PFD report

Oliver Christopher Lindsay · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Apr 2022•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to ensure widespread understanding of the risks of fetal growth restriction
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate safety-critical care information effectively between care providers and families
  2. Delays in providing urgently required fetal growth scans
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely urgent diagnostic investigations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure widespread understanding of the risks of fetal growth restriction

Wider context from the report

“2. The inquest heard evidence from a number of obstetricians about the very significant risks fetal growth restriction presented to the health of a baby. There was clear evidence that the risks of fetal growth restriction were not widely understood outside experienced obstetric professionals and that greater understanding and clarity of the risks was important in helping all those involved. This was particularly true in relation to parents faced with a sudden change at a difficult time. It was suggested during the inquest that as part of the Saving Babies bundle a FAQ sheet should be developed for parents which set out what fetal growth restriction is ; the risks it presented to a baby at various stages of a pregnancy and the national guidance to reduce risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate safety-critical care information effectively between care providers and families.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in providing urgently required fetal growth scans

Wider context from the report

“1. At his mother’s midwife check-up, it was identified that Oliver may have fetal growth restriction and that a scan was urgently required. A referral was made to the acute trust. However scanning capacity issues meant that there was a delay in an appointment being offered. Oliver’s parents were very concerned and felt they had no choice but to pay to have a private scan which did confirm fetal growth restriction and resulted in his mother attending the acute trust to be seen. The inquest heard evidence that there were capacity issues in relation to growth scans nationally particularly after a bank holiday or a weekend. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely urgent diagnostic investigations.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026