PFD report

Mr. Masoud Ghaderi · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Jul 2015•Avon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Ward-round planning and preparation relying solely on a brief nursing summary
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff
  2. Lack of overarching responsibility for reviewing risk assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Unclear accountability for safety risk assessments
  3. Inconsistent recording of engagement with service users
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Review nursing models of care and generate recommendations for a standardised care-delivery model.

    Stated by Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 July 2015.
  2. Action

    Commission an audit of risk-assessment reviews across inpatient units.

    Stated by Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 July 2015.
  3. Action

    Roll out local training on implementing the Engagement and Observation Policy across all Bristol wards.

    Stated by Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 July 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    The Engagement and Observation Policy already clearly defines engagement, observation and recording requirements, so policy revision is not indicated.

    Stated by Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ward-round planning and preparation relying solely on a brief nursing summary

Wider context from the report

“(3) The Trust has a comprehensive single care record for each service user. However, the ward rounds rely only on a brief summary prepared by a nurse the night before when that nurse may not have made any entries in the care record nor would be present at the ward rounds. The Trust should review its planning and preparation for ward rounds so that reliance is not placed solely on a brief summary with the inherent risk of errors and omissions . ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of overarching responsibility for reviewing risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“(2) There was no one member of staff with overarching responsibility for reviewing any risk assessments. Therefore any trends in changing risk, e.g. increasing risk of self-harm or suicide, could not be identified. The Trust should consider designating a member of staff with this responsibility in the same manner as it has one member of staff with responsibility for ensuring the care plan(s) are reviewed and maintained up-to-date. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unclear accountability for safety risk assessments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inconsistent recording of engagement with service users

Wider context from the report

“(1) There was inconsistence records of engagement with service users. The Engagement and Observation policy of the Trust should be reviewed to consider how the policy operates and how engagements with service users are to be recorded in a consistent manner with appropriate staff training in application of the policy. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review nursing models of care and generate recommendations for a standardised care-delivery model.

Verbatim wording from the response

“When undertaking ward rounds, the care team have access to the patients full and comprehensive care record. However, it is accepted that there are occasions when the nursing summary is not as comprehensive as it should be. A full review of nursing models of care is to be undertaken by the Nursing Directorate with recommendations generated for a standardised model of care delivery (i.e. named professional / team nursing structure). This will facilitate a more comprehensive recording of a patients presenting needs state at any given time. Also a review of the existing multi professional weekly review meetings has been undertaken. The findings and recommendations will be taken to the Integrated Governance Group, chaired by the Executive Director of Nursing and Quality in October 2015. The review was completed by the Heads of Quality for each of the six local delivery units.”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission an audit of risk-assessment reviews across inpatient units.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Clinical Executive appreciates the Coroners comments re responsibility for reviewing and as a result have commissioned an audit of reviewing risks across inpatient units. The Clinical Executive will take the information from this audit and design a framework of staff responsibilities for all staff to follow.”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out local training on implementing the Engagement and Observation Policy across all Bristol wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Local training in the implementation of the Trust Engagement and Observation Policy has been rolled out across all wards in Bristol following learning from root cause analysis process.”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake monthly spot audits of caseload supervision records and present findings to the Integrated Governance Group from October 2015.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The monitoring of engagement and observation recording is through monthly management supervision. This is when the line manager sits with individual clinicians and goes through their caseload on the ward and highlights any issue or remedial actions to take. However, this has not been consistently monitored by the Clinical Executive; our plan is to undertake monthly spot audits of the caseload supervision records to ensure consistent application of the Engagement and Observation Policy. This audit will be taken to the Integrated Governance Group (IGG) meeting for action (attendees include Quality Directors from all localities). These audits will commence from October 2015.”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the risk-review audit findings to design a framework of staff responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Clinical Executive appreciates the Coroners comments re responsibility for reviewing and as a result have commissioned an audit of reviewing risks across inpatient units. The Clinical Executive will take the information from this audit and design a framework of staff responsibilities for all staff to follow.”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Engagement and Observation Policy already clearly defines engagement, observation and recording requirements, so policy revision is not indicated.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust Engagement and Observation Policy is based on guidance in the recently revised Mental Health Act Code of Practice, (Chapter 26, Safe and Therapeutic Responses to Disturbed Behaviour). The Policy is also informed by the recently published NICE Guidance - Violence and aggression: short-term management in mental health, health and community settings, (NICE 2015).”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing processes, including daily risk review and weekly multidisciplinary review, coordinate inpatient risk information without requiring one overarching reviewer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has in place processes and procedures for the co-ordinating of risk assessment information for inpatients.”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ward rounds have access to the patient's full comprehensive care record and do not rely solely on the nursing summary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. The Trust has a comprehensive single care record for each service users. However, the ward rounds rely only on a brief summary prepared by a nurse the night before when that nurse may not have made any entries in the care record nor would be present at the ward round. The Trust should review its planning and preparation for ward rounds so that reliance is not paced solely on a brief summary with the inherent risk of errors and omissions.”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Continue targeted inpatient suicide-prevention training and incorporate it into mandatory Care Programme Approach and risk training for inpatient staff.

    Stated by Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 July 2015.
  2. 2

    Design a new suicide-prevention training package.

    Stated by Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 17 July 2015.
  3. 3

    Present the multidisciplinary weekly review findings and recommendations to the Integrated Governance Group in October 2015.

    Stated by Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 July 2015.
  4. 4

    Complete the review of existing multidisciplinary weekly review meetings.

    Stated by Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 July 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue targeted inpatient suicide-prevention training and incorporate it into mandatory Care Programme Approach and risk training for inpatient staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During January to April 2015 the Trust carried out targeted training in inpatient suicide prevention. This included training in engagement and observation. The Trust plans to continue this targeted training between July and November 2015 and to include this as part of mandatory Care Programme Approach and Risk Training for inpatient staff from December 2015 onwards.”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design a new suicide-prevention training package.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are several Statutory and Mandatory Training Courses which cover the Engagement and Observation Policy; these are ‘Prevention and Management of Violence and Aggression (PMVA), ‘Violence and Aggression’ (Older Peoples Units); ‘Care Programme Approach’ (CPA). A new training package for Suicide Prevention is currently being designed.”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present the multidisciplinary weekly review findings and recommendations to the Integrated Governance Group in October 2015.

Verbatim wording from the response

“When undertaking ward rounds, the care team have access to the patients full and comprehensive care record. However, it is accepted that there are occasions when the nursing summary is not as comprehensive as it should be. A full review of nursing models of care is to be undertaken by the Nursing Directorate with recommendations generated for a standardised model of care delivery (i.e. named professional / team nursing structure). This will facilitate a more comprehensive recording of a patients presenting needs state at any given time. Also a review of the existing multi professional weekly review meetings has been undertaken. The findings and recommendations will be taken to the Integrated Governance Group, chaired by the Executive Director of Nursing and Quality in October 2015. The review was completed by the Heads of Quality for each of the six local delivery units.”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the review of existing multidisciplinary weekly review meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“When undertaking ward rounds, the care team have access to the patients full and comprehensive care record. However, it is accepted that there are occasions when the nursing summary is not as comprehensive as it should be. A full review of nursing models of care is to be undertaken by the Nursing Directorate with recommendations generated for a standardised model of care delivery (i.e. named professional / team nursing structure). This will facilitate a more comprehensive recording of a patients presenting needs state at any given time. Also a review of the existing multi professional weekly review meetings has been undertaken. The findings and recommendations will be taken to the Integrated Governance Group, chaired by the Executive Director of Nursing and Quality in October 2015. The review was completed by the Heads of Quality for each of the six local delivery units.”

Source location

2015-0283-Response-by-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 17 July 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026