PFD report

Mark LILLIOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Dec 2016•Liverpool and the Wirral

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to ensure immediate access to a radio for emergency calls
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to emergency communication
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure immediate access to a radio for emergency calls

Wider context from the report

“When the two Prison Officers discovered Mr Lilliott they immediately tried to identify an Officer with a radio to request immediate assistance from HOTEL1 (the urgent nursing response within the prison) and subsequently determining that this was a CODE Blue and therefore an emergency ambulance was also required. The two Prison Officers therefore left the cell to seek the Senior Officer with the radio. It was reportedly noisy on the wing at the time. The Prison Officers tried to shout down from level 5 to attract the Senior Officer who they believed was on level 2 but this action was unsuccessful. One of the Prison Officers therefore left the 5’s landing to go down to the lower levels and find the Senior Officer, as he passed through level 4 he saw another Prison Officer who he thought might have a radio but he didn’t and therefore he proceeded to lean over the landing and shout again to try to attract the attention of the Senior Officer with a radio and again it was reported that the Prison Officers shouts were not heard because of the noise, it was a busy period with prisoners making their way to their daily activity. When the Prison Officer shouted again to get the attention of the Senior Officer he was on this occasion heard and the appropriate radio dispatches were immediately made in respect of HOTEL1 and Code Blue. The delay, albeit relatively short, in accessing a Senior Officer in possession of a radio on this occasion did not affect the outcome, Mr Lilliott was already dead when he was discovered and had been for some time. However, it might not have been the case that the prisoner was already deceased and it might have been the case and it might be the case in the future that the fastest possible response and action to radio for emergency help could make a difference to the outcome. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to emergency communication.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.