PFD report

Phyllis Margaret LETCHER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Aug 2018•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of key fob access control through the stairgate
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access controls for residential accommodation
  2. Lack of live CCTV monitoring of the staircase and other communal areas
  3. Lack of an alarm when the stairgate is left open
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Consider extending existing CCTV coverage to all stairwell levels for retrospective investigation of future falls.

    Stated by Anson Care Services LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 October 2018.
  2. Action

    Investigate whether an audible alarm can identify an open stair gate to carers throughout the home.

    Stated by Anson Care Services LimitedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 October 2018.
  3. Action

    Consider the safety consequences and feasibility of adding key-fob access controls to stair gates.

    Stated by Anson Care Services LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 October 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Position

    Live CCTV monitoring is not considered necessary or proportionate because it would impose continuous surveillance and restrict residents’ privacy and liberty.

    Stated by Anson Care Services LimitedNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of key fob access control through the stairgate

Wider context from the report

“(2) The absence of a key fob access through the stairgate. The court heard evidence that whilst access from the residential quarters is controlled by key fob there is no such control of access to the staircase. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access controls for residential accommodation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of live CCTV monitoring of the staircase and other communal areas

Wider context from the report

“(1) The absence of live CCTV monitoring of the staircase and other communal areas. The court heard evidence that whilst there is CCTV recording of the corridors it is not by way of a live monitored feed and does not cover the staircase. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of an alarm when the stairgate is left open

Wider context from the report

“(3) The absence of an alarm in the event that the stairgate is left open. The court heard evidence that the stairgate has on occasions been left open allowing unrestricted access to the staircase. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider extending existing CCTV coverage to all stairwell levels for retrospective investigation of future falls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Live CCTV at all times is also impractical because it would massively increase the costs of care home placements to all parties, including individuals, the local government and NHS, while still not necessarily preventing all accidents. I do however plan to see whether the CCTV coverage in place already (not live) can be extended to cover all levels of the stairwell so that it can be seen retrospectively exactly what might have led up to any future falls if this should happen (in communal areas) so that any specific individual cause (or causes) could be more accurately identified and appropriately minimised if possible for the future. There is current and ongoing huge national debate about the invasion of privacy with regard to the use of CCTV monitoring in care homes, and no clear conclusions are yet available.”

Source location

2018-0276-Response-by-Anson-Care-Services-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 30 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Investigate whether an audible alarm can identify an open stair gate to carers throughout the home.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. We are looking into whether it is possible to have an alarm which is audible to carers in and around all areas of the home, and which identifies which gate is open. In the case of Mrs Letcher, access was only obtained by her and a couple of other residents who had been assessed as capable of holding a fob, and so this would not have prevented her from having access herself.”

Source location

2018-0276-Response-by-Anson-Care-Services-Limited
Page 6 · response
Published 30 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider the safety consequences and feasibility of adding key-fob access controls to stair gates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. We have considered your concern that we should add key fob access to the stair gates. We have then considered the consequences if key fob access had been in place at the time of Mrs Letcher’s admission. Since she had the required mental capacity to make her own decisions in relation to mobility and transfers, it is highly likely that we would have needed to provide her with a fob in order to prevent an unlawful restriction on her movements and”

Source location

2018-0276-Response-by-Anson-Care-Services-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 30 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Live CCTV monitoring is not considered necessary or proportionate because it would impose continuous surveillance and restrict residents’ privacy and liberty.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The fall was not seen, although it was heard, and staff attended immediately. It is not our view that live CCTV monitoring could have prevented this unless all access to the stairwell was prevented for all service users. This is something that ████████ (DoLS Service Manager, Cornwall County Council) has said should be ‘robustly resisted’. Having live CCTV coverage would significantly increase the restrictions put on all service users, and would not be considered ‘necessary or proportionate’ and nor would it respect service users’ rights to privacy and not to be ‘watched’ at all times; it would take away dignity for those who would therefore be under constant surveillance. If people did not agree to it, it would be a breach of their right to be free from constant supervision and control.”

Source location

2018-0276-Response-by-Anson-Care-Services-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 30 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Live CCTV monitoring is considered impractical because its substantial costs would increase care placement costs without necessarily preventing accidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Live CCTV at all times is also impractical because it would massively increase the costs of care home placements to all parties, including individuals, the local government and NHS, while still not necessarily preventing all accidents. I do however plan to see whether the CCTV coverage in place already (not live) can be extended to cover all levels of the stairwell so that it can be seen retrospectively exactly what might have led up to any future falls if this should happen (in communal areas) so that any specific individual cause (or causes) could be more accurately identified and appropriately minimised if possible for the future. There is current and ongoing huge national debate about the invasion of privacy with regard to the use of CCTV monitoring in care homes, and no clear conclusions are yet available.”

Source location

2018-0276-Response-by-Anson-Care-Services-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 30 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Key-fob stair access is constrained by the need for extensive fire-system cabling and risks from automatic release or displaced falls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is the further practical complication that such fobs would need to be linked to the fire alarm system so that they release automatically in the event of a fire. This would require extensive additional fire cabling supply to each level. Automatic release of fire escape routes presents its own challenges and risks for people with dementia – especially as the fire alarms can often be ‘set off’ by service users with dementia.”

Source location

2018-0276-Response-by-Anson-Care-Services-Limited
Page 6 · response
Published 30 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

In-person staff presence is considered more useful than remote CCTV because staff can intervene directly when residents experience difficulty.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While I can see the benefit of being able to review CCTV footage to ascertain how falls have occurred after the fact, this particular incident probably would not have been preventable if watched by staff from afar. Staffing in care homes is constrained by funding. In my view, it is more useful to have our staff circulating and interacting with our residents so that they can help to prevent accidents in person than to watch people remotely. Staff often provide support when a person appears to be ‘wobbly’ or in difficulty. Footage from another room may help to pinpoint what happened but having staff available in person allows them to intercede more effectively at the point when a person experiences difficulty.”

Source location

2018-0276-Response-by-Anson-Care-Services-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 30 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Key-fob access would probably not have prevented the fall because the resident would have been entitled to receive a fob and retain stair access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. We have considered your concern that we should add key fob access to the stair gates. We have then considered the consequences if key fob access had been in place at the time of Mrs Letcher’s admission. Since she had the required mental capacity to make her own decisions in relation to mobility and transfers, it is highly likely that we would have needed to provide her with a fob in order to prevent an unlawful restriction on her movements and”

Source location

2018-0276-Response-by-Anson-Care-Services-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 30 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A gate-open alarm would not have prevented this fall because the resident was assessed as capable of holding a fob and accessing the stairs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. We are looking into whether it is possible to have an alarm which is audible to carers in and around all areas of the home, and which identifies which gate is open. In the case of Mrs Letcher, access was only obtained by her and a couple of other residents who had been assessed as capable of holding a fob, and so this would not have prevented her from having access herself.”

Source location

2018-0276-Response-by-Anson-Care-Services-Limited
Page 6 · response
Published 30 October 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Review care arrangements and processes with the Cornwall Council DoLS Service Manager.

    Stated by Anson Care Services LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 October 2018.
  2. 2

    Complete service-user risk and mental-capacity assessments, applying least-restrictive measures based on identified risks and rights.

    Stated by Anson Care Services LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 October 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review care arrangements and processes with the Cornwall Council DoLS Service Manager.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The three matters of concern you have raised could all impose restrictions on people’s freedom of movement and freedom not to be subject to continuous supervision and control. We are obliged to act in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (the “MCA”) so we invited ████████ Service Manager for Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards, Cornwall Council, to visit Crossroads House in order to seek his expertise and advice regarding the arrangements we already have in place, and to review our processes. We are bound to consider what would be deemed unlawful restrictions to the liberties of those in our care, and to carry out risk assessments for those affected. You have seen copies of the risk assessments carried out in respect of Mrs Letcher.”

Source location

2018-0276-Response-by-Anson-Care-Services-Limited
Page 1 · response
Published 30 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete service-user risk and mental-capacity assessments, applying least-restrictive measures based on identified risks and rights.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At Crossroads House risk assessments for likely risks are completed for all service users at the time of admission, and again after a period of observation and familiarisation (and in the future as necessary if or when needs change). Measures are taken in the best interests of the person at that time according to identified risks.”

Source location

2018-0276-Response-by-Anson-Care-Services-Limited
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026