Douglas Birch · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Jul 2015•Mid Kent and Medway

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to read Prison Service Orders and Instructions
  2. Failure to receive Prison Service Orders and Instructions
  3. Failure to elicit a prisoner response upon cell unlocking

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency Group

    Issue a local welfare-check procedure requiring staff and supervising officers to sign confirmation after each check.

  2. National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency Group

    Compile and publish an intranet learning bulletin for all prison staff on the importance of welfare checks.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency Group

    Governors are responsible for bringing relevant instructions to staff and reflecting them in local policies and procedures.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency Group

    It is not reasonable to expect all prison staff to read every Prison Service Order or Instruction.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to read Prison Service Orders and Instructions

Wider context from the report

“(2) Prison officers were either not receiving Prison Service Orders and Instructions or if they did receive them, did not read them ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to receive Prison Service Orders and Instructions

Wider context from the report

“(2) Prison officers were either not receiving Prison Service Orders and Instructions or if they did receive them, did not read them ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to elicit a prisoner response upon cell unlocking

Wider context from the report

“(1) Prison officers were either not aware of PSI 75/2011 requiring that officers should elicit a response from the prisoner upon unlocking a cell or were aware but did not act in accordance with the order especially where they assumed the prisoner was asleep ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a local welfare-check procedure requiring staff and supervising officers to sign confirmation after each check.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to your concerns, the attached notice to staff was issued at HMP Swaleside on 10 August 2015. It sets out the local procedure for ensuring compliance with the mandatory requirement in PSI 75/2011 to which you refer, and requires staff and a supervising officer to sign to confirm that the welfare checks have taken place on each occasion.”

Source location

2015-0274-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 13 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Compile and publish an intranet learning bulletin for all prison staff on the importance of welfare checks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to ensure that the importance of welfare checks is better understood across the prison estate, NOMS is compiling a learning bulletin that will be published for the attention of all staff on our intranet by the end of September.”

Source location

2015-0274-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 13 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Governors are responsible for bringing relevant instructions to staff and reflecting them in local policies and procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is not reasonable to expect all prison staff to read all Prison Service Orders and Instructions. Rather, it is the responsibility of the Governor of each prison establishment to bring relevant instructions to the attention of staff and to ensure that they are reflected in local policies and procedures.”

Source location

2015-0274-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 13 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

It is not reasonable to expect all prison staff to read every Prison Service Order or Instruction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is not reasonable to expect all prison staff to read all Prison Service Orders and Instructions. Rather, it is the responsibility of the Governor of each prison establishment to bring relevant instructions to the attention of staff and to ensure that they are reflected in local policies and procedures.”

Source location

2015-0274-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 13 July 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026