PFD report

Alan Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Feb 2021•Gwent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
15

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to provide required enhanced supervision for high-falls-risk patients
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate Enhanced Care SupervisionPart of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
  2. Failure to provide multidisciplinary falls prevention and management
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
  3. Unsafe ward staffing levels failing to account for fluctuations in patient acuity
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Action

    Develop and implement a multidisciplinary falls-policy implementation plan, including ward-based and online staff training.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 March 2021.
  2. Action

    Increase the substantive Health Care Support Worker workforce to support enhanced care and continuity.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 March 2021.
  3. Action

    Revise the Falls Policy for Hospital Adult Inpatients to define multidisciplinary assessment, care planning and professional responsibilities.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 March 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Some temporary staffing requests could not be filled despite escalation and other reasonable steps to address identified nurse staffing deficits.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide required enhanced supervision for high-falls-risk patients

Wider context from the report

“1:1 Supervision Throughout Mr Jones’ admission I heard evidence that he required either 1:1 supervision (Enhanced Care Level 5) or to be supervised in a cohorted bay (Enhanced Care Level 4). This level of care was not achieved and as a result within less than 3 weeks of his admission, Mr Jones had fallen on 7 occasions, at times as a direct result of a failure to provide adequate supervision. I am satisfied that the nursing staff were aware of the level of supervision required and regularly requested additional nursing support. These requests were not resourced. It appears that the nursing staff had become used to this situation and tried to do the best they could in the circumstances. It also appeared that a ward which cares for patients who are the most likely to require extra support because they are confused, elderly and at risk of falls, is staffed to a minimum level which does not take account of any fluctuations in acuity. Of concern was that despite hearing evidence that improvements in falls management had been introduced, I also heard evidence that nursing staff on the ward continue to find themselves nursing with unsafe levels of staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate Enhanced Care Supervision; Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide multidisciplinary falls prevention and management

Wider context from the report

“Multidisciplinary Care Mr Jones’ level of confusion and his agitation appears to have increased during his admission and yet I have seen no evidence of a truly multidisciplinary approach to how this should be managed. The risk assessment is multifactorial but the evidence presented suggested that care lies wholly within the nursing domain. Throughout this time, Mr Jones was clearly in the highest category of falls risk, he was confused, agitated, unsafe on his feet and yet there is no evidence that nurses and doctors and physios and pharmacists met together to discuss how these problems would be managed. The fact that during Mr Jones’ hospital stay from 25th October 2019 to his death on 14th November 2019 he fell 7 times and the last time resulted in his death, demonstrates a complete failure in the falls prevention strategy at ABUHB. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unsafe ward staffing levels failing to account for fluctuations in patient acuity

Wider context from the report

“1:1 Supervision Throughout Mr Jones’ admission I heard evidence that he required either 1:1 supervision (Enhanced Care Level 5) or to be supervised in a cohorted bay (Enhanced Care Level 4). This level of care was not achieved and as a result within less than 3 weeks of his admission, Mr Jones had fallen on 7 occasions, at times as a direct result of a failure to provide adequate supervision. I am satisfied that the nursing staff were aware of the level of supervision required and regularly requested additional nursing support. These requests were not resourced. It appears that the nursing staff had become used to this situation and tried to do the best they could in the circumstances. It also appeared that a ward which cares for patients who are the most likely to require extra support because they are confused, elderly and at risk of falls, is staffed to a minimum level which does not take account of any fluctuations in acuity. Of concern was that despite hearing evidence that improvements in falls management had been introduced, I also heard evidence that nursing staff on the ward continue to find themselves nursing with unsafe levels of staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and implement a multidisciplinary falls-policy implementation plan, including ward-based and online staff training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Health Board recognises that publishing a revised policy will not in itself enable the required change in emphasis towards multidisciplinary care planning and so a policy implementation plan is being developed. The policy implementation plan will be overseen and monitored by the Falls & Bone Health Steering Group, which is both multidisciplinary in its membership and also diverse in representing all divisions across the Health Board. The Falls & Bone Health Steering Group reports to the Health Board’s Quality and Patient Safety Committee (a formal committee of the Board). The implementation plan will largely focus on training, targeting the multidisciplinary team and will be delivered both through online learning but also, importantly, through face to face training on the wards.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase the substantive Health Care Support Worker workforce to support enhanced care and continuity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“previously identified a need for an increase in Health Care Support Worker’s to support enhanced care by night and as a consequence the substantive HCSW workforce was increased to support this requirement.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the Falls Policy for Hospital Adult Inpatients to define multidisciplinary assessment, care planning and professional responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your concerns as set out in the Regulation 28 notice, rightly point to the care planning that follows from the initial multifactorial assessment when a patient arrives on a ward or their circumstances change. To be effective in reducing falls and protecting patients from related harm, the care plan must be multidisciplinary, which the Health Board has recognised in revising its Falls Policy for Hospital Adult Inpatients. The entire policy has been reviewed through this lens, to make clear the responsibilities of all professions and disciplines that can contribute to the care of a hospital patient. The policy makes clear the expectation of joint multidisciplinary assessment and care planning. The policy revisions have been completed and are awaiting ratification by the Health Board’s Clinical Standards and Policy Group before publication.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain registered-nurse and Health Care Support Worker pools on acute sites to support staff deployment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The establishment of Registered Nurse and HCSW pools on each acute site to support deployment of staff – taking all reasonable steps to ensure planned rosters were maintained on a backdrop of significant absenteeism and fluctuation in capacity required to manage the pandemic.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Evaluate falls training and monitor compliance, including multidisciplinary participation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Informing the training will be learning taken directly from serious incident investigations involving hospital falls, using actual case studies. The training will be evaluated and compliance will be monitored, including multidisciplinary participation.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Obtain ratification and publish the revised Falls Policy for Hospital Adult Inpatients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your concerns as set out in the Regulation 28 notice, rightly point to the care planning that follows from the initial multifactorial assessment when a patient arrives on a ward or their circumstances change. To be effective in reducing falls and protecting patients from related harm, the care plan must be multidisciplinary, which the Health Board has recognised in revising its Falls Policy for Hospital Adult Inpatients. The entire policy has been reviewed through this lens, to make clear the responsibilities of all professions and disciplines that can contribute to the care of a hospital patient. The policy makes clear the expectation of joint multidisciplinary assessment and care planning. The policy revisions have been completed and are awaiting ratification by the Health Board’s Clinical Standards and Policy Group before publication.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce ward-level Falls Prevention Collaboratives using quality-improvement methods, thematic reviews and multidisciplinary participation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To further support awareness of the multidisciplinary requirements set out in the revised policy, a Health Board wide communications campaign will be developed and launched to coincide with the publication of the policy. The Falls & Bone Health Steering Group has also developed an action plan for reducing inpatient falls (enclosed). This action plan includes a wide range of action beyond the revision of the policy. A key action in the plan is introducing ‘Falls Prevention Collaboratives’, which utilise quality improvement methodologies which support identification of specific areas for focus alongside thematic reviews. The ‘Collaboratives’ follow a similar approach adopted by the Health Board to successfully reduce pressure damage in hospital; they are delivered at ward level with full multidisciplinary participation.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and monitor completion of falls-prevention actions and evidence of multidisciplinary care-plan participation and ownership.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In direct response to the Coroner’s concerns about multidisciplinary care, the Falls & Bone Health Steering Group will be actively reviewing and monitoring completion of the actions described, with a clear expectation that multidisciplinary participation and ownership of falls prevention care plans can be evidenced.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce and embed the multidisciplinary core care team model, including assistant practitioners, roster creators and ward assistants.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In 2019, on the backdrop of significant vacancies, circa 350 Whole Time Equivalent (WTE), it was imperative that the Health Board considered new roles and responsibilities for acute wards, promoting the principle of the ‘Prudent Registered Nurse’ with emphasis on appropriate and safe delegation practices. The core care team model was introduced as a result of a collaborative approach between Divisional and Corporate Nursing together with Workforce and Organisational Development. Ward 4/1 was identified as an ideal ward to embed this new model due to the dependency of the patients cared for, hence the recalculation undertaken in September 2019 incorporated the core care team model. The core care team comprised of several different roles, to include:”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Some temporary staffing requests could not be filled despite escalation and other reasonable steps to address identified nurse staffing deficits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Clear processes are in place within the Health Board to escalate any staffing deficits with the planned roster and/or any requests for additional staffing requirements. At the time of Mr Jones’ fall the Health Board had in place a Nurse Staffing Escalation Policy which articulates everyone responsibility, from Ward to Board, in maintaining appropriate nurse staffing levels and sets out clear actions if there is a deviation from what is required. In addition, daily site meetings occur to manage nurse staffing levels, consider any deficits, manage and identify any potential risks and escalate any supplementary requirements to the Resource Bank. There is clear evidence, by way of ‘Healthroster’, to indicate there was a recognition and identified need to increase nurse staffing levels to manage enhanced care on many occasions throughout Mr Jones’s admission.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Strengthen serious-incident investigations by requiring additional clarity and documented evidence for statements about care, treatment, assessments and observations.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 March 2021.
  2. 2

    Engage the multidisciplinary team in falls investigations and subsequent reporting of findings.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 March 2021.
  3. 3

    Participate in the All-Wales task-and-finish group developing a consistent approach to reporting patient-safety RIDDORs.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 March 2021.
  4. 4

    Review the RIDDOR Standard Operating Procedure and add a section on reporting patient falls.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 March 2021.
  5. 5

    Develop a Datix dashboard to identify falls resulting in significant harm for RIDDOR reporting.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 March 2021.
  6. 6

    Develop and launch a Health Board-wide communications campaign on multidisciplinary falls-prevention requirements.

    Stated by Aneurin Bevan University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 March 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen serious-incident investigations by requiring additional clarity and documented evidence for statements about care, treatment, assessments and observations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The falls which occurred on the 29th October and the 9th November also detail a request for neurological observations as part of the post fall clinical review. On both occasions the clinical records on our Care Flow System show no evidence that the required observations were undertaken. It is clear that, despite the request from the ‘Immediate Assessment following an Inpatient Fall’ for neurological observations, on two of the occasions, this was not completed fully as required.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage the multidisciplinary team in falls investigations and subsequent reporting of findings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“and classified as severe harm, are investigated and presented to the Falls Review Panel, which is multidisciplinary in membership. Hospital falls classified as catastrophic harm are subject to an Executive led investigation, again involving the entire multidisciplinary team. In response to the need to ensure multidisciplinary participation in patient care planning to prevent falls, then it is essential that accountability sits with the multidisciplinary team and that they are all involved in the incident investigations. It is true that in the recent past that the Health Board investigation of falls and reporting (whether to the falls review panel, to Exec led investigations and even to the Coroner enquires) has fallen largely to nursing colleagues.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Participate in the All-Wales task-and-finish group developing a consistent approach to reporting patient-safety RIDDORs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To enable the Health Board to meet the requirements of RIDDOR a dashboard has been developed within the Datix Incident Reporting system to allow visibility of any falls resulting in significant harm. We have also reviewed the Standard Operating Procedure for RIDDOR and incorporated a new section on reporting patient falls. In addition, our Health Board’s Head of Health and Safety will be participating in a newly established All-Wales task and finish group to look at the reporting of patient safety RIDDOR’s to ensure that we have a consistent approach across NHS Wales.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the RIDDOR Standard Operating Procedure and add a section on reporting patient falls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To enable the Health Board to meet the requirements of RIDDOR a dashboard has been developed within the Datix Incident Reporting system to allow visibility of any falls resulting in significant harm. We have also reviewed the Standard Operating Procedure for RIDDOR and incorporated a new section on reporting patient falls. In addition, our Health Board’s Head of Health and Safety will be participating in a newly established All-Wales task and finish group to look at the reporting of patient safety RIDDOR’s to ensure that we have a consistent approach across NHS Wales.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a Datix dashboard to identify falls resulting in significant harm for RIDDOR reporting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To enable the Health Board to meet the requirements of RIDDOR a dashboard has been developed within the Datix Incident Reporting system to allow visibility of any falls resulting in significant harm. We have also reviewed the Standard Operating Procedure for RIDDOR and incorporated a new section on reporting patient falls. In addition, our Health Board’s Head of Health and Safety will be participating in a newly established All-Wales task and finish group to look at the reporting of patient safety RIDDOR’s to ensure that we have a consistent approach across NHS Wales.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and launch a Health Board-wide communications campaign on multidisciplinary falls-prevention requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To further support awareness of the multidisciplinary requirements set out in the revised policy, a Health Board wide communications campaign will be developed and launched to coincide with the publication of the policy. The Falls & Bone Health Steering Group has also developed an action plan for reducing inpatient falls (enclosed). This action plan includes a wide range of action beyond the revision of the policy. A key action in the plan is introducing ‘Falls Prevention Collaboratives’, which utilise quality improvement methodologies which support identification of specific areas for focus alongside thematic reviews. The ‘Collaboratives’ follow a similar approach adopted by the Health Board to successfully reduce pressure damage in hospital; they are delivered at ward level with full multidisciplinary participation.”

Source location

2021-0079-Response-from-Aneurin-Bevan-University-Health-Board-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 30 March 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026