PFD report

Joyce Carney · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Apr 2016•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of agreed police-hospital protocols for joint risk assessments and liaison
  2. Failure of police-hospital liaison and communication during risk assessment of police-supervised hospital patients
  3. Failure of risk assessments for police-supervised hospital patients to protect other patients, visitors, members of the public and staff
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable police-hospital exchange of risk information during mental-health patient supervision
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Request that the National Policing Lead raise with chief constables whether hospital detention procedures and risk assessments are in place.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 April 2016.
  2. Action

    Raise with police and NHS organisations the need for local relationships and precautions to manage risks safely in health settings.

    Stated by Home OfficeStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 April 2016.
  3. Action

    Develop and finalise a joint Patient Under Escort Record with GMP, incorporating shared risk assessment and patient management information for escorted patients.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 April 2016.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Responsibility for arrest, detention and supervision of hospital patients rests operationally with each police force’s chief officer.

    Stated by Home OfficeRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of agreed police-hospital protocols for joint risk assessments and liaison

Wider context from the report

“iv. There are no agreed protocols, policies or procedures between the Greater Manchester Police and the Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan in relation to joint risk assessments for patients detained at the Hospital under arrest or in the presence of or supervised by Police Officers. Furthermore there is no protocol, in relation to liaison and consultation between the Greater Manchester Police and the Hospital to formulate risk assessments in relation to patients detained at the Hospital under arrest or in the presence of or supervised by Police Officers. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of police-hospital liaison and communication during risk assessment of police-supervised hospital patients

Wider context from the report

“i. When the Patient was moved to Lowton Ward in the Hospital the risk assessment conducted by the Hospital in relation to the location of the Patient in the Ward involved the Bed Manager, the Ward Manager and the Nurses treating the Patient. The risk assessment did not involve, nor include, the Police Officers who were observing a patient. The risk assessment conducted by the Hospital focussed on the safety of the Patient and did not extend to the safety of other patients in the Hospital, visitors to the Hospital, members of the public and members of staff employed in the Hospital. ii. The risk assessment conducted by Police Officers, in relation to the Patient at the Hospital, focussed on the Patient and the fact that the Patient may seek to leave the Hospital but the assessment did not include any discussions or liaison with Hospital staff. The risk assessment did not include the protection of other patients in the Hospital, visitors to the Hospital, members of the public or staff employed in the Hospital. iii. There was no liaison or communication between the Police Officers observing the Patient and the Hospital treating the Patient in relation to the layout of the Hospital or with regard to the safety of other patients in the Hospital, visitors to the Hospital, members of the public and staff employed in the Hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of risk assessments for police-supervised hospital patients to protect other patients, visitors, members of the public and staff

Wider context from the report

“i. When the Patient was moved to Lowton Ward in the Hospital the risk assessment conducted by the Hospital in relation to the location of the Patient in the Ward involved the Bed Manager, the Ward Manager and the Nurses treating the Patient. The risk assessment did not involve, nor include, the Police Officers who were observing a patient. The risk assessment conducted by the Hospital focussed on the safety of the Patient and did not extend to the safety of other patients in the Hospital, visitors to the Hospital, members of the public and members of staff employed in the Hospital. ii. The risk assessment conducted by Police Officers, in relation to the Patient at the Hospital, focussed on the Patient and the fact that the Patient may seek to leave the Hospital but the assessment did not include any discussions or liaison with Hospital staff. The risk assessment did not include the protection of other patients in the Hospital, visitors to the Hospital, members of the public or staff employed in the Hospital. iii. There was no liaison or communication between the Police Officers observing the Patient and the Hospital treating the Patient in relation to the layout of the Hospital or with regard to the safety of other patients in the Hospital, visitors to the Hospital, members of the public and staff employed in the Hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable police-hospital exchange of risk information during mental-health patient supervision.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of senior police officers to reassess risk after concerns about an agitated patient threatening to leave hospital

Wider context from the report

“Furthermore the Officers at the Hospital raised concerns with their Supervising Officer, namely a Sergeant at the Police Station, in relation to the Patient being agitated and threatening to leave the Hospital during the afternoon of the 21st December 2014 but neither the Sargent nor any other senior Officer attended the Hospital to conduct any further risk assessment or to reassess the situation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request that the National Policing Lead raise with chief constables whether hospital detention procedures and risk assessments are in place.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is important that the police adhere to Authorised Professional Practice in these circumstances to avoid these sorts of tragedies. It is for this reason that I have asked the Minister for Policing, Fire, Criminal Justice and Victims to write to the National Policing Lead for Custody, Chief Constable ████████, to raise this matter with Chief Constables across England and Wales. They must be able to satisfy themselves that the relevant procedures, including risk assessments, are in place.”

Source location

2016-0140-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Raise with police and NHS organisations the need for local relationships and precautions to manage risks safely in health settings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Police officers regularly attend health settings, for a variety of purposes, and you raise the important issue of how they work with NHS organisations to manage any risks in those settings safely. I agree with you that it is important for those agencies to come together to make sure that the right relationships and precautions are in place in their locality. This case highlights the importance of that joint working, and the Minister will also be raising this.”

Source location

2016-0140-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and finalise a joint Patient Under Escort Record with GMP, incorporating shared risk assessment and patient management information for escorted patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the conclusion of Mrs Carney’s inquest, ████████ contacted ████████ (Detective Inspector) of GMP and it was agreed that both organisations would work jointly to address the actions outlined at points 1–3 above. The Trust already has a very good relationship with GMP and this would be utilised to formulate the required protocols, policies and procedures for the protection of patients, staff and visitors to the hospital.”

Source location

2016-0140-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust_Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 7 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out training on using the Patient Under Escort Record to staff in A&E and assessment areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The “Patient Under Escort Record” will be completed by the police officer when they attend the hospital site with the patient. The document will then be completed jointly by GMP and hospital staff throughout the course of the patient’s stay, and will remain with them until discharge. Upon discharge the document will become the property of GMP who will hold it on file to form part of their intelligence of that patient (should it be required in the future).”

Source location

2016-0140-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust_Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 7 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for arrest, detention and supervision of hospital patients rests operationally with each police force’s chief officer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The arrest, detention and supervision of individuals by police whilst they are patients in hospital is an operational consideration for the chief officer of each police force. In carrying out their duties, the police should follow the College of Policing Authorised Professional Practice (APP) - Detention and Custody, which covers risk assessments when a person is detained in non-police custody settings, including hospitals. The College have also produced dedicated APP on risk, which focuses on planning for, and anticipating, risk in a variety of operational contexts.”

Source location

2016-0140-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Share the coroner’s report with NHS Protect.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 April 2016.
  2. 2

    Audit use of the Patient Under Escort Record three months after implementation and make the results available.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 April 2016.
  3. 3

    Continue working with GMP to protect patients, staff and visitors when patients attend hospital under police escort or supervision.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 April 2016.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The Trust’s actions cover only its hospitals; GMP is expected to work with other Greater Manchester hospital authorities.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the coroner’s report with NHS Protect.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although frontline organisations must have a measure of autonomy in operational matters, your report raises some important points about the way in which the police and hospitals can work together in these instances. To this end, I have shared your report with NHS Protect, which is the organisation with responsibility for a wide range of security and protection issues across the NHS.”

Source location

2016-0140-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit use of the Patient Under Escort Record three months after implementation and make the results available.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The “Patient Under Escort Record” will be completed by the police officer when they attend the hospital site with the patient. The document will then be completed jointly by GMP and hospital staff throughout the course of the patient’s stay, and will remain with them until discharge. Upon discharge the document will become the property of GMP who will hold it on file to form part of their intelligence of that patient (should it be required in the future).”

Source location

2016-0140-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust_Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 7 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with GMP to protect patients, staff and visitors when patients attend hospital under police escort or supervision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the conclusion of Mrs Carney’s inquest, ████████ contacted ████████ (Detective Inspector) of GMP and it was agreed that both organisations would work jointly to address the actions outlined at points 1–3 above. The Trust already has a very good relationship with GMP and this would be utilised to formulate the required protocols, policies and procedures for the protection of patients, staff and visitors to the hospital.”

Source location

2016-0140-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust_Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 7 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust’s actions cover only its hospitals; GMP is expected to work with other Greater Manchester hospital authorities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The following actions have been undertaken in relation to hospitals only under the management of the Trust. It is our understanding that GMP will also be working with other Hospital Authorities within the Greater Manchester area.”

Source location

2016-0140-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust_Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 7 April 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026