PFD report

Mrs. Hilda May Harris · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Apr 2015•Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
5

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 5 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Unreliable booking system for community INR testing
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe anticoagulant management
  2. Unreliable notification system for omissions by family or carers
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unreliable booking system for community INR testing

Wider context from the report

“(1) The current booking system for community INR testing is unreliable with scope for appointments not being transferred from one set of papers to another. (2) Where an omission occurs, the notification system (by the family or carers) also appears unreliable. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe anticoagulant management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unreliable notification system for omissions by family or carers

Wider context from the report

“(1) The current booking system for community INR testing is unreliable with scope for appointments not being transferred from one set of papers to another. (2) Where an omission occurs, the notification system (by the family or carers) also appears unreliable. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Develop a corrective Action Plan for Improvement to capture the Health Board’s response and monitor improvements.

    Stated by Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 April 2015.
  2. 2

    Take forward the corrective actions through the Primary Community & Localities Directorate and record progress in the attached plan.

    Stated by Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 April 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a corrective Action Plan for Improvement to capture the Health Board’s response and monitor improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Action taken to plan and monitor improvements”

Source location

2015-0161-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 24 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Take forward the corrective actions through the Primary Community & Localities Directorate and record progress in the attached plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Actions implemented”

Source location

2015-0161-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 24 April 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/5

Data last updated 7 September 2026