PFD report

John Thorp · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Feb 2019•West London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Inconsistent prescribing of TED stockings across treatment areas
  2. Lack of a facility for recording administration or non-administration of TED stockings
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Disseminate TED stocking prescribing and checking instructions to clinical staff through area-specific memos, junior-doctor education, the Trust newsletter and desktop screensavers.

    Stated by London North West University Healthcare NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 June 2019.
  2. Action

    Implement a Trust-wide standardised prescription chart with dedicated TED stocking prescription and daily nursing checks of fitting and skin integrity.

    Stated by London North West University Healthcare NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 June 2019.
  3. Action

    Add prescription-chart completion checks to Matrons’ Quality Walkabouts for auditing and monitoring.

    Stated by London North West University Healthcare NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 June 2019.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inconsistent prescribing of TED stockings across treatment areas

Wider context from the report

“(1) Evidence given at the inquest by a senior nurse and Consultant indicated that only a doctor could prescribe TED stockings. There were three different prescriptions for TED stockings in the three different areas where Mr Thorp was treated. The standard ward based drug chart had a tick box in the low molecular weight heparin box on the drug chart for whether TED stockings were indicated. (2) Evidence was given at the inquest that the medical staff where inconsistent in how they prescribed TED stockings. One of Mr Thorp’s drug charts had simply a tick in the box indicating there were required but there was nowhere for nursing staff to sign if they were given. Another drug chart had a separate prescription with the stockings being written up as a regular item and nurses could fill in the prescription chart to indicate if they had been given, or if not given the reasons why not. (3) There was evidence given that this inconsistency in the way in which medical staff prescribed TED stockings may lead to stockings being prescribed but not given which may in turn increase the risk of thromboembolic formation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a facility for recording administration or non-administration of TED stockings

Wider context from the report

“(1) Evidence given at the inquest by a senior nurse and Consultant indicated that only a doctor could prescribe TED stockings. There were three different prescriptions for TED stockings in the three different areas where Mr Thorp was treated. The standard ward based drug chart had a tick box in the low molecular weight heparin box on the drug chart for whether TED stockings were indicated. (2) Evidence was given at the inquest that the medical staff where inconsistent in how they prescribed TED stockings. One of Mr Thorp’s drug charts had simply a tick in the box indicating there were required but there was nowhere for nursing staff to sign if they were given. Another drug chart had a separate prescription with the stockings being written up as a regular item and nurses could fill in the prescription chart to indicate if they had been given, or if not given the reasons why not. (3) There was evidence given that this inconsistency in the way in which medical staff prescribed TED stockings may lead to stockings being prescribed but not given which may in turn increase the risk of thromboembolic formation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate TED stocking prescribing and checking instructions to clinical staff through area-specific memos, junior-doctor education, the Trust newsletter and desktop screensavers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The actions required have been shared by way of memos to all clinical staff. Junior Doctors have received the instructions via the Medical Education Department. Three separate memos were created to ensure the different clinical areas received the information to be acted upon.”

Source location

2019-0067-Response-by-London-North-West-University-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 2 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a Trust-wide standardised prescription chart with dedicated TED stocking prescription and daily nursing checks of fitting and skin integrity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has formulated a new, standardised prescription chart to be used across the Trust. The new chart has a section for the prescribing of TED stockings.”

Source location

2019-0067-Response-by-London-North-West-University-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 2 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add prescription-chart completion checks to Matrons’ Quality Walkabouts for auditing and monitoring.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This has also been included as part of the Matron’s Quality Walkabout for auditing and monitoring to ensure that this section is being completed by the doctors and nurses.”

Source location

2019-0067-Response-by-London-North-West-University-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 2 June 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026