PFD report

Marina Lorraine Waldron · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 May 2025•Gwent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
22

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to heed concerns about inadequate eating or drinking
  2. Delays in considering dietary advice and parenteral feeding
  3. Failure to respond to low albumin indicating malnutrition
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate management of malnutrition risk
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.11

  1. Action

    Incorporate escalation-review learning into multidisciplinary patient-safety and quality forums.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  2. Action

    Promote the Call for Concern protocol so families can escalate concerns directly.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  3. Action

    Reinforce red trays and visual identifiers for patients requiring dietary monitoring.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to heed concerns about inadequate eating or drinking

Wider context from the report

“During the 8 ½ weeks of MW’s hospital admission, her nutritional needs were poorly considered or managed. Examples of this include: 1. An ongoing failure to heed the family’s concerns that from admission to hospital, MW was not eating or drinking adequately 2. A failure to formally monitor MW’s dietary intake 3. A failure to respond to a low Albumin level which is a sign of malnutrition 4. Dietary advice and parenteral feeding were not properly considered until 29/1/2024 (6 weeks after admission) The medical staff who gave evidence agreed that malnutrition contributed to MW’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in considering dietary advice and parenteral feeding

Wider context from the report

“During the 8 ½ weeks of MW’s hospital admission, her nutritional needs were poorly considered or managed. Examples of this include: 1. An ongoing failure to heed the family’s concerns that from admission to hospital, MW was not eating or drinking adequately 2. A failure to formally monitor MW’s dietary intake 3. A failure to respond to a low Albumin level which is a sign of malnutrition 4. Dietary advice and parenteral feeding were not properly considered until 29/1/2024 (6 weeks after admission) The medical staff who gave evidence agreed that malnutrition contributed to MW’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to respond to low albumin indicating malnutrition

Wider context from the report

“During the 8 ½ weeks of MW’s hospital admission, her nutritional needs were poorly considered or managed. Examples of this include: 1. An ongoing failure to heed the family’s concerns that from admission to hospital, MW was not eating or drinking adequately 2. A failure to formally monitor MW’s dietary intake 3. A failure to respond to a low Albumin level which is a sign of malnutrition 4. Dietary advice and parenteral feeding were not properly considered until 29/1/2024 (6 weeks after admission) The medical staff who gave evidence agreed that malnutrition contributed to MW’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate management of malnutrition risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to formally monitor dietary intake

Wider context from the report

“During the 8 ½ weeks of MW’s hospital admission, her nutritional needs were poorly considered or managed. Examples of this include: 1. An ongoing failure to heed the family’s concerns that from admission to hospital, MW was not eating or drinking adequately 2. A failure to formally monitor MW’s dietary intake 3. A failure to respond to a low Albumin level which is a sign of malnutrition 4. Dietary advice and parenteral feeding were not properly considered until 29/1/2024 (6 weeks after admission) The medical staff who gave evidence agreed that malnutrition contributed to MW’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate management of patients' nutrition and hydration needs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate escalation-review learning into multidisciplinary patient-safety and quality forums.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Initiating a thematic review of delayed escalations related to nutritional concerns.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Promote the Call for Concern protocol so families can escalate concerns directly.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We acknowledge the family's repeated concerns and regret that these were not adequately responded to. To address this, the Health Board has implemented or will implement actions under Recommendation 1 of the attached plan, including:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reinforce red trays and visual identifiers for patients requiring dietary monitoring.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To improve compliance and accuracy in monitoring nutritional intake, Recommendation 2 of the action plan focuses on:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use AMaT data to assess and improve ward-level compliance with food-chart use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To improve compliance and accuracy in monitoring nutritional intake, Recommendation 2 of the action plan focuses on:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and deploy a Gold Standard food chart with a supporting staff briefing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To improve compliance and accuracy in monitoring nutritional intake, Recommendation 2 of the action plan focuses on:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Embed strengthened nutrition documentation and compliance monitoring within the Quality Management System.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The introduction of this governance framework has already supported the implementation of key improvement actions at pace, including enhanced monitoring of fluid balance, improved escalation protocols for malnutrition risk, and strengthened documentation and compliance monitoring. These initiatives are being embedded within our Quality Management System and have enabled a more responsive and accountable approach to preventing avoidable harm.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Embed improved escalation protocols for malnutrition risk within the Quality Management System.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The introduction of this governance framework has already supported the implementation of key improvement actions at pace, including enhanced monitoring of fluid balance, improved escalation protocols for malnutrition risk, and strengthened documentation and compliance monitoring. These initiatives are being embedded within our Quality Management System and have enabled a more responsive and accountable approach to preventing avoidable harm.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a thematic review of delayed escalations involving nutritional concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Under Recommendation 3, we are strengthening escalation frameworks to support timely clinical decision-making. Key actions include:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve recording of patient capacity and preferences in feeding decisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Concern 4: Delayed dietary advice and parenteral feeding consideration”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review SBAR and transfer documentation to add nutrition-specific prompts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The need for earlier specialist involvement and clear documentation around nutritional care is being addressed through Recommendation 4, including:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore environmental barriers to dietary monitoring, including early tray clearance and single-room isolation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To improve compliance and accuracy in monitoring nutritional intake, Recommendation 2 of the action plan focuses on:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.11

  1. 1

    Present Nutrition and Hydration quality-improvement initiatives at key governance forums.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  2. 2

    Reassess patient transport and discharge processes to ensure nutritional needs are considered.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  3. 3

    Include Llais in the Nutrition and Hydration strategic group.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  4. 4

    Pilot AIDET and difficult-conversations communication training.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  5. 5

    Embed enhanced fluid-balance monitoring within the Quality Management System.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  6. 6

    Integrate progress updates into Quality Safety Learning and Improvement structures.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  7. 7

    Maintain governance through ward accreditation, risk-register integration and quality reporting.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  8. 8

    Introduce ward-level reflection sessions using anonymised case studies to address communication challenges.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  9. 9

    Deliver Nutrition and Hydration-focused divisional learning days.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  10. 10

    Establish a dedicated nutrition and hydration governance structure with strategic and operational groups.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  11. 11

    Disseminate the Clinical Escalation Framework across clinical divisions.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 22 May 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present Nutrition and Hydration quality-improvement initiatives at key governance forums.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To embed sustained improvement and shared learning across the organisation, Recommendation 5 focuses on:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reassess patient transport and discharge processes to ensure nutritional needs are considered.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The need for earlier specialist involvement and clear documentation around nutritional care is being addressed through Recommendation 4, including:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include Llais in the Nutrition and Hydration strategic group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Strategic Nutrition and Hydration Group provides senior leadership and organisational accountability. It is chaired by the Assistant Director for Allied Health Professions and Health Science, with Deputy Director-level representation from Nursing and Medicine. Membership includes colleagues from finance, digital, quality and patient safety, with Llais invited to participate to ensure the voice of service users is reflected. The group meets every two months and has standing agenda items including review of incident trends, risk register monitoring, and oversight of strategic improvement programmes. It also acts as an expert advisory group to the wider organisation on matters relating to nutrition and hydration safety.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pilot AIDET and difficult-conversations communication training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We acknowledge the family's repeated concerns and regret that these were not adequately responded to. To address this, the Health Board has implemented or will implement actions under Recommendation 1 of the attached plan, including:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Embed enhanced fluid-balance monitoring within the Quality Management System.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The introduction of this governance framework has already supported the implementation of key improvement actions at pace, including enhanced monitoring of fluid balance, improved escalation protocols for malnutrition risk, and strengthened documentation and compliance monitoring. These initiatives are being embedded within our Quality Management System and have enabled a more responsive and accountable approach to preventing avoidable harm.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Integrate progress updates into Quality Safety Learning and Improvement structures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To embed sustained improvement and shared learning across the organisation, Recommendation 5 focuses on:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain governance through ward accreditation, risk-register integration and quality reporting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This action plan has been jointly developed by senior nursing, medical and allied health professions leadership with oversight from the Executive Director of Allied Health Professions (AHP) & Health Science and Executive Director of Nursing. A full governance route is in place, including the Nutrition & Hydration strategic group, Clinical Nutrition & Hydration sub-group, Ward Accreditation processes, and integration into the Health Board’s risk register and quality reporting structures.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce ward-level reflection sessions using anonymised case studies to address communication challenges.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We acknowledge the family's repeated concerns and regret that these were not adequately responded to. To address this, the Health Board has implemented or will implement actions under Recommendation 1 of the attached plan, including:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver Nutrition and Hydration-focused divisional learning days.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To embed sustained improvement and shared learning across the organisation, Recommendation 5 focuses on:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a dedicated nutrition and hydration governance structure with strategic and operational groups.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Thank you for your letter and accompanying report, which the Health Board received on 22 May 2025. I am writing to provide you with the Health Board’s response to the Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, following the inquest into the death of Marina Lorraine Waldron. To provide assurance to the Coroner that sustained improvements are being embedded across our organisation, we have established a dedicated governance structure focused on nutrition and hydration.”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the Clinical Escalation Framework across clinical divisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Under Recommendation 3, we are strengthening escalation frameworks to support timely clinical decision-making. Key actions include:”

Source location

Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026