PFD report

Darren William Thorpe and 2 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Oct 2014•Northumberland (South)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of a suitable upriver landing area for exiting the river during heavy flow
  2. Lack of a canoe and kayak passage channel at the Riding Mill weir
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls for watercraft encounters with stoppers
  3. Lack of appropriately worded warnings about river exit conditions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a suitable upriver landing area for exiting the river during heavy flow

Wider context from the report

“(2) Evidence was given that on a previous visit to the River Tyne the men had exercised due caution in negotiating the weir by alighting upriver of the weir. It was felt that the most likely interpretation of the known circumstances was that the kayakers had been unable to exit the river because of the flow of water. Would it be feasible to construct a suitable landing area, accompanied by appropriately worded warnings, sufficiently far upriver to enable an exit from the river even at the time of a heavy flow of water? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a canoe and kayak passage channel at the Riding Mill weir

Wider context from the report

“(1) Evidence was given that in other countries within Europe, weirs are constructed with a specific channel to allow the passage of canoes and kayaks without encountering the tow back, or stopper, caused by the anti-scour sill at the foot of the weir. Would it be feasible to amend the design of the Riding Mill weir to incorporate such a channel? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety controls for watercraft encounters with stoppers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of appropriately worded warnings about river exit conditions

Wider context from the report

“(2) Evidence was given that on a previous visit to the River Tyne the men had exercised due caution in negotiating the weir by alighting upriver of the weir. It was felt that the most likely interpretation of the known circumstances was that the kayakers had been unable to exit the river because of the flow of water. Would it be feasible to construct a suitable landing area, accompanied by appropriately worded warnings, sufficiently far upriver to enable an exit from the river even at the time of a heavy flow of water? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.