PFD report

George Kyriacos Petrou · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Oct 2024•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure of mental health in-reach staff to follow guidance when deciding whether prisoners require suicide watch or ACCT
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of mental health in-reach staff to follow guidance when deciding whether prisoners require suicide watch or ACCT

Wider context from the report

“1) Evidence from members of staff at the Trust, working in the prison at that time, gave the distinct impression that there were a number of members of the mental health in-reach team that placed significant weight on a prisoner telling them that they did not want to be placed on any form of suicide watch and/or ACCT. This was contrary to the guidance, policy and procedures in place. While not being placed on an ACCT was not a causative factor in Mr Petrou’s case, it nonetheless raises a risk of death in the future. In my view, witnesses from the Trust provided insufficient reassurance that this matter has been addressed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.