PFD report

Mrs Withers · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Oct 2015•Northamptonshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Inadequate policy for calling back a lifeline or third party when the patient cannot receive calls
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable welfare-call arrangements when patients cannot receive calls
  2. Delays in ambulance staff handover to hospital
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover
  3. Inadequate policy or procedure for saving essential patient medical history in ambulance service electronic data systems
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate policy for calling back a lifeline or third party when the patient cannot receive calls

Wider context from the report

“2) The policy in relation to calling back a life line/third party where the patient is unable to receive calls. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable welfare-call arrangements when patients cannot receive calls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in ambulance staff handover to hospital

Wider context from the report

“5) The policy and protocol in relation to hand over times between East Midlands Service paramedics and Kettering General Hospital Accident and Emergency staff (the concern being the apparent loss of time by ambulance staff during the handover of patient to hospital.) ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate policy or procedure for saving essential patient medical history in ambulance service electronic data systems

Wider context from the report

“3) The policy/procedure in relation to saving essential patient medical history in the ambulance service electronic data systems. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate policy on staff abstraction tolerance and levels

Wider context from the report

“4) The policy in relation to staff abstraction tolerance and levels. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate policy for obtaining patient medical history during the first 999 call

Wider context from the report

“1) The policy in relation to obtaining a patient’s medical history during the first 999 call, reporting an incident. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.