PFD report

Andrew Jonathan WILSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 May 2017•North East Kent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of arrangements to provide peritoneal dialysis at hospitals other than the renal unit
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure access to required dialysis treatment
  2. Unavailability of equipment for peritoneal dialysis
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure access to required dialysis treatmentPart of recurring concern: Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable
  3. Failure of treating clinicians to know when peritoneal dialysis cannot be arranged at the hospital
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure access to required dialysis treatment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of arrangements to provide peritoneal dialysis at hospitals other than the renal unit

Wider context from the report

“(1) Although it was established on the balance of probability (after hearing the clinicians and an independent expert Consultant Nephrologist) that the absence of peritoneal dialysis on THIS occasion did not contribute to the death, the absence of any arrangements to provide peritoneal dialysis at hospitals other than the renal unit at Canterbury raised a concern. (2) There was an apparent absence of knowledge on the part of the treating clinicians at Maidstone Hospital that peritoneal dialysis could not be arranged either during the day or over-night at that hospital as there were no trained staff available nor was the equipment available. There were no arrangements in place to transport the equipment from the home of a patient to the hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure access to required dialysis treatment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of equipment for peritoneal dialysis

Wider context from the report

“(1) Although it was established on the balance of probability (after hearing the clinicians and an independent expert Consultant Nephrologist) that the absence of peritoneal dialysis on THIS occasion did not contribute to the death, the absence of any arrangements to provide peritoneal dialysis at hospitals other than the renal unit at Canterbury raised a concern. (2) There was an apparent absence of knowledge on the part of the treating clinicians at Maidstone Hospital that peritoneal dialysis could not be arranged either during the day or over-night at that hospital as there were no trained staff available nor was the equipment available. There were no arrangements in place to transport the equipment from the home of a patient to the hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure access to required dialysis treatment; Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of treating clinicians to know when peritoneal dialysis cannot be arranged at the hospital

Wider context from the report

“(1) Although it was established on the balance of probability (after hearing the clinicians and an independent expert Consultant Nephrologist) that the absence of peritoneal dialysis on THIS occasion did not contribute to the death, the absence of any arrangements to provide peritoneal dialysis at hospitals other than the renal unit at Canterbury raised a concern. (2) There was an apparent absence of knowledge on the part of the treating clinicians at Maidstone Hospital that peritoneal dialysis could not be arranged either during the day or over-night at that hospital as there were no trained staff available nor was the equipment available. There were no arrangements in place to transport the equipment from the home of a patient to the hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure access to required dialysis treatment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of trained staff to provide peritoneal dialysis

Wider context from the report

“(1) Although it was established on the balance of probability (after hearing the clinicians and an independent expert Consultant Nephrologist) that the absence of peritoneal dialysis on THIS occasion did not contribute to the death, the absence of any arrangements to provide peritoneal dialysis at hospitals other than the renal unit at Canterbury raised a concern. (2) There was an apparent absence of knowledge on the part of the treating clinicians at Maidstone Hospital that peritoneal dialysis could not be arranged either during the day or over-night at that hospital as there were no trained staff available nor was the equipment available. There were no arrangements in place to transport the equipment from the home of a patient to the hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure access to required dialysis treatment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of arrangements to transport peritoneal dialysis equipment from a patient's home to hospital

Wider context from the report

“(1) Although it was established on the balance of probability (after hearing the clinicians and an independent expert Consultant Nephrologist) that the absence of peritoneal dialysis on THIS occasion did not contribute to the death, the absence of any arrangements to provide peritoneal dialysis at hospitals other than the renal unit at Canterbury raised a concern. (2) There was an apparent absence of knowledge on the part of the treating clinicians at Maidstone Hospital that peritoneal dialysis could not be arranged either during the day or over-night at that hospital as there were no trained staff available nor was the equipment available. There were no arrangements in place to transport the equipment from the home of a patient to the hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure access to required dialysis treatment.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.