PFD report

Mitica Marin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Mar 2020•East London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
5

Named on the report

Responses found
5

Of 5 recipients

Stated actions
13

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to review the defibrillator during resuscitation
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable defibrillator operation during resuscitation
  2. LP15 defibrillator defaulting to manual mode
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable defibrillator operation during resuscitation
  3. Failure to activate the LP15 defibrillator in automatic mode
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable defibrillator operation during resuscitation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Action

    Review resuscitation guidance on manual versus automatic defibrillation for the first cardiac arrest shock.

    Stated by Association of Ambulance Chief ExecutivesStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 March 2020.
  2. Action

    Issue revised guidance permitting solo responders to use automatic defibrillator mode until additional help arrives.

    Stated by Association of Ambulance Chief ExecutivesStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 March 2020.
  3. Action

    Deliver human-factors training covering communication, active listening, speaking up and decision-making bandwidth to tutors and relevant clinical staff.

    Stated by London Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 March 2020.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.10

  1. Position

    Automatic defibrillator start-up is not considered safer; manual defibrillation is preferred for advanced life support because it may improve survival outcomes.

    Stated by Resuscitation Council UKDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review the defibrillator during resuscitation

Wider context from the report

“The LAS serious incident investigation identified a 4-minute delay between LP15 defibrillator pads being placed on Mr Marin’s chest and the administration of the first shock. During this period Mr Marin’s heart was in a shockable rhythm. Paramedic A accepted that they had not reviewed the defibrillator as they were distracted by events. Paramedic A did not activate the defibrillator in “automatic” mode. Had this setting been applied, any shockable rhythm would have been detected and an alert would have prompted the paramedic to shock to the patient. This is not an isolated incident, the LAS conceded that it had undertaken a review of similar cases of delayed defibrillation. The review found that a factor was that the LP15 defibrillator model, defaults to manual mode requiring the user to switch to automatic mode before use. 2 studies cited by the LAS indicated that every minute a patient is delayed effective resuscitation; their prospects of survival diminishes by between 10-22%. The LAS have introduced remedial measures to prevent such actions occurring, incorporating; training on the use of the LP15, labelling on units and the issuing of revised guidance. If the LP15 defaulted to automatic mode or on start-up required, the choice of manual or automatic mode it is possible that such delays could be avoided. I understand that procurement decisions regarding the future supply of defibrillators are imminent. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable defibrillator operation during resuscitation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

LP15 defibrillator defaulting to manual mode

Wider context from the report

“The LAS serious incident investigation identified a 4-minute delay between LP15 defibrillator pads being placed on Mr Marin’s chest and the administration of the first shock. During this period Mr Marin’s heart was in a shockable rhythm. Paramedic A accepted that they had not reviewed the defibrillator as they were distracted by events. Paramedic A did not activate the defibrillator in “automatic” mode. Had this setting been applied, any shockable rhythm would have been detected and an alert would have prompted the paramedic to shock to the patient. This is not an isolated incident, the LAS conceded that it had undertaken a review of similar cases of delayed defibrillation. The review found that a factor was that the LP15 defibrillator model, defaults to manual mode requiring the user to switch to automatic mode before use. 2 studies cited by the LAS indicated that every minute a patient is delayed effective resuscitation; their prospects of survival diminishes by between 10-22%. The LAS have introduced remedial measures to prevent such actions occurring, incorporating; training on the use of the LP15, labelling on units and the issuing of revised guidance. If the LP15 defaulted to automatic mode or on start-up required, the choice of manual or automatic mode it is possible that such delays could be avoided. I understand that procurement decisions regarding the future supply of defibrillators are imminent. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable defibrillator operation during resuscitation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to activate the LP15 defibrillator in automatic mode

Wider context from the report

“The LAS serious incident investigation identified a 4-minute delay between LP15 defibrillator pads being placed on Mr Marin’s chest and the administration of the first shock. During this period Mr Marin’s heart was in a shockable rhythm. Paramedic A accepted that they had not reviewed the defibrillator as they were distracted by events. Paramedic A did not activate the defibrillator in “automatic” mode. Had this setting been applied, any shockable rhythm would have been detected and an alert would have prompted the paramedic to shock to the patient. This is not an isolated incident, the LAS conceded that it had undertaken a review of similar cases of delayed defibrillation. The review found that a factor was that the LP15 defibrillator model, defaults to manual mode requiring the user to switch to automatic mode before use. 2 studies cited by the LAS indicated that every minute a patient is delayed effective resuscitation; their prospects of survival diminishes by between 10-22%. The LAS have introduced remedial measures to prevent such actions occurring, incorporating; training on the use of the LP15, labelling on units and the issuing of revised guidance. If the LP15 defaulted to automatic mode or on start-up required, the choice of manual or automatic mode it is possible that such delays could be avoided. I understand that procurement decisions regarding the future supply of defibrillators are imminent. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable defibrillator operation during resuscitation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review resuscitation guidance on manual versus automatic defibrillation for the first cardiac arrest shock.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Last year we undertook an extensive review of the resuscitation sections of our clinical practice guidelines. We considered the issue of using manual or automatic mode for delivering the first shock in a cardiac arrest situation and we issued our revised guidance to the UK ambulance services in June 2019. The section of our guidance pertaining to manual or automatic mode is detailed below:”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-Association-of-Ambulance-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue revised guidance permitting solo responders to use automatic defibrillator mode until additional help arrives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Last year we undertook an extensive review of the resuscitation sections of our clinical practice guidelines. We considered the issue of using manual or automatic mode for delivering the first shock in a cardiac arrest situation and we issued our revised guidance to the UK ambulance services in June 2019. The section of our guidance pertaining to manual or automatic mode is detailed below:”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-Association-of-Ambulance-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver human-factors training covering communication, active listening, speaking up and decision-making bandwidth to tutors and relevant clinical staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A further six staff are due to undertake the ‘Train the Trainer’ program. We also have a full day of training in areas specific to human factors (communication, active listening, speaking up as part of a team, and how bandwidth impacts decisions and communications) which we hope to be in a position to roll out in July/August”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review delayed-defibrillation cases and complete thematic analysis to identify contributory factors and mitigation actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It was also recognised that the delay in defibrillation of Mr Marin was not an isolated incident for the Trust. In order to address incidents of delayed defibrillation, the LAS undertook a review of similar cases and completed a thematic analysis report in December 2019. The updated Action Plan from this report is attached for your reference.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue reviewing defibrillator procurement options through clinical-equipment tender processes and encourage manufacturers to develop automatic AED-mode functionality.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Efforts are being made to investigate devices which have in-built technology to potentially bypass the need for a clinician to have to remember to put the device in AED mode (for example, a device that would automatically switch the device to AED mode when defibrillator pads were applied). At this point in time, we have not located a specific device on the market with this functionality which is also sufficiently robust for the ambulance market.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue clinical guidance mandating initial AED-mode use on LP15 defibrillators during cardiac arrests.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Paramedic A cited the training actions the LAS had undertaken around the fundamental importance of prompt defibrillation, where clinically indicated. In addition to this, the LAS has produced clinical update material to mandate that on all cardiac arrests the LP15 defibrillator should initially be placed in AED mode.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train clinical education and standard tutors in human factors so they can deliver the content through the core-skills refresher programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further to the evidence you heard in respect of training, in addition the LAS is continuing to progress ‘human factors training’ to focus on optimising staff performance through better understanding of behavioural interactions with each other and the environment. This is especially pertinent for operational staff who deal with chaotic, emotional scenes and where no two scenes are the same.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Place AED-mode reminder stickers on LP15 defibrillators and communicate the change through station management, bulletins and the intranet.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From August 2019 large yellow indicators (stickers) with ‘push analyse for AED mode’ were placed on LP15 defibrillators to act as an alert reminder to users to switch the machine into AED mode. This was communicated to staff via station management as well an update in our Routine Information Bulletin (RIB) which is emailed to all staff and also available on the intranet. We have also sought to ensure that devices used in training reflect this change.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate AED-mode use and cardiac-arrest priority training into mandatory quarterly core-skills refresher training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This has also been incorporated this into the core skills refresher (CSR) training which all clinical staff undergo in the LAS.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Automatic defibrillator start-up is not considered safer; manual defibrillation is preferred for advanced life support because it may improve survival outcomes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although defibrillators can be set to start up in either automatic or manual mode, the latter is preferred. This is because when used correctly, studies have shown that a manual mode results in greater chance of return of spontaneous circulation and subsequent survival to hospital discharge, compared with an automatic mode. Manual defibrillation is therefore recommended for advanced life support, as delivered by ambulance paramedics.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-Resusciation-Council-UK-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deciding or recommending which defibrillator ambulance services should purchase is outside the organisation’s responsibility as a membership organisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are aware that there are a number of types of defibrillators in use in UK ambulance service, however, it is not our responsibility as a membership organisation to decide or recommend which device an ambulance service should purchase.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-Association-of-Ambulance-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The concerns inaccurately reflect LP15 capabilities because it can be configured to power on in either automatic or manual defibrillation mode.

Verbatim wording from the response

“After consultation with the manufacturer of the LP15 device, I can advise that the LP15 monitor/defibrillator is designed with the ability to be configured to power on in either automatic or manual defibrillation mode based on the clinical protocols of the health system. Accordingly, I respectfully submit that the Coroner’s Concerns listed at Section 5 of the Report do not accurately reflect the capabilities of the LP15 device.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-Stryker-Corporation-Physio-Control-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing LP15 configuration capability is considered sufficient, so no action is proposed in relation to the report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Due to the existing capability of the LP15 to be configured to power on in either automatic or manual defibrillation mode, Stryker does not propose to take any action in relation to the Report.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-Stryker-Corporation-Physio-Control-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Professional organisations should determine appropriate defibrillator default settings according to local protocols, intended use and available guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Professional organisations are best placed to determine the appropriate default settings according to their local protocols and intended use, taking into account available guidance.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-Dept.-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Changing the defibrillator default to AED mode is not practical for everyday use because the device also functions as a clinical monitoring tool.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that the London Ambulance Service has considered if changing the default setting of the LIFEPAK 15 to AED mode could improve clinical outcomes. The London Ambulance Service has decided, for reasons set out in its response to your report, that this is not practical for every-day use given the device’s functionality as both a clinical monitoring tool and defibrillator.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-Dept.-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The device's current manual default mode is considered acceptable based on the ambulance service's rationale, subject to monitoring for continuing delays.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, my officials have drawn this matter to the attention of the MHRA and also Professor ████████, the National Clinical Director for Heart Disease at NHSEI. Following discussion with clinical colleagues, Professor ████████ has advised that the current default mode of the device being manual, rather than automatic, is acceptable having considered the rationale of the London Ambulance Service deliberations on this matter. Professor ████████ has recommended that, if further monitoring and analysis of data shows continuing evidence of delays, consideration should be given to changing the default setting of the device and this advice has been shared with the London Ambulance Service.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-Dept.-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Future defibrillator procurement is a matter for individual ambulance services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to future procurement of defibrillators, this is a matter for individual ambulance services. I am advised that the London Ambulance Service is looking to source devices that have in-built technology to negate the need for the user to actively select the mode of operation. I understand that such a device has not been located but that, where it can, the London Ambulance Service is encouraging manufacturers to consider this functional requirement for future models.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-Dept.-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Setting LP15 defibrillators to AED mode by default was considered impractical because of operational use and potential unintended consequences.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our Clinical Practice Development Manager gave evidence setting out that it was technically possible for the LP15 defibrillator to be set to AED mode as default, which would require the user to actively have to switch it off when managing a patient who did not require defibrillation. He went on to explain that this option has been considered by the Trust’s medical directorate but the evidence gathered in consideration of the best option to mitigate against clinicians being distracted and/or overwhelmed managing multiple tasks at a busy scene, indicates that to set the LP15 defibrillator to AED mode as default was not overtly practical for a day to day use.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No sufficiently robust defibrillator with automatic AED-mode functionality has been found for ambulance use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your report also requests that I address the matter of procurement decisions regarding the future supply of defibrillators.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Request the AACE to communicate the report’s concerns to ambulance services in England.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 March 2020.
  2. 2

    Download and analyse LP15 defibrillator data to identify delayed defibrillation and improve cardiac-arrest care.

    Stated by London Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 March 2020.
  3. 3

    Continue work arising from the thematic analysis to mitigate delayed defibrillation risks.

    Stated by London Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 March 2020.
  4. 4

    Conduct a further review to assess thematic-analysis actions and update findings using continuing evidence.

    Stated by London Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 March 2020.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    A fixed timescale for reviewing thematic-analysis actions could not be provided because of COVID-19 pressures and unprecedented demand.

    Stated by London Ambulance Service NHS TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request the AACE to communicate the report’s concerns to ambulance services in England.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the absence of such a design, it is of course important that ambulance services using devices such as the LIFEPAK 15 look to mitigate the risk of future incidents of delayed defibrillation and my officials have asked the AACE to make the concerns in your report known to ambulance services in England. I note the measures taken by the London Ambulance Service, including updated guidance to staff on managing cardiac arrest, human factors training and focused training for solo first responders.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-Dept.-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Download and analyse LP15 defibrillator data to identify delayed defibrillation and improve cardiac-arrest care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is worth noting that the LAS aim to download data from defibrillators and analyse this to improve the care of patients in cardiac arrest. It is through this practice that the LAS have often been able to detect any delay in defibrillation. We would caution any comparison of LAS practice against organisation who do not undertake such audits.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue work arising from the thematic analysis to mitigate delayed defibrillation risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You heard live evidence from two LAS staff, the Clinical Practice Development Manager, Critical Care, who provided a clinical opinion and also spoke in part to the thematic analysis. You also heard from a Quality, Governance and Assurance Manager who provided evidence on the serious incident investigation, findings, individual reflection and learning and wider Trust learning as well as speaking on the details of the thematic analysis, action plan to continue work to mitigate the risks of not only the circumstances that gave rise to the delay when treating Mr Marin, but taking into account other contributory factors.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a further review to assess thematic-analysis actions and update findings using continuing evidence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is a further review planned to build on the finding of this thematic analysis and to monitor the effectiveness of the actions that were identified and put into practice. We will be aiming to update our findings based on the continuing evidence we are collating. At this point in time we are unable to commit to a fixed timescale for this, in light of the severe pressures the Trust is currently managing due to the unprecedented demand, in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic response, which will certainly be ongoing for some time.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A fixed timescale for reviewing thematic-analysis actions could not be provided because of COVID-19 pressures and unprecedented demand.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is a further review planned to build on the finding of this thematic analysis and to monitor the effectiveness of the actions that were identified and put into practice. We will be aiming to update our findings based on the continuing evidence we are collating. At this point in time we are unable to commit to a fixed timescale for this, in light of the severe pressures the Trust is currently managing due to the unprecedented demand, in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic response, which will certainly be ongoing for some time.”

Source location

2020-0066-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 27 March 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
5/5

Data last updated 7 September 2026