PFD report

Mason John Portman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Aug 2024•West Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of road markings advising on appropriate speed or road curvature ahead
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road markings for road-user safety
  2. Lack of signs advising on appropriate speed or road curvature ahead
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Calderdale Council is responsible for the A672 carriageway and immediate slip-road interface beyond National Highways’ boundary, including associated signs and markings.

    Stated by National HighwaysRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of road markings advising on appropriate speed or road curvature ahead

Wider context from the report

“During the inquest I heard that Mason approached the location of the collision via the slip road that there were no road markings or signs displayed to advise on appropriate speed or road curvature ahead. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road markings for road-user safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of signs advising on appropriate speed or road curvature ahead

Wider context from the report

“During the inquest I heard that Mason approached the location of the collision via the slip road that there were no road markings or signs displayed to advise on appropriate speed or road curvature ahead. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Calderdale Council is responsible for the A672 carriageway and immediate slip-road interface beyond National Highways’ boundary, including associated signs and markings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that National Highways is the Highway Authority for the M62 motorway and the exit slip roads at junction 22. This extends up to the marked timber boundary fence and cattle grid at the interface with the A672. Beyond this point Calderdale Council is the relevant highway authority, including the A672 carriageway and immediate slip road interface.”

Source location

Response from National Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Current junction layout and signing adequately convey alignment and junction details; therefore no alterations to the layout or slip-road speed limit are proposed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In examining and assessing the current situation, we believe that the current layout and signing strategy adequately conveys the necessary and appropriate information regarding alignment and detail of the junction in order to enable the slip road and junction to be approached at an appropriate speed. We therefore do not propose any alterations to the current junction layout or speed limit along the slip road.”

Source location

Response from National Highways
Page 3 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Replace the damaged End of Motorway sign by the end of October 2024.

    Stated by National HighwaysStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 2 September 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replace the damaged End of Motorway sign by the end of October 2024.

Verbatim wording from the response

“v) At the time of the incident in question there was also a post mounted ‘End of Motorway Regulations’ sign installed in the nearside verge, in line with the cattle grid itself. This was damaged in the collision and at the time of the site visit had not been replaced.”

Source location

Response from National Highways
Page 2 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026