PFD report

Stephen Martin Verrall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Oct 2021•South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
12

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to routinely check window restrictors during regulatory inspections
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of external safety inspections to identify physical safety deficiencies
  2. Unavailability of weekend reception monitoring to prevent residents following visitors through the exit door
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to prevent unsafe unaccompanied exit by vulnerable care-home residents
  3. Failure to prevent unaccompanied exit by residents without capacity or ability to assess risk
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to control risks posed by care-home residents to themselves and othersPart of recurring concern: Failure to prevent unsafe unaccompanied exit by vulnerable care-home residents
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Advertise for a weekend receptionist to monitor the door at weekends.

    Stated by St Johns Nursing Home LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  2. Action

    Position a staff member by the side gate during fire drills and disable the gate's exit code.

    Stated by St Johns Nursing Home LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  3. Action

    Station the administrator in reception during normal working hours to monitor the entrance and secure door closure.

    Stated by St Johns Nursing Home LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    CQC will not introduce routine window-restrictor checks because provider risk management remains within its existing assessment framework.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely check window restrictors during regulatory inspections

Wider context from the report

“(1) Care Quality Commission – I was informed that CQC did not routinely check window restrictors on inspections. I was told that it was the responsibility of providers to comply with regulatory requirements in this regard. Whilst that is uncontroversial, the death in this case, and the fact that there remained unrestricted windows in August 2021 nearly four years after this death, demonstrated that checks by the regulator are required. Responsive checks after incidents are not sufficient to prevent deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of external safety inspections to identify physical safety deficiencies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of weekend reception monitoring to prevent residents following visitors through the exit door

Wider context from the report

“(2) St John’s Nursing Home – I heard that Stephen had managed to leave the home unaccompanied on several occasions. The opportunity to do so for those without capacity and without the ability to assess risk poses a risk to their lives. I was told that the reception is not manned on the weekends and there is a risk that residents may follow visitors through the door when they leave. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to prevent unsafe unaccompanied exit by vulnerable care-home residents.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prevent unaccompanied exit by residents without capacity or ability to assess risk

Wider context from the report

“(2) St John’s Nursing Home – I heard that Stephen had managed to leave the home unaccompanied on several occasions. The opportunity to do so for those without capacity and without the ability to assess risk poses a risk to their lives. I was told that the reception is not manned on the weekends and there is a risk that residents may follow visitors through the door when they leave. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to control risks posed by care-home residents to themselves and others; Failure to prevent unsafe unaccompanied exit by vulnerable care-home residents.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Advertise for a weekend receptionist to monitor the door at weekends.

Verbatim wording from the response

“iv. We are advertising for a weekend receptionist to ensure going forwards the door is monitored at weekends. In the interim, all staff are ensuring the door is closed securely behind them;”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Position a staff member by the side gate during fire drills and disable the gate's exit code.

Verbatim wording from the response

“v. We ensure that when there is a fire drill a member of staff stands by the side gate. This gate is key coded for exit, which is disabled during fire drills. The member of staff ensures residents do not leave the premises;”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Station the administrator in reception during normal working hours to monitor the entrance and secure door closure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“iii. During normal working hours, the administrator is situated in the reception area and ensures staff securely closes the door behind them;”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Restrict visitor access codes and require staff accompaniment for entry and exit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“i. Visitors are not given the key code, which is changed regularly, for entry or exit so are accompanied by a member of staff;”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Advise staff about unauthorised exits and require secure door closure and vigilance around reception.

Verbatim wording from the response

“ii. All staff have been advised of the potential problem of residents leaving through the front door. When letting visitors in and out of the building staff ensure the door is securely closed behind them and they have been advised to be alert around the reception area during the course of their working day/night;”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a targeted inspection of St John’s Nursing Home and follow up the Warning Notice to assess window safety and compliance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the inquest we carried out a responsive “targeted” inspection of St John’s Nursing Home. “Targeted” inspections do not change the rating from the previous inspection but allow us to identify areas requiring action from the provider. This is because they do not assess all areas of a key question.”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-Care-Quality-Commission_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Check at the next inspection that St John’s Nursing Home has embedded its premises-security changes and is effectively minimising identified risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to inspecting St John’s Nursing Home on 13 October 2021, we also wrote to the registered provider on 21 October 2021 and asked them to provide any further information and supporting evidence about the action they have taken or intend to take in response to your report. We received a response from the registered provider on 22 October 2021.”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-Care-Quality-Commission_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

CQC will not introduce routine window-restrictor checks because provider risk management remains within its existing assessment framework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the hearing we have met with the CQC Policy team to discuss your specific concerns and how they relate to the regulatory requirements, in particular, Regulation 12, Safe Care and Treatment | Care Quality Commission (cqc.org.uk), Regulation 15, Premises and equipment Regulation 15: Premises and equipment | Care Quality Commission (cqc.org.uk) and Regulation 17, Good governance Regulation 17: Good governance | Care Quality Commission (cqc.org.uk).”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-Care-Quality-Commission_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Providers remain responsible for ensuring adequate window restrictors and checking their robustness and compliance with relevant guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

““During our inspections, inspectors do not routinely check window restrictors as part of an inspection. However, inspectors may check some restrictors where observations on the day or information we receive prior to inspection identifies concerns. However, inspectors will check the systems and processes are in place to enable the provider to assess and monitor the quality of services and to identify, assess and manage risks to ensure people are protected against the risks of receiving inappropriate or unsafe care or treatment. It is care providers responsibility to ensure there are adequate window restrictors in place. It is also the provider’s responsibility to carry out adequate checks on the window restrictors to confirm that they are sufficiently robust and complied with the relevant guidance.””

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-Care-Quality-Commission_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Introduce daily boundary-fence checks by the maintenance technician to identify weather damage and exposed areas.

    Stated by St Johns Nursing Home LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  2. 2

    Implement a Herbert Protocol containing residents' identifying and relevant health information for police use after an absconding.

    Stated by St Johns Nursing Home LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  3. 3

    Fit window restrictors throughout the building in line with guidance.

    Stated by St Johns Nursing Home LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  4. 4

    Progress regulatory action addressing the provider’s ineffective systems for assessing, monitoring and mitigating environmental safety risks.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  5. 5

    Develop the new single assessment framework with a specific focus on safe environments and providers’ detection and control of care-environment risks.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce daily boundary-fence checks by the maintenance technician to identify weather damage and exposed areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“vii. A newly introduced daily check ensures the maintenance technician checks the premises boundary fences to ensure there is no weather damage leading to exposed areas; and”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a Herbert Protocol containing residents' identifying and relevant health information for police use after an absconding.

Verbatim wording from the response

“viii. A ‘Herbert Protocol’ has been put in place for any resident that we feel poses a risk of absconding. This is a form which sets out the person’s details including name, date of birth, address, description, health details and places of interest so that should, despite the measures in place abscond, all details are readily available to provide to the Police.”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fit window restrictors throughout the building in line with guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“vi. All windows in the building have had window restrictors fitted in line with guidance;”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Progress regulatory action addressing the provider’s ineffective systems for assessing, monitoring and mitigating environmental safety risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, we remained concerned about governance at the service including the effectiveness of audits.”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-Care-Quality-Commission_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop the new single assessment framework with a specific focus on safe environments and providers’ detection and control of care-environment risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the hearing we have met with the CQC Policy team to discuss your specific concerns and how they relate to the regulatory requirements, in particular, Regulation 12, Safe Care and Treatment | Care Quality Commission (cqc.org.uk), Regulation 15, Premises and equipment Regulation 15: Premises and equipment | Care Quality Commission (cqc.org.uk) and Regulation 17, Good governance Regulation 17: Good governance | Care Quality Commission (cqc.org.uk).”

Source location

2021-0336-Response-from-Care-Quality-Commission_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026