PFD report

Janet Karen HARRISON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Aug 2024•Hampshire, Southampton and Portsmouth

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Unsafe dimensions of walls in adjoining properties creating a collapse risk during severe storms
    Part of recurring concern: Uncontrolled structural-collapse risks in properties
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Revisit the site after six months to reassess whether any garden walls present immediate risk or require remedial action.

    Stated by Eastleigh Borough CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 October 2024.
  2. Action

    Send residents letters explaining the collapse, potential stability issues and advice to seek experienced builder or engineer guidance.

    Stated by Eastleigh Borough CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 October 2024.
  3. Action

    Survey surrounding garden walls to identify properties with similar potentially unstable designs.

    Stated by Eastleigh Borough CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 October 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Responsibility for garden-wall stability rests with the initial contractor and subsequent property owners, rather than the local authority.

    Stated by Eastleigh Borough CouncilRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unsafe dimensions of walls in adjoining properties creating a collapse risk during severe storms

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence from ████████ the owner of the property adjoining that of Janet Karen HARRISON whose wall collapsed on 18 February 2022, ████████ the occupier and neighbour of Janet Karen HARRISON and the family of Janet Karen HARRISON who were all confirmed to me in evidence that there are a number of adjoining properties in the area which have walls built with the same unsafe dimensions as the one that collapsed on to Janet Karen HARRISON during Storm Eunice. I am therefore concerned that if there were other storms in the UK of similar force to that of Storm Eunice then there is a risk of further walls in the local area collapsing thereby placing others at risk of future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Uncontrolled structural-collapse risks in properties.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revisit the site after six months to reassess whether any garden walls present immediate risk or require remedial action.

Verbatim wording from the response

“10. As no walls currently show immediate risk and therefore do not require immediate remedial action, EBC proposes to revisit the site in 6 months to determine if that remains the case. Should any wall at that point demonstrate potential instability EBC will follow their usual process set out in paragraph 4 of informal engagement with the property owner, and legal action if that does not result in remedial action.”

Source location

Response from Eastleigh Borough Council
Page 2 · response
Published 21 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Send residents letters explaining the collapse, potential stability issues and advice to seek experienced builder or engineer guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“9. ████████ will be undertaking a letter drop to those houses on the estate which have significant length walls of this design, making them aware of the tragic event, outlining the potential stability issues with this type of wall and advising them to seek advice from an experienced builder or engineer to increase the stability of their wall. The letters will be sent within 21 days of today.”

Source location

Response from Eastleigh Borough Council
Page 2 · response
Published 21 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Survey surrounding garden walls to identify properties with similar potentially unstable designs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. In response to this death, ████████, the Principal Building Control Surveyor, conducted a survey of the surrounding garden wall types along Kings Copse Road, using the Land Registry extracts provided to Building Control. The”

Source location

Response from Eastleigh Borough Council
Page 1 · response
Published 21 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for garden-wall stability rests with the initial contractor and subsequent property owners, rather than the local authority.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. This matter relates to a garden wall to a residential property. Building regulations do not apply to the construction of garden walls, therefore it is not uncommon for a variety of wall types to be constructed by developers when building properties. The legal responsibility for the stability of garden walls rests with the initial contractor when building the property, and then the subsequent property owners.”

Source location

Response from Eastleigh Borough Council
Page 1 · response
Published 21 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No walls currently show immediate risk, so immediate remedial action is not considered necessary, subject to a six-month review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“10. As no walls currently show immediate risk and therefore do not require immediate remedial action, EBC proposes to revisit the site in 6 months to determine if that remains the case. Should any wall at that point demonstrate potential instability EBC will follow their usual process set out in paragraph 4 of informal engagement with the property owner, and legal action if that does not result in remedial action.”

Source location

Response from Eastleigh Borough Council
Page 2 · response
Published 21 October 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026