PFD report

Jane Diane Livingston · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Oct 2019•Swansea and Neath Port Talbot

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to provide gateway assessors with full access to relevant review and concern notes
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable Gateway referral and assessment process
  2. Failure to make patients’ treatment wishes and concerns available for gateway assessment
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide gateway assessors with full access to relevant review and concern notes

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the inquest it was apparent that the deceased’s wishes for hospital treatment and the reasons behind the same were not available to the gateway assessors on the 14th of December 2018. In this case the deceased underwent further assessments therefore the effects of this situation were reduced. I am concerned however that in other cases this could result in situations where a patient’s own concerns are not addressed or taken into consideration when conducting an assessment that could lead to an assessment based on incomplete information and result in another patient taking their own life. 1. The gateway assessors did not have full access to the notes relating to the review and subsequent concerns that triggered the gateway assessment. This may result in the assessors not obtaining the full picture when assessing a patient and making a treatment plan based on incomplete information. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable Gateway referral and assessment process.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make patients’ treatment wishes and concerns available for gateway assessment

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the inquest it was apparent that the deceased’s wishes for hospital treatment and the reasons behind the same were not available to the gateway assessors on the 14th of December 2018. In this case the deceased underwent further assessments therefore the effects of this situation were reduced. I am concerned however that in other cases this could result in situations where a patient’s own concerns are not addressed or taken into consideration when conducting an assessment that could lead to an assessment based on incomplete information and result in another patient taking their own life. 1. The gateway assessors did not have full access to the notes relating to the review and subsequent concerns that triggered the gateway assessment. This may result in the assessors not obtaining the full picture when assessing a patient and making a treatment plan based on incomplete information. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.