PFD report

Max Carlton-Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Jan 2015•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
9

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised9

  1. Failure to provide on-site medical assistance at unlicensed raves
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable on-site emergency medical and first-aid response arrangementsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable safety planning for organised dance music events
  2. Insufficient police resources to close down illegal rave venues
  3. Barricading of rave venues against police and other emergency access
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable emergency access arrangements for respondersPart of recurring concern: Unreliable emergency arrangements for organised public events
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Using statutory powers to prevent and stop illegal raves is an operational matter for the police.

    Stated by Home OfficeRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide on-site medical assistance at unlicensed raves

Wider context from the report

“The organizers of the unlicensed rave had not provided on-site medical assistance and had spent between 12 and 42 minutes before calling the ambulance service, when the deceased collapsed. There was inadequate ventilation for a very hot venue, and fire exits and procedure had not been regulated. The organizers had taken over an empty squatted commercial building and barricaded against those who attempted to enter, (including police, who attended and spoke earlier to a security man and then later following complaints of noise). I concluded that had the event been licensed and normal facilities and regulation in place, he would probably not have died when he did. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable on-site emergency medical and first-aid response arrangements; Unreliable safety planning for organised dance music events.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient police resources to close down illegal rave venues

Wider context from the report

“Police evidence was that they had no power to enter (nor had the ambulance service) a commercial premises (as opposed to private premises) that had been squatted unless a crime had been committed or in an emergency. There were not resources available on this weekend to close down the venue when the rave was taking place, without diverting all the officers in the borough force. It was reported that the MPS now has disseminated to boroughs notice of a facility to access officers from other areas and that the borough police were more likely to intervene in the future. In the event it was reported that 21 officers attended but people left and evaded statements or gave false contact details, so that none of the organizers or staff have been traced. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Barricading of rave venues against police and other emergency access

Wider context from the report

“The organizers of the unlicensed rave had not provided on-site medical assistance and had spent between 12 and 42 minutes before calling the ambulance service, when the deceased collapsed. There was inadequate ventilation for a very hot venue, and fire exits and procedure had not been regulated. The organizers had taken over an empty squatted commercial building and barricaded against those who attempted to enter, (including police, who attended and spoke earlier to a security man and then later following complaints of noise). I concluded that had the event been licensed and normal facilities and regulation in place, he would probably not have died when he did. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency access arrangements for responders; Unreliable emergency arrangements for organised public events.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to regulate fire exits at rave venues

Wider context from the report

“The organizers of the unlicensed rave had not provided on-site medical assistance and had spent between 12 and 42 minutes before calling the ambulance service, when the deceased collapsed. There was inadequate ventilation for a very hot venue, and fire exits and procedure had not been regulated. The organizers had taken over an empty squatted commercial building and barricaded against those who attempted to enter, (including police, who attended and spoke earlier to a security man and then later following complaints of noise). I concluded that had the event been licensed and normal facilities and regulation in place, he would probably not have died when he did. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to regulate fire safety procedures at rave venues

Wider context from the report

“The organizers of the unlicensed rave had not provided on-site medical assistance and had spent between 12 and 42 minutes before calling the ambulance service, when the deceased collapsed. There was inadequate ventilation for a very hot venue, and fire exits and procedure had not been regulated. The organizers had taken over an empty squatted commercial building and barricaded against those who attempted to enter, (including police, who attended and spoke earlier to a security man and then later following complaints of noise). I concluded that had the event been licensed and normal facilities and regulation in place, he would probably not have died when he did. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in calling ambulance services after a medical collapse

Wider context from the report

“The organizers of the unlicensed rave had not provided on-site medical assistance and had spent between 12 and 42 minutes before calling the ambulance service, when the deceased collapsed. There was inadequate ventilation for a very hot venue, and fire exits and procedure had not been regulated. The organizers had taken over an empty squatted commercial building and barricaded against those who attempted to enter, (including police, who attended and spoke earlier to a security man and then later following complaints of noise). I concluded that had the event been licensed and normal facilities and regulation in place, he would probably not have died when he did. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to call an ambulance promptly when emergency assistance is required.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of police power to enter squatted commercial premises to prevent illegal raves

Wider context from the report

“DS Howell specifically recommended that this report be written as the police would like the power to enter squatted commercial premises, to prevent an illegal rave being held, which was more efficient and effective than trying to intervene when it was in operation. Given the increased risks of death associated with unlicensed raves, these proposals would seem to prevent future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of police power to enter squatted commercial premises to prevent illegal raves

Wider context from the report

“Police evidence was that they had no power to enter (nor had the ambulance service) a commercial premises (as opposed to private premises) that had been squatted unless a crime had been committed or in an emergency. There were not resources available on this weekend to close down the venue when the rave was taking place, without diverting all the officers in the borough force. It was reported that the MPS now has disseminated to boroughs notice of a facility to access officers from other areas and that the borough police were more likely to intervene in the future. In the event it was reported that 21 officers attended but people left and evaded statements or gave false contact details, so that none of the organizers or staff have been traced. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate ventilation for very hot rave venues

Wider context from the report

“The organizers of the unlicensed rave had not provided on-site medical assistance and had spent between 12 and 42 minutes before calling the ambulance service, when the deceased collapsed. There was inadequate ventilation for a very hot venue, and fire exits and procedure had not been regulated. The organizers had taken over an empty squatted commercial building and barricaded against those who attempted to enter, (including police, who attended and spoke earlier to a security man and then later following complaints of noise). I concluded that had the event been licensed and normal facilities and regulation in place, he would probably not have died when he did. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Using statutory powers to prevent and stop illegal raves is an operational matter for the police.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The use of these powers is of course an operational matter for the police.”

Source location

2015-0007-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 1 · response
Published 15 January 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Police already have sufficient statutory powers to prevent and stop illegal raves.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our assessment is that the police have sufficient powers under sections 63 and 64 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (as amended by the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003) to both prevent and stop illegal raves.”

Source location

2015-0007-Response-by-Home-Office
Page 1 · response
Published 15 January 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026