PFD report

Darren Adams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Apr 2021•South Yorkshire (Eastern)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Confusing definitions of post-death signs in CPR decision-making guidance
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable guidance for decisions to stop or withhold resuscitation
  2. Insufficient nursing staff understanding of identifying hypostasis and rigor mortis
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise hypostasis and rigor mortis
  3. Insufficient life support training coverage of hypostasis and rigor mortis identification
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise hypostasis and rigor mortisPart of recurring concern: Inadequate staff competence to provide first aid
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Share the response with the guidance authors and the RCUK Community and Ambulance Resuscitation committee.

    Stated by Resuscitation Council UKStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 May 2021.
  2. Action

    Introduce mandatory ILS teaching on hypostasis, lividity and rigor mortis, including mandatory decision-making scenarios, through the revised curriculum from July 2021.

    Stated by Practice Plus GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 May 2021.
  3. Action

    Teach clinical staff how to diagnose death.

    Stated by Practice Plus GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 May 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Detailed training in recognising rigor mortis and hypostasis falls outside the scope of RCUK training courses.

    Stated by Resuscitation Council UKOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Confusing definitions of post-death signs in CPR decision-making guidance

Wider context from the report

“4. It was seen during the evidence that definitions in Annex A of the document “Guidance to support the decision-making process of when not to perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in prisons and immigration removal centre (IRC)” could be confusing, for example the word “mottling” was interpreted by different people in different ways (both lay and medical). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable guidance for decisions to stop or withhold resuscitation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient nursing staff understanding of identifying hypostasis and rigor mortis

Wider context from the report

“1. The Nursing Staff misdiagnosed hypostasis. It was apparent in evidence that they did not have a sufficient understanding of the process and how to identify it. 2. The Nursing Staff misdiagnosed rigor mortis. It was apparent in evidence that they did not have a sufficient understanding of the process and how to identify it. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise hypostasis and rigor mortis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient life support training coverage of hypostasis and rigor mortis identification

Wider context from the report

“3. Management of the nurses accepted in evidence that more focus on the identification of those conditions should have been covered in better depth during the nurse’s life support training. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise hypostasis and rigor mortis; Inadequate staff competence to provide first aid.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the response with the guidance authors and the RCUK Community and Ambulance Resuscitation committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“11. Finally, RCUK has shared this response with:”

Source location

2021-0125-Response-from-Resuscitation-Council-UK_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce mandatory ILS teaching on hypostasis, lividity and rigor mortis, including mandatory decision-making scenarios, through the revised curriculum from July 2021.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Practice Plus Group mandates annual Intermediate Life Support Training (ILS) for all clinical staff in recognition of their critical role in providing pre hospital life support. Non clinical staff are trained in Basic Life Support and agency staff are required to have undertaken ILS training and can access the training provided by Practice Plus Group. The curriculum for PPG’s ILS training has been adapted by our training provider to include prison specific scenarios. The training is delivered by Resuscitation Council accredited trainers. Following this request, the training provider has spoken to staff who have been involved in resuscitation decision-making scenarios to hear their experiences and understand the issues that are faced, including the challenges of diagnosing hypostasis. Our training provider has amended the content of the previously provided ILS course to include:”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 2 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Teach clinical staff how to diagnose death.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: This guidance was issued by the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), Royal College of Nursing (RCN) and the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) in March 2016. Therefore, the terminology sits outside the control of Practice Plus Group. For Practice Plus Group we will:”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 3 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Teach staff the practical meaning of terminology used in Resuscitation Council UK guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: This guidance was issued by the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), Royal College of Nursing (RCN) and the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) in March 2016. Therefore, the terminology sits outside the control of Practice Plus Group. For Practice Plus Group we will:”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 3 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate revisions to the relevant guidance into Practice Plus Group training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: This guidance was issued by the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), Royal College of Nursing (RCN) and the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) in March 2016. Therefore, the terminology sits outside the control of Practice Plus Group. For Practice Plus Group we will:”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 3 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Detailed training in recognising rigor mortis and hypostasis falls outside the scope of RCUK training courses.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6. Training and clinical experience are required to be able to reliably diagnose irreversible death based on the presence of rigor mortis and hypostasis. Detailed training in the recognition of rigor mortis and hypostasis is outside the scope of RCUK training courses.”

Source location

2021-0125-Response-from-Resuscitation-Council-UK_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Changing the terminology in the prison CPR guidance is outside the respondent’s control.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: This guidance was issued by the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), Royal College of Nursing (RCN) and the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) in March 2016. Therefore, the terminology sits outside the control of Practice Plus Group. For Practice Plus Group we will:”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 3 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Record training attendance and emergency-scenario simulation events in the Learning Management System to monitor compliance with training requirements.

    Stated by Practice Plus GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 May 2021.
  2. 2

    Raise the terminology concerns identified during the inquest with NHS England by correspondence.

    Stated by Practice Plus GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 May 2021.
  3. 3

    Roll out supplementary on-site simulation education days for clinical staff across Practice Plus Group sites, prioritising sites with identified issues and scheduling an event at HMP Lindholme.

    Stated by Practice Plus GroupStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 4 May 2021.
  4. 4

    Implement lessons learned from the incident across Practice Plus Group services, not only at HMP Lindholme.

    Stated by Practice Plus GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 May 2021.
  5. 5

    Provide annual Intermediate Life Support training to clinical staff, with Basic Life Support training for non-clinical staff and ILS access requirements for agency staff.

    Stated by Practice Plus GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 May 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Record training attendance and emergency-scenario simulation events in the Learning Management System to monitor compliance with training requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Records of training attendance and emergency scenario simulation events are kept on our Learning Management System to provide assurance of compliance with PPG requirements.”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 2 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Raise the terminology concerns identified during the inquest with NHS England by correspondence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: This guidance was issued by the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), Royal College of Nursing (RCN) and the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) in March 2016. Therefore, the terminology sits outside the control of Practice Plus Group. For Practice Plus Group we will:”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 3 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out supplementary on-site simulation education days for clinical staff across Practice Plus Group sites, prioritising sites with identified issues and scheduling an event at HMP Lindholme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This change in curriculum has been agreed will take effect from July 2021. Supplementary, additional education days have been developed for on-site training of clinical staff. These include a range of resuscitation scenarios to build staff confidence and encourage participation in group learning exercises; this is in addition to the ILS training provided. These simulation days are in the process of being rolled out across PPG’s sites, prioritising those where issues have been identified. A simulation training event at HMP Lindholme is being scheduled for the end of September 2021.”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 2 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement lessons learned from the incident across Practice Plus Group services, not only at HMP Lindholme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Practice Plus Group are committed to providing a high quality healthcare service at HMP Lindholme and to ensuring that those detained there are as safe as possible and receive the best quality care. Practice Plus Group is deeply sorry that Mr Adams died while receiving care from our service and we will ensure that the lessons learnt are not just implemented at HMP Lindholme but across Practice Plus Group’s services.”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 3 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide annual Intermediate Life Support training to clinical staff, with Basic Life Support training for non-clinical staff and ILS access requirements for agency staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Practice Plus Group mandates annual Intermediate Life Support Training (ILS) for all clinical staff in recognition of their critical role in providing pre hospital life support. Non clinical staff are trained in Basic Life Support and agency staff are required to have undertaken ILS training and can access the training provided by Practice Plus Group. The curriculum for PPG’s ILS training has been adapted by our training provider to include prison specific scenarios. The training is delivered by Resuscitation Council accredited trainers. Following this request, the training provider has spoken to staff who have been involved in resuscitation decision-making scenarios to hear their experiences and understand the issues that are faced, including the challenges of diagnosing hypostasis. Our training provider has amended the content of the previously provided ILS course to include:”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 2 · response
Published 4 May 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026