Christopher Carlton Hart · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Aug 2019•Manchester South

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of tenant conditions requiring furniture conformity with relevant fire safety standards
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety guidance for managing hazards in rented residential properties
  2. Failure to undertake a formal review of sprinkler introduction across properties
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate sprinkler protection in residential accommodation

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Johnnie Johnson Housing

    Monitor emerging findings from the Hackitt Review and update fire-safety approaches as required.

  2. Johnnie Johnson Housing

    Update advisory information on fire safety regulations for general-needs residents.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Johnnie Johnson Housing

    The general-needs home was not considered high risk, so installing sprinklers was not warranted.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  2. Johnnie Johnson Housing

    No further safety action was considered necessary in relation to the home and the concerns raised.

    No action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of tenant conditions requiring furniture conformity with relevant fire safety standards

Wider context from the report

“1) The court heard evidence that toxic fumes from furniture such as sofas which do not conform to relevant fire safety standards can quickly incapacitate someone who breathes them in. It is a matter of concern that Johnnie Johnson Housing imposes no conditions on its tenants as to the conformity of items of furniture with relevant fire safety standards; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety guidance for managing hazards in rented residential properties.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to undertake a formal review of sprinkler introduction across properties

Wider context from the report

“2) The court also heard evidence that, had a sprinkler system been installed within the flat, the chances of Mr Hart surviving the fire would have been significant increased. It is a matter of concern that, notwithstanding Mr Hart’s death, Johnnie Johnson Housing is apparently yet to undertake any formal review as to the introduction of sprinklers into all or a proportion of its properties. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate sprinkler protection in residential accommodation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor emerging findings from the Hackitt Review and update fire-safety approaches as required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We continue to monitor emerging findings following the Hackitt Review and will continue to update our approaches as required.”

Source location

2019-0272-Response-from-Johnnie-Johnson-Housing-1
Page 1 · response
Published 18 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update advisory information on fire safety regulations for general-needs residents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“His second comment on furniture. For our general needs residents we do not provide furniture, although we have updated our advisory information on fire safety regulations.”

Source location

2019-0272-Response-from-Johnnie-Johnson-Housing-1
Page 1 · response
Published 18 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The general-needs home was not considered high risk, so installing sprinklers was not warranted.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I thought it useful to write back, just to re-iterate that there is no further action for us to take here. Mr Jenrick’s comments relate firstly to ‘blocks’. Mr Hart lived in a general needs home, built to standard in 1999. There was no high risk identified here to have installed a sprinkler.”

Source location

2019-0272-Response-from-Johnnie-Johnson-Housing-1
Page 1 · response
Published 18 October 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No further safety action was considered necessary in relation to the home and the concerns raised.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I thought it useful to write back, just to re-iterate that there is no further action for us to take here. Mr Jenrick’s comments relate firstly to ‘blocks’. Mr Hart lived in a general needs home, built to standard in 1999. There was no high risk identified here to have installed a sprinkler.”

Source location

2019-0272-Response-from-Johnnie-Johnson-Housing-1
Page 1 · response
Published 18 October 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026