PFD report

James Ferris Baxter · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Apr 2024•Berkshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of provision on Form D4 for recent HbA1c and cholesterol results
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete cardiovascular risk information for clinical assessment and investigation
  2. Unavailability of cardiac stress testing for asymptomatic individuals
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to clinically required cardiology tests
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The DVLA can act only on information received from licence holders or healthcare professionals about known medical conditions.

    Stated by Department for TransportUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of provision on Form D4 for recent HbA1c and cholesterol results

Wider context from the report

“4) I received evidence that DVLA does commission functional cardiac stress testing for those with known cardiovascular disease, or those with symptoms suspected to be related to cardiac disease but this arises only in cases where such conditions are declared. Apparently there is no mechanism in place to diagnose asymptomatic individuals with these tests, but the evidence in the investigation indicated that a risk-based stratification system (for example a Q-Risk score) which takes account of age and comorbidities, rather than just cardiac symptoms, was feasible to reduce the risk of incidents of this type, thereby prompting consideration of stress testing. Alternatively a periodic stress test related to age was suggested as a means of ameliorating risk. Evidence was also provided indicating that on the D4 form there should be a provision to fill in HbA1c and cholesterol results produced within the previous 3 months as obtained by the applicant from a GP. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete cardiovascular risk information for clinical assessment and investigation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of cardiac stress testing for asymptomatic individuals

Wider context from the report

“4) I received evidence that DVLA does commission functional cardiac stress testing for those with known cardiovascular disease, or those with symptoms suspected to be related to cardiac disease but this arises only in cases where such conditions are declared. Apparently there is no mechanism in place to diagnose asymptomatic individuals with these tests, but the evidence in the investigation indicated that a risk-based stratification system (for example a Q-Risk score) which takes account of age and comorbidities, rather than just cardiac symptoms, was feasible to reduce the risk of incidents of this type, thereby prompting consideration of stress testing. Alternatively a periodic stress test related to age was suggested as a means of ameliorating risk. Evidence was also provided indicating that on the D4 form there should be a provision to fill in HbA1c and cholesterol results produced within the previous 3 months as obtained by the applicant from a GP. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to clinically required cardiology tests.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The DVLA can act only on information received from licence holders or healthcare professionals about known medical conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have noted your suggestions regarding the possibility of adding Hbac1 and cholesterol readings as standard to the D4 forms, as a way of screening for risk of heart-related conditions. Currently, the DVLA can only act on information received from licence holders and/or healthcare professionals about known medical conditions.”

Source location

2024-0194 Response from Department for Transport
Page 3 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Continue examining responses to the Call for Evidence on the legislative framework for driver licensing with medical conditions.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 29 April 2024.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    Current driver licensing arrangements are considered balanced and proportionate for road safety and individual mobility.

    Stated by Department for TransportExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  2. 2

    The submitted medical information did not raise health concerns requiring further DVLA investigations into fitness to drive.

    Stated by Department for TransportDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue examining responses to the Call for Evidence on the legislative framework for driver licensing with medical conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The DVLA issued a Call for Evidence late last year to gather views on the legislative framework that governs driver licensing for people with medical conditions. There were 486 responses in total which are currently being examined.”

Source location

2024-0194 Response from Department for Transport
Page 3 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Current driver licensing arrangements are considered balanced and proportionate for road safety and individual mobility.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The current driver licensing arrangements are underpinned by a legal requirement that all drivers, of any age, must inform the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) at any time if they develop a medical condition that may affect safe driving. All drivers must meet the appropriate medical standards for driving and a licence will only be issued to those who meet those standards. These arrangements are designed to be balanced and proportionate for all drivers, balancing road safety and the mobility of individuals.”

Source location

2024-0194 Response from Department for Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The submitted medical information did not raise health concerns requiring further DVLA investigations into fitness to drive.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The information provided to the DVLA on Mr Baxter’s D4 medical reports did not raise any health concerns which would have required the DVLA to conduct further medical investigations into his fitness to drive. Mr Baxter’s D4 medical reports provided information about the medication he was taking, but it was only the medication used to treat diabetes that was relevant in terms of assessing his fitness to drive.”

Source location

2024-0194 Response from Department for Transport
Page 3 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026