PFD report

Edward Cockburn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Dec 2021•Newcastle upon Tyne

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of a procedure to record and audit SafeCare training delivery and efficacy
  2. Failure to provide SafeCare system training to relevant staff
  3. Failure to ensure staff awareness of the Standard Operating Procedure for Enhanced Care/Observation
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable staff access to and understanding of safety-critical guidance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Review the fitting instructions and confirm they remain suitable and fit for purpose.

    Stated by The Jackloc Company LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2021.
  2. Action

    Amend the data sheet so it expressly permits fitting Part A to either the window frame or sill, and issue the amended version going forward.

    Stated by The Jackloc Company LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 December 2021.
  3. Action

    Create organisational, ward and department reports to monitor and audit completion of SafeCare and EICO training.

    Stated by South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 December 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Existing fitting instructions are considered suitable, so they will not be altered and Trusts and users will not be separately contacted.

    Stated by The Jackloc Company LimitedExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a procedure to record and audit SafeCare training delivery and efficacy

Wider context from the report

“Staff appeared to be unaware of the Trusts Standard Operating Procedure in relation to Enhanced Care/Observation. Training at that time had not been given to relevant members of staff in connection with the SafeCare system. Whilst training and information had been cascaded there was no procedure in place in relation to any training that could record and thereafter audit the efficacy of that system with particular regard to when the training was delivered and by whom and to whom it was delivered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide SafeCare system training to relevant staff

Wider context from the report

“Staff appeared to be unaware of the Trusts Standard Operating Procedure in relation to Enhanced Care/Observation. Training at that time had not been given to relevant members of staff in connection with the SafeCare system. Whilst training and information had been cascaded there was no procedure in place in relation to any training that could record and thereafter audit the efficacy of that system with particular regard to when the training was delivered and by whom and to whom it was delivered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure staff awareness of the Standard Operating Procedure for Enhanced Care/Observation

Wider context from the report

“Staff appeared to be unaware of the Trusts Standard Operating Procedure in relation to Enhanced Care/Observation. Training at that time had not been given to relevant members of staff in connection with the SafeCare system. Whilst training and information had been cascaded there was no procedure in place in relation to any training that could record and thereafter audit the efficacy of that system with particular regard to when the training was delivered and by whom and to whom it was delivered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable staff access to and understanding of safety-critical guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unsafe positioning of window restrictor fixings on pivot-window sills

Wider context from the report

“The fixing was attached to the sill of the window in accordance with fitting instructions issued by Jacklok and dated July 2017. Subsequent to the installation a data sheet was issued indicating that the fixing should be attached to the window frame only. This change in data/guidance was not highlighted to South Tyneside and Sunderland NHs Trust and presumably other hospital trusts. The position of the fixing on the sill enabled the restrictor to be more readily defeated bearing in mind this was a pivot window Jacklok have been requested to take action as follows (a) To ensure that the guidance is changed clarify the necessity to attach the fixing to the frame and proximity to the points of pivot (b) To ensure that this is effectively communicated to and highlighted with all NHS Trusts and other relevant users using the Jackloc window restrictor system The relevant Department guidance is Health Building Note 00-10Part D Windows and Associated Hardware ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate changes in window restrictor fixing guidance to hospital trusts

Wider context from the report

“The fixing was attached to the sill of the window in accordance with fitting instructions issued by Jacklok and dated July 2017. Subsequent to the installation a data sheet was issued indicating that the fixing should be attached to the window frame only. This change in data/guidance was not highlighted to South Tyneside and Sunderland NHs Trust and presumably other hospital trusts. The position of the fixing on the sill enabled the restrictor to be more readily defeated bearing in mind this was a pivot window Jacklok have been requested to take action as follows (a) To ensure that the guidance is changed clarify the necessity to attach the fixing to the frame and proximity to the points of pivot (b) To ensure that this is effectively communicated to and highlighted with all NHS Trusts and other relevant users using the Jackloc window restrictor system The relevant Department guidance is Health Building Note 00-10Part D Windows and Associated Hardware ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the fitting instructions and confirm they remain suitable and fit for purpose.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Please be assured that in view of your Report the Company and I have very carefully reviewed the fitting instructions and we are satisfied that they are suitable and fit for purpose. We consider that it would be wrong to change them to remove the reference to the window sill because the part A locking body can be fixed to the sill and to do so will be no less safe than securing it to the window frame, always provided that the following direction from the fitting instructions is heeded –”

Source location

2021-0415-Response-from-Jackloc-Company-Ltd_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the data sheet so it expressly permits fitting Part A to either the window frame or sill, and issue the amended version going forward.

Verbatim wording from the response

“What the Company has resolved to do is to amend the data sheet to make it align it and ensure it is consistent with the fitting instructions and from this point onwards all the data sheets we supply will expressly allow for fitting Part A to either the frame or the sill (copy attached). This will avoid any confusion for those who have and may refer to both the fitting instructions and the data sheets.”

Source location

2021-0415-Response-from-Jackloc-Company-Ltd_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create organisational, ward and department reports to monitor and audit completion of SafeCare and EICO training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have now agreed a mechanism to address these actions by utilising our existing Electronic Staff Record (ESR) system. We are developing E-learning packages for both SafeCare and EICO which will be uploaded to the ESR and easily accessible to staff. Staff who require this training will have an associated competency added to their learning profile and compliance matrix within ESR. This will allow the creation of reports to capture and monitor/audit completion of this E-learning at an organisational level, as well as a ward/department level.”

Source location

2021-0415-Response-from-Sunderland-Royal-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add required SafeCare and EICO competencies to staff learning profiles and compliance matrices within the Electronic Staff Record system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have now agreed a mechanism to address these actions by utilising our existing Electronic Staff Record (ESR) system. We are developing E-learning packages for both SafeCare and EICO which will be uploaded to the ESR and easily accessible to staff. Staff who require this training will have an associated competency added to their learning profile and compliance matrix within ESR. This will allow the creation of reports to capture and monitor/audit completion of this E-learning at an organisational level, as well as a ward/department level.”

Source location

2021-0415-Response-from-Sunderland-Royal-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete remedial estates work by fitting additional window restrictors and swipe-card access to restricted areas across key Trust areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our internal investigation identified omissions in care with regard to the level of observation in place for Mr Cockburn and the lack of escalation of concerns around staffing levels. Immediate actions were undertaken to address these issues, along with remedial estates work to fit additional window restrictors and swipe card access to restricted areas in key areas across the Trust, which has now been completed.”

Source location

2021-0415-Response-from-Sunderland-Royal-Hospital_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop E-learning packages for SafeCare and EICO and make them accessible to relevant staff through the Electronic Staff Record system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have now agreed a mechanism to address these actions by utilising our existing Electronic Staff Record (ESR) system. We are developing E-learning packages for both SafeCare and EICO which will be uploaded to the ESR and easily accessible to staff. Staff who require this training will have an associated competency added to their learning profile and compliance matrix within ESR. This will allow the creation of reports to capture and monitor/audit completion of this E-learning at an organisational level, as well as a ward/department level.”

Source location

2021-0415-Response-from-Sunderland-Royal-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing fitting instructions are considered suitable, so they will not be altered and Trusts and users will not be separately contacted.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I wish to make it very clear that the Company and I understand fully the reasons that led you to conclude that a Regulation 28 Report should be required, and we intend you no disrespect in saying that, given everything set out above, we do not propose to alter the fitting instructions and, because the instructions are and remain suitable and fit for purpose it is not considered necessary nor appropriate for us to communicate with Trusts and other users in accordance with paragraph 6 of your Report.”

Source location

2021-0415-Response-from-Jackloc-Company-Ltd_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fitting Part A to the sill is no less safe than fitting it to the window frame when correctly installed and secure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This does not mean that the restrictor is any less effective if, in accordance with the fitting instructions Part A is fixed to the window sill – always provided that whatever it is fixed to, it is correctly fitted and secure.”

Source location

2021-0415-Response-from-Jackloc-Company-Ltd_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Update the enhanced care and observation procedure into the Guideline for Enhanced Interactive Care and Observation for Adult Inpatients.

    Stated by South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2021.
  2. 2

    Oversee action progress and report it monthly to the Trust Governance Committee.

    Stated by South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 December 2021.
  3. 3

    Use the Electronic Staff Record model to monitor training achievement when other new training programmes are introduced.

    Stated by South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 December 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the enhanced care and observation procedure into the Guideline for Enhanced Interactive Care and Observation for Adult Inpatients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At the inquest hearing, you heard evidence from one of the witnesses that staff appeared to be unaware of the Trust Enhanced Care/Observation Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)¹ that was in place at that time. I would like to take this opportunity to inform you that this SOP was updated in December 2020 and is now entitled “Guideline for Enhanced Interactive Care and Observation (EICO) for Adult Inpatients”.”

Source location

2021-0415-Response-from-Sunderland-Royal-Hospital_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Oversee action progress and report it monthly to the Trust Governance Committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you will note, the Trust is addressing the shortfalls highlighted during the Inquest, in order to prevent future deaths in similar circumstances. Progress of actions detailed in this letter will be overseen by Melanie Johnson, Executive Director of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals, who will also keep me briefed and report progress monthly to the Trust’s Governance Committee.”

Source location

2021-0415-Response-from-Sunderland-Royal-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the Electronic Staff Record model to monitor training achievement when other new training programmes are introduced.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would like to assure you that this work is progressing well and we intend to utilise this model to monitor the training achievements when other new training programmes are introduced.”

Source location

2021-0415-Response-from-Sunderland-Royal-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026