PFD report

Joyce Marchant · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Dec 2019•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to provide GPs with timely and reliable blood-results and follow-up information
  2. Shortage of interventional radiologists delaying access to drainage procedures
  3. Lack of a clear communication strategy and treatment plan between DGHs and tertiary centres
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care servicesPart of recurring concern: Inadequate coordination between hospitals during patient care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide GPs with timely and reliable blood-results and follow-up information

Wider context from the report

“2. The inquest heard that the Manchester Royal Infirmary use the postal system to provide GPs with information about blood results/follow up information. Faxes are no longer used due to GDPR. The trust propose to move to an email system for notifying GPs recognising that the use of the postal system carries delay and risk of information not reaching the GP(7% was the figure given to the inquest). Their IT system at this time is not capable of this information transfer and the information was that it would be about another 2-3 years before that was achieved. In the interim they would continue to use the postal system; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Shortage of interventional radiologists delaying access to drainage procedures

Wider context from the report

“1. During the course of the Inquest the evidence given was that the delay in offering the drainage procedure was attributable to a shortage of interventional radiologists which meant that the Trust could not accommodate the need for a drainage procedure until 31st May. There was greater availability at tertiary centres but transfers to tertiary centre could take time and not be practicable. The inquest heard that if she had been at the tertiary centre when the abscess was identified she would probably have had the drainage procedure almost straight away; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear communication strategy and treatment plan between DGHs and tertiary centres

Wider context from the report

“3. The MRI was the treating centre for Mrs Marchant’s underlying medical problems which led to her deterioration. However there was no evidence of a clear communication strategy or treatment plan involving the DGH and Tertiary Centre. This was attributed in part to the sheer volume of demand on tertiary centres and the extent of support they can provide to DGHs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services; Inadequate coordination between hospitals during patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays and impracticability in transferring patients to tertiary centres for drainage procedures

Wider context from the report

“1. During the course of the Inquest the evidence given was that the delay in offering the drainage procedure was attributable to a shortage of interventional radiologists which meant that the Trust could not accommodate the need for a drainage procedure until 31st May. There was greater availability at tertiary centres but transfers to tertiary centre could take time and not be practicable. The inquest heard that if she had been at the tertiary centre when the abscess was identified she would probably have had the drainage procedure almost straight away; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely access to clinically required chest drainage.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.