PFD report

Dafydd Hûw CRAVEN-JONES and 2 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Feb 2025•Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Absence of road markings on the approach to the hump back bridge
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road markings for road-user safety
  2. Insufficient prominence of signage on the approach to the hump back bridge
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Install additional road markings on the B5012 at Pillaton as part of the planned surface treatment programme.

    Stated by Staffordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 February 2025.
  2. Action

    Develop enhanced road signage to increase the conspicuity of the humpback bridge to approaching vehicles.

    Stated by Staffordshire County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 12 February 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of road markings on the approach to the hump back bridge

Wider context from the report

“There have been two separate fatal road traffic collisions on the B5012 Cannock Road between January 2024 and May 2024. I have concerns about the prominence of signage and the absence of road markings on the approach to the hump back bridge. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road markings for road-user safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient prominence of signage on the approach to the hump back bridge

Wider context from the report

“There have been two separate fatal road traffic collisions on the B5012 Cannock Road between January 2024 and May 2024. I have concerns about the prominence of signage and the absence of road markings on the approach to the hump back bridge. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install additional road markings on the B5012 at Pillaton as part of the planned surface treatment programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Collision Hazard Reports submitted by Staffordshire Police in relation to the incidents in 2024 had already recognised the presence of warning signs on either approach alerting drivers to the presence of a hump-back bridge. The existing signs are in a good state of repair, and visibility of the signs was not obscured when the site was assessed on 06/08/2024. However, plans are currently being drawn up to increase the conspicuity of the bridge to oncoming vehicles through enhanced road signage. In addition, the B5012 at Pillaton forms part of the County Council’s 2025/26 routine surface treatment programme and additional road markings will also be installed as part of this planned work.”

Source location

Response from Staffordshire Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop enhanced road signage to increase the conspicuity of the humpback bridge to approaching vehicles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Collision Hazard Reports submitted by Staffordshire Police in relation to the incidents in 2024 had already recognised the presence of warning signs on either approach alerting drivers to the presence of a hump-back bridge. The existing signs are in a good state of repair, and visibility of the signs was not obscured when the site was assessed on 06/08/2024. However, plans are currently being drawn up to increase the conspicuity of the bridge to oncoming vehicles through enhanced road signage. In addition, the B5012 at Pillaton forms part of the County Council’s 2025/26 routine surface treatment programme and additional road markings will also be installed as part of this planned work.”

Source location

Response from Staffordshire Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026