical Governance forum held on the 30th January 2020. Firstly the service is developing guidance to further inform the decision making process with regards to referral to relevant crisis support services. The guidance will include for example:”

Source location

2019-0425-Response-from-Leeds-and-York-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop an automatically issued standard receipt letter for self-referrals outlining relevant crisis support services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The service will additionally change its process for responding to self-referrals by developing a standard referral receipt letter which will automatically be emailed and/or posted to service users outlining relevant crisis support services. This measure is intended to additionally ensure that service users referred to the service will always be made aware of the relevant services in the City who may be able to provide a crisis service level of response, pending the referral outcome.”

Source location

2019-0425-Response-from-Leeds-and-York-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the service referral form and information leaflet with details of relevant crisis support services in Leeds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The service is also aware that there may be instances where the referral may not be considered by the referral team for up to 7 days or where direct contact with the service user was considered the most appropriate course of action and they ‘did not attend’. As such the service referral form and information leaflet (available via the LYPFT website) will be updated to provide details of relevant crisis support services in Leeds.”

Source location

2019-0425-Response-from-Leeds-and-York-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 December 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026